DukeOfKings
Greenlighter
This is just a question regarding the morality of school drug tests. I assume it's okay to talk about this because Blue light only prohibits asking advice on drug testing and not drug testing discussion in general, correct me if this is inappropriate. I was reading up on the legality of school drug testing and I still can't wrap my head around why schools can randomly test athletes. Drug tests considered searches and the 4th amendment protects us from searches without reasonable suspicion such as by public entities like public schools. Random testing of athletes is in no way reasonable suspicion as it is by definition random. So we should be protected from searches like these. We are not however and I don't understand how a judge could justify a random test as containing reasonable suspicion, or perhaps they just don't give a shit about it. (I was not tested by my school for drugs, I am merely discussing the theoretical legality of it).
EDIT:I know athletics are a privilege and that is sometimes used for justification but it doesn't change the fact that a government entity is conducting a search without reasonable suspicion.
EDIT:I know athletics are a privilege and that is sometimes used for justification but it doesn't change the fact that a government entity is conducting a search without reasonable suspicion.