• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

Lawmakers Debunk the Safe Ecstasy Myth

Bootlegger

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 9, 2000
Messages
222
Lawmakers Debunk the Safe Ecstasy Myth
WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) Jul 30 - Federal lawmakers are trying to combat the rapidly rising popularity of Ecstasy, also known as methylenedioxymethamphetamine or MDMA, among teenagers with a message that the drug is psychologically addictive and physically dangerous.
"Despite the evidence to the contrary, kids don't think Ecstasy is a harmful drug," said Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee. The committee held hearings today designed to send a warning signal to teens, whose belief that Ecstasy is relatively harmless has frustrated efforts to control its spread.
The government has been playing catch-up in its attempts to counter Ecstasy's rise, first at rave parties and clubs and now on the streets and in everyday life. Federally sponsored media campaigns about the dangers of the hallucinogenic drug constantly run up against pop culture acceptance of its use and popular opinion that its use can not lead to overdose.
The number of 8th graders claiming to have used Ecstasy within the past month has gone up 55% since 1999, according to White House statistics. Rates of use in 10th and 12th graders have more than doubled during the same time period.
"As the demand for these drugs rises, I'm afraid we will see an increase in deaths," said Sen. James Bunning, a Kentucky Republican.
Dr. Alan Leshner, the government's main scientific voice on the health effects of Ecstasy, said the drug is a stimulant that is often mixed with other stimulants, which can lead to a potentially dangerous combination effect.
Ecstasy causes brain cells to release the neurochemical serotonin, which account for the drug's euphoric effects. After a single dose, "it can take the brain weeks to rebuild serotonin levels to normal," said Dr. Leshner, who directs the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Scientists are concerned that the replenishment system eventually can wear out, leading to chronic mental and emotional problems.
Unlike cocaine and heroin, Ecstasy is not physically addicting and carries a low risk of actual overdose.
"It's more of a mental addiction. After you do it for a while the high is never the same as the first time," said Dayna Moore, a 17-year-old girl who is currently in court-ordered drug rehabilitation in Long Island, New York.
Ecstasy pills sell for $20 to $50. Another 17-year-old rehabilitation patient Philip McCarthy told the committee that he resorted to robbery and burglary to pay for the three to five pills he needed each day to get high.
Congress is considering legislation that would give local jurisdictions $15 million in financial incentives to come up with stricter anti-Ecstasy laws. The bill also calls for the creation of a federal interagency task force to coordinate federal enforcement and prevention efforts.
Assistant Customs Commissioner John C. Verrone blamed misperception about Ecstasy's safety on "social scientists in the so-called harm reduction movement." Verrone said that customs officials were stepping up their efforts to find Ecstasy at international ports of entry, but the agency also fears that domestic production is on the rise.
------------------
And the Mission is the Mouse...
 
There never going to stop people using drugs by making tougher laws. They've used prohibition on drugs since the 50's and that hasn't worked. Is any government ever gonna learn? Even after 50 years of failing?
Also who has 3 to 5 pills a day to get high? What's in the pills heroin? Dumb Americans, or false reporting?
 
more like "Lawmakers make one more pathetic attempt to debunk safe ecstasy myth"
it's not safe, sure, but who's going to believe that when the G is saying it...
frown.gif

------------------
the guy who was once
E-u4ria...
 
In consideration of such an evidence-free and rhetorical article, I'm far more concerned about comments such as:
Assistant Customs Commissioner John C. Verrone blamed misperception about Ecstasy's safety on "social scientists in the so-called harm reduction movement."
... which show a blatant ignorance of real analytical science work done in this field, and omit sensible comparisons of the so-called "safety" of MDMA with respect to various other recreational activities. If truth be told, the "misperceptions about Ecstasy's safety" are more to be blamed upon the font of disinformation that is the media. Where else can such myths be propogated with reckless abandon? God forbid that a harm minimisation supporter should attempt to provide information and education rather than stories of crushed glass, rat poison and CSF drainage.
In my opinion the very least they could do is either obtain a balanced opinion on the subject from someone who is well positioned to back up their words with evidence and fact.
BigTrancer
smile.gif

------------------
Load universe into cannon. Aim at brain. Shoot.
 
Harm minimisation groups have been receiving such blame ever since the concept was invented. Earlier this year the UN announced that it did not want to see western nations pursue HM strategies and wanted Australia to 'steer away' from this form of drug policy / education.
Thankfully their instruction seems to have seen little if any moves in this direction, with most Australian states continuing to support and even expand current harm minimisation efforts.
However, at the time the story surfaced, our T-rusty PM and his rival both thought future policies should reflect this new 'advice'.
Just after that, Howy baby's delivered message was in your mailbox.
phase_dancer
 
isnt it a contradiction?
saying that harm minimisation people are claiming a drug to be safe.. if it was safe, there would be no harm minimisation movement.. logically..
sounds like they dont like real facts being told to the public.. a 0 death toll from ecstacy would be the last thing the government would want, right? (hollands death toll this year, thanks to harm minimisation)..
 
-------------------------
'THE INEFFECTUALITY OF DANCESAFE'
"Ok, let's forget for a moment that their test result patterns are sketchy if
not unbelieveable, the administrators and moderators give out unsafe and
unfactual information, and that hundreds of idiot ravers clearly post their
intent...."
-------------------------
Thought some of you may be interested in this rather scathing attack on our angels of care. [ alt.drugs.ecstasy ]
In defending 5HTP, I was lured into somewhat off track with the reply( please excuse)
To bring the thread back on track, please post your views and add your support to organisations such as dancesafe and bluelight.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&th=f7aae7f18e1dc739,10
 
Top