>> Weed has gotten several times stronger over the past 50 years.
Lets just consider these couple scenarios, either we pay some fair attention to the title and its rigorous interpretation, or spare ourselves the aggravation of falling once again into yet another typical sample of inflationary propaganda which i'd have expected to pop up 2 weeks ago anyway.
1st, the hard way. The concept of « several times » would seem to indicate that using a single word as "twice" was insufficient, so it's not about a 200 % boost. Hence we can guess it actually suggests some integral number starting at 3 times or 300 % and more, fine. But 300+ % more relatively to what, back in the mid-'70s? Male leaves perhaps?...
Then comes my 2nd option. The 1% nostalgia of bigot prohibitionists implies exposure to an elevated amount of contaminants/"$anitary additive$" which of course get conveniently ignored by the haters who'd rather not admit they wish us to engage into self-poisoning on a regular/repeated basis, while it's nothing to compare with eating industrially-produced strawberries.
Just in case nobody noticed, alcohol automatically comes with a glass, e.g. a simple & affordable dosing method that induces auto-conscientisation ideally; in short we know there's something odd going on when a guy shows up drinking directly from a 40 oz bottle of strong "liquor"...
Now it's time i bring back this graphic i keep re-posting practically every year i think:
The approximative yellow perimeter illustrates limitations of genetic encoding for cannabinoïds and their "entourage effect", the plant can't physically dedicate much more than about 30 % to it or we'd have a blob instead of nuggets. In other words there's this undeniable barrier the bigots prefer to forget about, perhaps because if they did account for that then the wheel might stop spinning, which would threaten their purpose, ultimately their own existence... That's why every 4-20 on top of every Halloween the old taglines resurface again and again and again, ad infinitum, ad nauseam!
And how do we know it's really propaganda? I'd say such simplistic slogans tainted with absolutism, leaving no space for nuances in a grey zone: like "weed" is pure evil, etc.
Forget about « H.R. » notions, avoid talking about the pervert effect of dishonest/disrespectful « légaleezation » supposed to protect kids & society while fighting "organized crime" itself financing "terrorism" and more... Alleluïa!!
What's even more odd these days is to observe a perpetuation of THC-centric produ¢t$ on the fre$h-new "legal" market$ besides buzz-denying so-called "balanced" 1:1 THC:CBD and Full-CBD that usually imply declaration of a medical si¢kne$$ requiring a signature in support of unjust laws, though nothing like this exists for alcohol, tobacco and firearms. In any case the graphic above makes it quite evident we're actually witnessing a man-made disaster in terms of Public Health, designed to avoid the 2:1 zone for some reason.
In The Name Of Children!!
See ya next year, or at Halloween.
