• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: tryptakid | Foreigner

Working antisocial hours can prematurely age the brain and dull intellectual ability

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
31,583
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
Shift work dulls your brain - report
By James Gallagher
3 November 2014

Working antisocial hours can prematurely age the brain and dull intellectual ability, scientists warn.

Their study, in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, suggested a decade of shifts aged the brain by more than six years.

There was some recovery after people stopped working antisocial shifts, but it took five years to return to normal.

Experts say the findings could be important in dementia, as many patients have disrupted sleep.

The body's internal clock is designed for us to be active in the day and asleep at night.

The damaging effects on the body of working against the body clock, from breast cancer to obesity, are well known.

Now a team at the University of Swansea and the University of Toulouse has shown an impact on the mind as well.

Three thousand people in France performed tests of memory, speed of thought and wider cognitive ability.

The brain naturally declines as we age, but the researchers said working antisocial shifts accelerated the process.

Those with more than 10 years of shift work under their belts had the same results as someone six and a half years older.

The good news is that when people in the study quit shift work, their brains did recover. Even if it took five years.

'Substantial decline'
Jump media playerMedia player helpOut of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue.
Dr Philip Tucker explains how shift work impairs cognitive performance
Dr Philip Tucker, part of the research team in Swansea, told the BBC: "It was quite a substantial decline in brain function, it is likely that when people trying to undertake complex cognitive tasks then they might make more mistakes and slip-ups, maybe one in 100 makes a mistake with a very large consequence, but it's hard to say how big a difference it would make in day-to-day life."

He said he would not do night shifts "if I could possibly help it" but they were a "necessary evil" that society could not do without.

"There are ways to mitigate the effects in the way you design work schedules and regular medical check-ups... should include cognitive performance tests to look for danger signs," he added.

Continued here http://www.bbc.com/news/health-29879521

...........................................................................................

Interesting stuff. I calls into question off shift positions for non essential jobs.

suggested a decade of shifts aged the brain by more than six years.

There was some recovery after people stopped working antisocial shifts, but it took five years to return to normal.

Seems like pretty substantial changes. I bet there is a link to fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, and autoimmune diseases as well if they were to look.
 
Pretty interesting. I've worked 'anti-social' hours for... A while. Maybe it's time to go back to school.
 
Last edited:
I find working 9-5 far more taxing than working nightshift, but I keep pretty unconventional hours, and always have.
When I work 9-5 full time I feel much more burned out than when I work more flexible hours (ie PM hours).

I get the impression that "anti-social hours" is synonymous with "night time" for a lot of people.
If that is the case for this study, I would have to say it doesn't reflect my experience.

However, if "working against the body clock" means working against your own personal body clock (which I suspect is correct; "body clock" is pretty subjective) - then I'm not surprised at all that it has a negative impact on cognitive function.
 
Umm, how in the heck did they prove this? You can't use different people to measure an effect like this.

Abstract
Objectives Shift work, like chronic jet lag, is known to disrupt workers’ normal circadian rhythms and social life, and to be associated with increased health problems (eg, ulcers, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, breast cancer, reproductive difficulties) and with acute effects on safety and productivity. However, very little is known about the long-term consequences of shift work on cognitive abilities. The aim of this study was to assess the chronicity and reversibility of the effects of shift work on cognition.

Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of 3232 employed and retired workers (participation rate: 76%) who were 32, 42, 52 and 62 years old at the time of the first measurement (t1, 1996), and who were seen again 5 (t2) and 10 (t3) years later. 1484 of them had shift work experience at baseline (current or past) and 1635 had not. The main outcome measures were tests of speed and memory, assessed at all three measurement times.

Results Shift work was associated with impaired cognition. The association was stronger for exposure durations exceeding 10 years (dose effect; cognitive loss equivalent to 6.5 years of age-related decline in the current cohort). The recovery of cognitive functioning after having left shift work took at least 5 years (reversibility).

Conclusions Shift work chronically impairs cognition, with potentially important safety consequences not only for the individuals concerned, but also for society.

The studies linked up in OP and in the linked article as well.
 
I read the same thing, that doesn't prove anything though. Their faster aging could be genetic, environmental, etc... It could possibly not be faster aging at all as well.



Participants and procedure
The data were taken from the VISAT study.12 The initial sample was composed of 3232 present and former wage earners covering a wide range of occupations and economic sectors. The overall distribution by gender and socioeconomic position was very close to that observed at the national level by the French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). Participants were exactly 32, 42, 52 and 62 years old at the time of the first data collection (1996, t1). In the older age cohort, 83% were retirees at t1. Participants were randomly drawn from the patient list of 94 occupational physicians in three southern regions of France and were volunteers (participation rate: 76%). These lists comprised all the salaried workers in the region, as all workers in France have a mandatory annual medical assessment of their aptitude to work. Data were collected through questionnaires and clinical examination by occupational physicians especially trained for the purpose of the study during this annual assessment. Two subsequent data collections took place in 2001 (t2) and 2006 (t3). All those who participated at t1 were invited to participate at t2 and again at t3, irrespective of whether they were still in work. Data for the current study were available for 3119 participants at t1. Of these, 2183 were seen again at t2, and 1253 at t3. A total of 1197 were seen on all three occasions (56 participants who were not seen again at t2 were seen again at t3).

Other variables that were used as covariates were: age (at t1), gender, socioeconomic position (executive, ie, executives and high rank intellectual occupations, technicians and supervisors, vs non-executive, ie, office staff and blue-collar workers), alcohol use (every day vs not every day) and tobacco intake (current or in the past vs never).

They have made some efforts to address some of these potential factors.

There are also previous studies that this one can be added to to seemingly form a growing body of evidence.

Several studies have demonstrated the acute deleterious effects that non-standard working hours have on alertness and cognitive efficiency during night shifts and the following days.1–7 However, only four studies have examined whether there may also be a chronic impact of abnormal work schedules on cognitive abilities (ie, effects that last for several weeks, months or years). Cho et al8 showed cognitive performance deficits and higher cortisol levels in airline cabin crew who had experienced repeated exposure to jet lag for more than 3 years, compared with ground crew working for the same company. There were no such effects in aircrew who had been exposed for 3 years or less. Subsequently, Cho9 found that chronic exposure to short recovery periods (≤5 days) from jet lag was associated with lower cognitive performance, higher salivary cortisol and a smaller volume of the right temporal lobe. These findings were interpreted as showing a cumulative effect of chronic exposure to circadian disruption on cerebral structures and cognitive function.

A subsequent cross-sectional study10 also revealed cognitive deficits in male industrial workers who had been exposed to shift work relative to those who had not, and a decrease in memory performance with increasing exposure to shift work. These effects were independent of age and self-reported sleep quality and are similar to those of Cho and colleagues,8 ,9 in that they appear to reflect chronic exposure to circadian disturbances.

Most recently, a prospective cohort study of nurses found limited evidence of cognitive impairment in later life (≥70 years of age) being associated with a history of exposure to rotating night-shift work, as reported in midlife (ie, at the age of 58–68 years).11 Participants with ≥20 years exposure demonstrated modest impairments in a test of general cognition. However, there were no associations between shift work history and composite measures of general cognition and verbal memory, or between shift work history and cognitive decline.



The conclusion written, is very strong.. should have included some uncertainty?
 
Last edited:
Good article. I wonder if anti social hours refers to evening shifts. I worked nights most my life, even when I switched careers still found a way to pull it off. I would say the type of work one does, and also how one spends their hours not at work.
I wonder if there are studies for folks that do both, alternate shifts and back to backs. Those shifts can keep folks on their toes, but can also cause exhaustion as there is no down time for hours on end… Like say a 12 hour shift, then a full day off, another double shift and so on. Anyways, interesting study.
 
Last edited:
They have made some efforts to address some of these potential factors.

There are also previous studies that this one can be added to to seemingly form a growing body of evidence.


The conclusion written, is very strong.. should have included some uncertainty?

Here's the thing, lack of sleep in itself causes brain damage over a long enough time period. There is nothing saying that those individuals are not actually just experiencing issues from prolonged sleep deprivation. Anything else from what I can tell is likely coincidence.
 
Uhh, no. It would be the result of sleep deprivation.

Lets try logic on this one.

Sleep disruption causes brain damage

Shift work disrupts sleep

Therefore shift work causes brain damage

VALID..

So Uhh, yes.

Why don't you try backing your opinions up. Fielding unsubstantiated musings is annoying and drab.. I know your the end all source, but really I need to see backing or your just a politician in my book.
 
The work I do is stimulating. Just not a morning person (or a 'sleep at night' person).

I know exactly what you mean! Although for me it seems horrible to wake up. I´m slow and moody.
I feel like I´m someone else, if I had to compare to working later at night.
When I do work in alternate times I product a lot more, socialize way better.
I wish I could choose my working hours.

Nsa; by the way, it seems like a nice thing to do when you can back up your ideas and thinking,
but sometimes and we are more relaxed you just say things that you feel, based on your life experience.
If that was the point at all.
 
Lets try logic on this one.

Sleep disruption causes brain damage

Shift work disrupts sleep

Therefore shift work causes brain damage

VALID..

So Uhh, yes.

Because it's not logical. Logic would say that the same exists in everyone, but a person that gets enough sleep wouldn't be effected by sleep deprivation. So in that instance, since it doesn't work for everyone, it's not the actual cause because it's based purely on the circumstances of each individual. Those circumstances being that of what quality of sleep they get.


Why don't you try backing your opinions up. Fielding unsubstantiated musings is annoying and drab.. I know your the end all source, but really I need to see backing or your just a politician in my book.

Well, when your opinion starts mattering to me, I will let you know. Until then, try using the internet properly, there are online dictionaries and free lessons on formal logic all over the internet.

How are you even a mod with that sort of reply? I hope you aren't an Ozzie.
 
Logic would say that the same exists in everyone, but a person that gets enough sleep wouldn't be effected by sleep deprivation. So in that instance, since it doesn't work for everyone, it's not the actual cause because it's based purely on the circumstances of each individual.

Given the complexity and massive number of variables effecting the brain, looking for some constant that determines and predicts effects and variances from one of thousands of variables is ridiculous. This isn't math class.. so not alot of perfect proofs here.

With rotating shifts then a persons normal circadian rhythm would not be a huge factor as it would be disrupted at some point.

Since there are formal lessons on logic then please brush up and attempt a valid argument for this..

Logic would say that the same exists in everyone, but a person that gets enough sleep wouldn't be effected by sleep deprivation. So in that instance, since it doesn't work for everyone, it's not the actual cause because it's based purely on the circumstances of each individual.

If logic says this.. then make it say this.
 
Top