I guess I am kind of building on what dangermouse and others said, the trust you build over the internet is really a very personal thing and shouldn't be rushed and when you know it's there, you will know.
I mean how can you trust a bunch of characters on your screen? No, of course you can't. If you have had a somewhat lasting friendship on the internet I guess you kind of know what I mean. After reading that article (most of it) I just realised how risky the meets were, not that we were up to anything eh. But if someone, somewhere has something which isn't "suitable" and someone else unwanted knows of this, a lot of shit could go down. Need I elaborate?
What I've read of the article, two things bugged me. The first is that they want to bust drug buyers. They claim later on that it's only for big time stuff.. "..but if Erickson has his way, more cyber-buyers might have to worry about getting arrested." Second of all is using "pedophiles" in the same article, yeah there is such a correlation between mind expanding chemicals and dirty old men who like boys in sailor suits! Give us a break.
Anyway needless to say, let every bluelighter be careful or it could all be a bad trip.
End verbal spew here.
------------------
Feed Your Head.