• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Vaccines Don't Cause Autism! But Antidepressants during pregnancy do?

maxmaxCity

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
50
Link: http://goo.gl/2qBeFI

Huge Study. 145,456 Children enrolled in this study! Interesting development for the autism community. I've read that Autism affects 1 in 68 children born in the USA now.


What do you all think?

Quote from the study,
"Using antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), during the 2nd/3rd trimesters of pregnancy increases the risk of having a child with autism (87 percent increased risk of autism with any antidepressants; more than doubling the risk with SSRI use specifically)"
 
Original study: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2476187

ABSTRACT
Importance The association between the use of antidepressants during gestation and the risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children is still controversial. The etiology of ASD remains unclear, although studies have implicated genetic predispositions, environmental risk factors, and maternal depression.

Objective To examine the risk of ASD in children associated with antidepressant use during pregnancy according to trimester of exposure and taking into account maternal depression.

Design, Setting, and Participants We conducted a register-based study of an ongoing population-based cohort, the Québec Pregnancy/Children Cohort, which includes data on all pregnancies and children in Québec from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2009. A total of 145 456 singleton full-term infants born alive and whose mothers were covered by the Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec drug plan for at least 12 months before and during pregnancy were included. Data analysis was conducted from October 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015.

Exposures Antidepressant exposure during pregnancy was defined according to trimester and specific antidepressant classes.

Main Outcomes and Measures Children with ASD were defined as those with at least 1 diagnosis of ASD between date of birth and last date of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CIs.

Results During 904 035.50 person-years of follow-up, 1054 children (0.7%) were diagnosed with ASD; boys with ASD outnumbered girls by a ratio of about 4:1. The mean (SD) age of children at the end of follow-up was 6.24 (3.19) years. Adjusting for potential confounders, use of antidepressants during the second and/or third trimester was associated with the risk of ASD (31 exposed infants; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.15-3.04). Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during the second and/or third trimester was significantly associated with an increased risk of ASD (22 exposed infants; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.20-3.93). The risk was persistent even after taking into account maternal history of depression (29 exposed infants; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.03-2.97).

Conclusions and Relevance Use of antidepressants, specifically selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, during the second and/or third trimester increases the risk of ASD in children, even after considering maternal depression. Further research is needed to specifically assess the risk of ASD associated with antidepressant types and dosages during pregnancy.
 
These findings have been reported in a really dangerous way. The methodology of the study was reasonably solid, although I don't think they effectively controlled for differences in the ongoing and current relationship women on SSRIs had with psychiatric staff, compared to women who are not currently on psych meds.

Even accepting the findings as sound, though, the observed difference in autism prevalence was 0.7% vs 1.8%. That's absolutely not compelling enough to discourage pregnant women from taking their prescribed psychiatric medication, especially if you contrast it with rates of suicide, self-harm and substance abuse for women with untreated depression.

This is reminiscent of the highly discredited autism/vaccines link. Even if the science linking SSRIs and autism is more sound than the claims about vaccines, women should not be encouraged to think that a small risk of having an autistic child is a good argument for avoiding necessary, life saving health care.
 
Even if the science linking SSRIs and autism is more sound than the claims about vaccines, women should not be encouraged to think that a small risk of having an autistic child is a good argument for avoiding necessary, life saving health care.

Oh please...8)

I think most women could survive 9 months off an SSRI that they aren't supposed to be on long term anyway. SSRIs are hardly 'necessary'. What did people do before prozac anyway?
 
Top