Walter Cronkite: Drug war is a war on families (merged)

Invalid Usename

Bluelighter
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Messages
2,923
Walter Cronkite: Drug war is a war on families

Read this first!

As I post this, I would like to point out that I was only able to find two places where it was published. These are the DenverPost.com and the Central Daily Times. Neither of these newspapers would I consider to be an authoritative source.

Consequently, although the writing sounds very much like that of Walter Cronkite, I have been unable to absolutely establish this beyond any doubt. So, although this paper does appear in to news publications, there is a chance that Walter Cronkite is not the original author.

If anyone can post a true, authoritative source, that this was was in fact written by Walter Cronkite, I would greatly appreciate it.




http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~29003~2317472,00.html
also found at:
http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/opinion/9335529.htm


Drug war is a war on families
By Walter Cronkite

Article Published: Sunday, August 08, 2004


In the midst of the soaring rhetoric of the recent Democratic National Convention, more than one speaker quoted Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address, invoking "the better angels of our nature." Well, there is an especially appropriate task awaiting those heavenly creatures - a long-overdue reform of our disastrous war on drugs. We should begin by recognizing its costly and inhumane dimensions.

Much of the nation, in one way or another, is victimized by this failure - including, most notably, the innocents, whose exposure to drugs is greater than ever.

This despite the fact that there are, housed in federal and state prisons and local jails on drug offenses, more than 500,000 persons - half a million people! Clearly, no punishment could be too severe for that portion of them who were kingpins of the drug trade and who ruined so many lives. But by far, the majority of these prisoners are guilty of only minor offenses, such as possessing small amounts of marijuana. That includes people who used it only for medicinal purposes.

The cost to maintain this great horde of prisoners is more than $10 billion annually. And that's just part of the cost of this war on drugs: The federal, state and local drug-control budgets last year added up to almost $40 billion.

These figures were amassed by the Drug Policy Alliance, one of the foremost national organizations seeking to bring reason to the war on drugs and reduce substantially those caught in the terrible web of addiction.

There are awful tales of tragedy and shocking injustice hidden in those figures - the product of an almost mindlessly draconian system called "mandatory sentencing," in which even small offenses can draw years in prison.

Thousands of women, many of them mothers of young children, are included among those minor offenders. Those children left without motherly care are the most innocent victims of the drug war and the reason some call it a "war on families."

Women are the fastest-growing segment of the prison population, with almost 80 percent of them incarcerated for drug offenses. The deep perversity of the system lies in the fact that women with the least culpability often get the harshest sentences.

Unlike the guilty drug dealer, they often have no information to trade for a better deal from prosecutors, and might end up with a harsher sentence than the dealer gets.

Then there are women like Kimba Smith, in California, who probably knew a few things but was so terrified of her abusive boyfriend that she refused to testify against him. (Those who agree to testify, by the way, frequently are murdered before they have a chance to do so.) Smith paid for her terrified silence with a 24-year sentence. Nonviolent first offenders, male and female, caught with only small amounts of a controlled substance frequently are given prison sentences of five to 10 years or more. As a result, the number of nonviolent offenders in the nation's prisons is filling them to overflowing, literally. The resulting overcrowding is forcing violent felons onto the streets with early releases.

The Drug Policy Alliance also points out other important areas of injustice in the present enforcement system. For instance, people of color - African-Americans and Latinos - are far more likely to be jailed for drug offenses than others. And college students caught in possession of very small amounts of illegal substances are denied student loans and even food stamps.

The Alliance and other organizations are working to reform and reframe the war on drugs. And they are finding many judges on their side, who are rebelling against this cruel system. We can expect no federal action during the congressional hiatus in activity ahead of the November elections, but it would be of considerable help if, across the country, campaigning politicians put this high on their promises of legislative action, much sooner than later.


Walter Cronkite has been a journalist for more than 60 years, including 19 as anchor of the CBS Evening News.



==================================
[Included in the CentreDaily.com publication]

http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/opinion/9335529.htm

Walter Cronkite's column is distributed by King Features Syndicate. E-mail him at [email protected].
 
Drug war is a war on families - By Walter Cronkite

(feel free to edit this and move to the front page if deemed appropriate)
http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~29003~2317472,00.html

Drug war is a war on families
By Walter Cronkite (in the Denver Post)
August 8, 2004

In the midst of the soaring rhetoric of the recent Democratic National Convention, more than one speaker quoted Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address, invoking "the better angels of our nature." Well, there is an especially appropriate task awaiting those heavenly creatures - a long-overdue reform of our disastrous war on drugs. We should begin by recognizing its costly and inhumane dimensions.

Much of the nation, in one way or another, is victimized by this failure - including, most notably, the innocents, whose exposure to drugs is greater than ever.

This despite the fact that there are, housed in federal and state prisons and local jails on drug offenses, more than 500,000 persons - half a million people! Clearly, no punishment could be too severe for that portion of them who were kingpins of the drug trade and who ruined so many lives. But by far, the majority of these prisoners are guilty of only minor offenses, such as possessing small amounts of marijuana. That includes people who used it only for medicinal purposes.

The cost to maintain this great horde of prisoners is more than $10 billion annually. And that's just part of the cost of this war on drugs: The federal, state and local drug-control budgets last year added up to almost $40 billion.

These figures were amassed by the Drug Policy Alliance, one of the foremost national organizations seeking to bring reason to the war on drugs and reduce substantially those caught in the terrible web of addiction.

There are awful tales of tragedy and shocking injustice hidden in those figures - the product of an almost mindlessly draconian system called "mandatory sentencing," in which even small offenses can draw years in prison.

Thousands of women, many of them mothers of young children, are included among those minor offenders. Those children left without motherly care are the most innocent victims of the drug war and the reason some call it a "war on families."

Women are the fastest-growing segment of the prison population, with almost 80 percent of them incarcerated for drug offenses. The deep perversity of the system lies in the fact that women with the least culpability often get the harshest sentences.

Unlike the guilty drug dealer, they often have no information to trade for a better deal from prosecutors, and might end up with a harsher sentence than the dealer gets.

Then there are women like Kimba Smith, in California, who probably knew a few things but was so terrified of her abusive boyfriend that she refused to testify against him. (Those who agree to testify, by the way, frequently are murdered before they have a chance to do so.) Smith paid for her terrified silence with a 24-year sentence. Nonviolent first offenders, male and female, caught with only small amounts of a controlled substance frequently are given prison sentences of five to 10 years or more. As a result, the number of nonviolent offenders in the nation's prisons is filling them to overflowing, literally. The resulting overcrowding is forcing violent felons onto the streets with early releases.

The Drug Policy Alliance also points out other important areas of injustice in the present enforcement system. For instance, people of color - African-Americans and Latinos - are far more likely to be jailed for drug offenses than others. And college students caught in possession of very small amounts of illegal substances are denied student loans and even food stamps.

The Alliance and other organizations are working to reform and reframe the war on drugs. And they are finding many judges on their side, who are rebelling against this cruel system. We can expect no federal action during the congressional hiatus in activity ahead of the November elections, but it would be of considerable help if, across the country, campaigning politicians put this high on their promises of legislative action, much sooner than later.

Walter Cronkite has been a journalist for more than 60 years, including 19 as anchor of the CBS Evening News.

[edit: fixed format and added text link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Then there are women like Kimba Smith, in California, who probably knew a few things but was so terrified of her abusive boyfriend that she refused to testify against him. (Those who agree to testify, by the way, frequently are murdered before they have a chance to do so.) Smith paid for her terrified silence with a 24-year sentence.

Note that this is more time than that bitch who, last year, ran down her husband with her SUV got. I don't care what Ms. Smith did, unless she killed someone, she should not have gotten more time than a murdurer...

[edit: formatted for clarity]
 
Last edited:
"Thousands of women, many of them mothers of young children, are included among those minor offenders. Those children left without motherly care are the most innocent victims of the drug war and the reason some call it a "war on families."

Women are the fastest-growing segment of the prison population, with almost 80 percent of them incarcerated for drug offenses. The deep perversity of the system lies in the fact that women with the least culpability often get the harshest sentences."

Okay, you ever see a judge consider fatherly time at home or children growing up without their dads? No? I haven't either. I'm all for ending the war on drugs, but this women shouldn't do time for the same thing stuff is garbage. If they are going to enforce laws, even bad laws, they should be enforced evenly.

Women are already 16 X more likely to get probation than a man charged with the same crime, get less than 1/3 of the sentence when they do get sentenced, and are less likely to get charged in the first place even for serious *real* crimes.
 
um, sacred, i think you just missed the entire point of the article. Cronkite was just using this woman as an example of one of the horrible effects of the drug war. He's not trying to make a statement about the functioning of the judicial system, but mentioning one anecdote to emphasize his point. He's not saying that women are being treated worse than men by the judicial system, although he does imply that they may get a raw deal when being charged with minor drug offenses. He is just trying to emphasize that the drug war is a big crock of shit. And the reason women get "better" sentences for many crimes is because women are far less likely to repeat an offense, and they comply with probation poliicies better. And I would really like to know what you mean about women not getting charged for "serious, real crimes." What the fuck is a "serious, real crime" and why would women not get punished for one??? You sound pretty misogynist by saying that kind of thing.
 
here's an interesting 'letter to the editor' i found

Drug war in large part a war on marijuana
Published in the Times Union (Albany, NY)
Sunday, August 15, 2004

Walter Cronkite's Aug. 9 column was right on target. The drug war is in large part a war on marijuana, by far the most popular illicit drug and arguably New York's No. 1 cash crop.
Marijuana prohibition has done little other than burden millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens with criminal records. The University of Michigan's "Monitoring the Future" study reports that lifetime use of marijuana is higher in the United States than in any European country, yet America is one of the few Western countries that uses its criminal justice system to punish citizens who prefer marijuana to martinis.

Unfortunately, marijuana represents the counterculture to many Americans. In subsidizing the prejudices of culture warriors, the U.S. government is subsidizing organized crime. The drug war's distortion of immutable laws of supply and demand make an easily grown weed literally worth its weight in gold.

The only clear winners in the war on marijuana are drug cartels and shameless tough-on-drugs politicians who've built careers on confusing drug prohibition's collateral damage with a relatively harmless plant.


ROBERT SHARPE
Policy Analyst
Common Sense for Drug Policy
Washington

Link
 
Top