Tobacco companies studied ways to hook female smokers

E-llusion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Messages
5,975
Location
ALASKA
Tobacco companies did elaborate research on women to figure out how to hook them on smoking - even toying with the idea of chocolate-flavored cigarettes that would curb appetite, according to a new analysis.

Researchers at Harvard University's School of Public Health said they examined more than 7 million documents - some dating back to 1969, others as recent as 2000 - for new details about the industry's efforts to lure more women smokers.

Carrie Carpenter, the study's lead author, said companies' research went far beyond a marketing or advertising campaign. advertisement

"They did so much research in such a sophisticated way," she said. "Women should know how far the tobacco industry went to exploit them."

The report, published in the June issue of the journal Addiction, says tobacco companies looked for ways to modify their cigarettes to give women the illusion they could puff their way into a better life.

One of the documents, a 1993 internal report from Phillip Morris, extolled the virtues of making a longer, slimmer cigarette that offered the false promise of a "healthier" product.

"Most smokers have little notion of their brand's tar and nicotine levels," the report states. "Perception is more important than reality, and in this case the perception is of reduced tobacco consumption."

A Phillip Morris spokesman declined to comment on the report, saying the company hasn't had a chance to fully review it.

The Harvard researchers spent more than a year sifting through an online database of internal documents made public following the 1998 settlement between tobacco companies and 46 states.

Carpenter said they found at least 320 documents that focused on women's smoking patterns, including a 1982 report from British-American Tobacco Co. that said women buy cigarettes to help them "cope with neuroticism."

"We can safely conclude that the strength of cigarettes that are purchased by women is related to their degree of neuroticism," the report stated.

Other internal studies showed that companies explored adding appetite suppressants to cigarettes.

In 1980, for instance, R.J. Reynolds Co. proposed creating a cigarette with a "unique flavor that decreases a smoker's appetite, including brandy, chocolate, chocolate mint, cinnamon, spearmint and honey."

However, researchers didn't find any evidence they followed through with that idea.

The report says worldwide smoking rates among women are expected to increase 20 percent by 2025, "driven by the growth of female markets in developing countries," while men's smoking rates are steadily declining.

Jack Henningfield, a professor of behavioral biology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said he hopes the report serves as a "call to action" for government officials to focus their anti-smoking efforts on women, particularly in developing countries.

"It's a time bomb," said Henningfield, director of the Innovators Combating Substance Abuse Program at Johns Hopkins. "They've got to act now to prevent the time bomb from exploding."

Carpenter said there is no evidence in the trove of documents that suggests tobacco companies have stopped targeting women.

"Without regulation from government agencies, we don't know what they're doing today," she added.

The Harvard research project was funded in part by the National Cancer Institute.

---
Tobacco companies studied ways to hook female smokers, study says

Associated Press
May. 31, 2005 12:14 PM
Link
 
Crazeee said:
Tobacco companies did elaborate research on women to figure out how to hook them on smoking - even toying with the idea of chocolate-flavored cigarettes that would curb appetite, according to a new analysis.
Damn, way to exploit the stereotypical, socially-enforced desires of what seems like, increasinly, most women. This fucking pisses me off. :X
 
Last edited:
What is wrong with this? If the stereotypes are true, then it is just giving the people what they want. If they are false, well then that won't work anyway so who cares? You think your dealer doesn't know what he's selling might cause problems for you? I wish my dealers tried to cater to my tastes like that.
 
I also don't see why this is such a big deal. Every consumer-oriented industry in the world hires people that do nothing but try and think of novel ways to entice consumers into purchasing their goods or services. Why should tobacco be any different?
 
Re: Re: Tobacco companies studied ways to hook female smokers

fruitfly said:
Damn, way to exploit the stereotypical, socially-enforced desires of most American women. This fucking pisses me off. :X

i dont get all mad when commerce tries to appeal to stereotypical male traits

they are a company.. they are going to market their product like any other company. as siad in the past couple posts, it's not a big deal
 
Flavoured cigatettes are already here, apple in this case.
Anger over fruity cigarettes
Jacqueline Freegard
28apr05

FRUIT-flavoured cigarettes aimed at young women have outraged anti-smoking groups.

The DJ Mix Special Feel cigarettes come in iced green apple, strawberry and lemon fresh flavours.

The packets illuminate under disco lights and anti-smoking groups say the cigarettes are comparable to alcoholic icy poles.

QUIT executive director Todd Harper said there was no doubt the cigarettes were aimed at the youth market.

"It's pretty low and in poor taste to be finding new ways to get young people interested and engaged in smoking," Mr Harper said.

"Depicting fruit is designed to make the product feel safe, innocuous and tasty."

The DJ Tobacco website states the company strongly believes "that tobacco products should never be marketed towards youth".

But Mr Harper said the packaging was specifically designed with young women in mind.

"It's very disturbing," Mr Harper said. "It's a poor taste effort aimed at recruiting young kids."

Victorian Alcohol and Drug Association spokesman Evan Sycamnias said the cigarettes were marketed towards the young generation of clubbers.

"The phrasing of the name, the advertising technique and the visuals all promote the product to a young audience," Mr Sycamnias said.

"Even the phrase DJ mix is a term young kids would understand quite well."

Trojan Tobacco, the company that markets the DJ brand in Australia, declined to comment yesterday.
 
Yes, that's the nature of business, but that doesn't mean I simply shrug my shoulders and accept it. I do get angry, and though I can't do much to change this aspect of consumer culture I can at least try to notice it and point it out. That's my method of resistance.
 
maybe it would be better to get angry at all the stereotypical women. they offer the incentive for hte company after all
 
Hmm ... well, "stereotypical women" aren't born in a vacuum. They are produced by a particular commodified culture that they in turn perpetuate.

From the article:
"We can safely conclude that the strength of cigarettes that are purchased by women is related to their degree of neuroticism," the report stated.
Sure, it's legal. It's "normal." But the idea of tobacco companies deliberately researching ways to exploit people's fears and weaknesses gives me the creepy crawlies.
 
this reminds me of the original act that got women smoking. A hundred years ago, tobacco was only acceptable for men to consume in public; it wasn't "lady-like". The tobbacco companies wanted to figure out how to increase their market share, and the inventor of public relations hit upon an idea

Torches of Freedom

On March 31, 1929, a woman by the name of Bertha Hunt stepped into the throng of pedestrians in their Sunday-best clothing marching down Fifth Avenue in what was known in New York as the Easter Parade, and created a sensation by lighting up a Lucky Strike cigarette. Her action would not have created the reaction it did had not the press already been alerted to what was going to happen in advance. Hunt then told the reporter from the New York Evening World that she “first got the idea for this campaign when a man with her in the street asked her to extinguish her cigarette as it embarrassed him. ‘I talked it over with my friends, and we decided it was high time something was done about the situation.’”

Mrs. Taylor-Scott Hardin parades down New York's Fifth Avenue with her husband while smoking "torches of freedom" The press, of course, had been warned in advance that Bertha and her friends were going to light up. They had received a press release informing them that she and her friends would be lighting “torches of freedom” “in the interests of equality of the sexes and to fight another sex taboo.” Bertha also mentioned that she and her friends would be marching past “the Baptist church where John D. Rockefeller attends” on the off chance that he might want to applaud their efforts. At the end of the day, Bertha and her friends told the press that she hoped they had “started something and that these torches of freedom, with no particular brand favored, will smash the discriminatory taboo on cigarettes for women and that our sex will go on breaking down all discriminations.’”

What Miss Hunt did not tell the reporter is that she was the secretary of a man by the name of Eddie Bernays, nor did she tell him that Mr. Bernays was now a self-styled expert in the new discipline of Public Relations who had just received a handsome retainer from the American Tobacco Company to promote cigarette consumption among women. What billed itself as a feminist promotion of the emancipation of women was in reality a public relations ploy to open a new market for tobacco by getting women addicted to cigarettes.

http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/1999/torches.html



the whole idea of marketing in general is pretty creepy.. play on people's wants and desires to get them to buy things they don't need. it's unfortunate that so many people allow themselves to be played
 
They tried to find a way to get any class, race, sex, age, gender, or nationality addicted. Thats how THEY survive. WE survive by not doing it, then again I bet some smokers will claim the live by doing it. :D
 
What if they were a marijuana corporation and we all marched down the street lighting our own torches of freedom? Then we could sell a bunch of crap to potheads they don't need from magazines like high times and cannabis culture. Oh wait they already did that. I guess it doesn't work until the Republicans get their pockets lined with drug money.
 
tokey said:
What if they were a marijuana corporation and we all marched down the street lighting our own torches of freedom? Then we could sell a bunch of crap to potheads they don't need from magazines like high times and cannabis culture. Oh wait they already did that. I guess it doesn't work until the Republicans get their pockets lined with drug money.


Hehehe ^^....this is exactly what I was thinking!!!!!! I don't smoke pot, but it really really pisses me off that it has been so demonized when IMO it's a very harmless substance.. I would most definitely participate in marching with a large group of stoners (in the USA) puffing our

"Tourches of Freedom"

Could you IMAGINE the contraversy this would cause? It sounds like fun!!!LOL

Let's do it!!!!!!!=D
 
Crazeee said:
Tobacco companies did elaborate research on women to figure out how to hook them on smoking - even toying with the idea of chocolate-flavored cigarettes that would curb appetite, according to a new analysis.
Jesus, that is so sexist. Some of us men would like those too!

Got to get rid of this beer belly somehow...
 
So, i guess if your the tobacco industry, if you make a product that tries to apeal to women, we must assume you are trying to get them hooked on it?

You know these anti-tabacco people are begging to act as low and immoral as the tabocco industry themelves with thier spin and tactics.
 
rowland2110 said:
So, i guess if your the tobacco industry, if you make a product that tries to apeal to women, we must assume you are trying to get them hooked on it?

considering it's now known tobacco companies knew their product was highly addictive, anything they did to encourage smoking could be seen as an attempt to get people hooked on cigarettes.

Also, if you read the article, the company encouraged perception over reality. It didn't matter if they produced a safer cigarette, it only mattered that they gave off the perception of a safer cigarette.


i think things like this show the dangers of marketing and public relations. people can easily be convinced of something that isn't true, and marketing is the science of how to do it most effectively hehe
 
Last edited:
Top