What?s the point of EHR micro chips with out medical information?

[Mikeybd27]

Over the past 15 years, there has been much discussion about implantable microchips that can store patients? electronic health records (EHRs). Though the FDA approved the first such chip more than 10 years ago, it has yet to be widely adopted. The passing of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) in 2009 helped strengthen regulations surrounding the proper use of EHRs and led to EHR systems being exponentially adopted. But, the same cannot be said about implanted microchips.
While an implanted chip has benefits such as allowing emergency room staff to identify an unresponsive patient and have instant access to his or her medical history, including current medications and allergies, patient http://cliniciantoday.com/ehr-microchips-the-past-present-and-

[h=1]Iris Overview[/h]
For the past decade Iris BioTechnologies has been perfecting the 21st Century tools necessary to bring P4 medicine to the clinic. Iris?s state-of-the-art Nano-biochips? and BioWindows? medical informatics system are capable of capturing and analyzing the many alterations in cancer pathways by capturing mRNA, microRNA, proteins or other biomarkers. Our patented products were developed to overcome the sensitivity, specificity, speed and cost limitations of present state-of-the-art microarray technology. The Iris products are designed to be FDA approved, enabling them to be used in any certified laboratory in the United States.
All life on this planet is based on cells. If you were able to observe yourself developing from the single cell that started you on your journey you would quickly come to realize that you are billions of cells forged into a whole functioning interdependently. Interdependence, whether in a human society or a cellular society, is all about cooperation and control; cooperation and control requires a language.
The language of all cellular societies is based, not on words, but on chemistry. Using molecules where we use words, our cells construct sentences from chains of proteins that inform, command, and instruct each other. Our cells use the information found in our genome to construct those proteins. Genes conserve the language but cells can use it to converse. The breakdown in cellular communication, whether inherited or acquired, results in disease. The practice of P4 medicine - personalization, prediction, prevention, and participation - is based on understanding this communication breakdown.

http://irisbiotech.com/about_iris_biotech/overview.html. Any thoughts?

 

[Hodor]

A "biochip" isn't the same as an implanted chip; a biochip is essentially a highly miniaturized lab running hundreds (or even thousands or tens of thousands) of biochemical tests at once.

When a healthy cell goes cancerous, there are changes in its behavior. It will, for example, increase the production of certain proteins, and the production of others may be surpressed. Thus, a biochip designed to capture proteins can tell you whether these proteins are present at levels that deviate from those in a healthy cell. Another approach would be to detect specific mRNA sequences, which is essentially the biochemical equivalent of listening in on enemy radio communications to pinpoint problems even earlier and more efficiently.

Another advantage is that once the experiment has been run, the results can be automatically detected and interpreted pretty much instantly. You could measure the presence of individual tumor markers, or maybe look for complex patterns that may be characteristic for certain forms of cancer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochip

 

[Mikeybd27]

Interesting article about the creators of the VeriChip!

[h=1]A Chip Off the Old Block: Update on Implanted Microchips[/h][h=2]A Delray Beach company retools technology - and marketing strategy - for human microchips[/h]Amy Keller | 7/1/2010

CEO Scott Silverman displays glass encapsulated chips, which are inserted under the skin, and the scanner, which reads a 16-digit identifying number transmitted by the chips. [Photo: Newscom]

Eight years ago, when Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach introduced a microchip that could be implanted in humans, company executives thought they had a product that would create the ultimate portable medical record. The rice grain-sized VeriChip could save lives by providing access to vital health information in emergency situations when the patient couldn’t speak. One potential use: Keeping track of Alzheimer’s patients who are prone to wandering off but are often unable to communicate effectively because of their illness. The technology was even familiar — almost identical to the chip that millions of Americans have implanted in their pets for identification purposes. Like the pet chip, the VeriChip consists of a glass encapsulated radio frequency identification tag that’s injected under the skin. When exposed to a scanner at close range, it transmits a 16-digit identification number that can be linked to a secure patient database with information on everything from the patient’s drug allergies to pre-existing medical conditions.
The company thought it had a winner. But the chip got under the skin of some who worried that it could be used as a surveillance device. Pets were one thing, but most consumers were uncomfortable with the notion of having a RFID tag under their own epidermis. Scott Silverman, then CEO of VeriChip Corp., the Applied Digital Solutions subsidiary that marketed the chip, disclosed in a 2004 interview with Slate magazine that the company’s own research indicated that nine out of 10 people were uncomfortable with the technology’s use.

PositiveID envisions linking its chip to a database containing information on a patient’s drug allergies and pre-existing health conditions. Another possible use: Keeping track of Alzheimer’s patients. [Photo: Newscom]

VeriChip’s business took a turn for the worse in late 2007, when studies indicated a potential link between RFID transponders and cancer in lab animals. Adding to the company’s woes, several states passed laws prohibiting companies and governments from requiring microchip implants. Despite an aggressive marketing campaign, sales of the company’s VeriMed Health Link System — incorporating the RFID chip, a handheld scanner and an online health record — fell from $76,000 in 2007 to $43,000 in 2008. Another VeriChip subsidiary, Xmark, which sold wearable RFID products, continued to do well, accounting for the vast majority of VeriChip’s revenue.
After selling Xmark in 2008, Silverman decided to take a “few months hiatus” and stepped down as CEO — until his former colleagues at Applied Digital announced in July 2008 that they were planning to liquidate what remained of VeriChip to pay off debt.
At that point, Silverman stepped back in, bought their shares and became majority holder of VeriChip Corp. “I believed fully in the implantable chip technology that remained as an asset,” he says. “The company was still listed on Nasdaq, and a Nasdaq listing has significant value.”
Silverman says his company, which he renamed PositiveID Corp. last year, is no longer actively marketing the implantable chip for identification purposes but is instead working on using the technology for a variety of medical diagnostic purposes.
To that end, PositiveID has partnered with a Minnesota firm called Receptors to develop a microchip that can detect glucose levels in the body and transmit a blood sugar reading to a scanner. The Minnesota company recently received two patents for technologies that will serve as the basis for the device. PositiveID’s glucose sensor is years away from commercialization, Silverman says, but adds that, “In theory, way down the road, that same chip could contain a device to release insulin as well.”
Meanwhile, the company hopes to use similar technology to create a non-implantable test kit that could quickly identify various flu strains. Silverman says the company is already in phase 2 development. It hopes to complete the prototype before the next flu season https://www.floridatrend.com/article/3722/a-chip-off-the-old-block-update-on-implanted-microchips

 

[sekio]

Implanted RFID tags have long been used for e.g. identification of pet cats and dogs. However they do present quite the issue for human patient privacy; there's nothing stopping people from passing you by on the street and retrieving your medical records with a suitable antenna if they can get within range.

Plus, the Christian Right will be up in arms because any sort of permanent identifying marks must be the Mark Of The Beast. Whoops.

 

[fairnymph]

My cats are chipped but I wouldn't get one unless it were a matter of life or death. I'm really freaked out by the idea of implsnted foreign bodies I can't remove easily myself. I imagine this will always be a big issue. Plus, the potential for govt surveillance via chipping of humans is far too likely.

 

[Mikeybd27]

I think must of us are scared of this technology! Movie that comes to mind is THX 1138