• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet

The mesolimbic dopamine system & drugs of abuse

C6H6

Bluelighter
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
607
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005 Aug 10; [Epub ahead of print]

The mesolimbic dopamine system: The final common pathway for the reinforcing effect of drugs of abuse?

Pierce RC, Kumaresan V.

Departments of Pharmacology and Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany Street, L603 Boston, MA 02118, USA.

In this review we will critically assess the hypothesis that the reinforcing effect of virtually all drugs of abuse is primarily dependent on activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. The focus is on five classes of abused drugs: psychostimulants, opiates, ethanol, cannabinoids and nicotine. For each of these drug classes, the pharmacological and physiological mechanisms underlying the direct or indirect influence on mesolimbic dopamine transmission will be reviewed. Next, we evaluate behavioral pharmacological experiments that specifically assess the influence of activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system on drug reinforcement, with particular emphasis on animal experiments using drug self-administration paradigms. There is overwhelming evidence that all five classes of abused drugs increase dopamine transmission in limbic regions of the brain through interactions with a variety of transporters, ionotropic receptors and metabotropic receptors. Behavioral pharmacological experiments indicate that increased dopamine transmission is clearly both necessary and sufficient to promote psychostimulant reinforcement. For the other four classes of abused substances, self-administration experiments suggest that although increasing mesolimbic dopamine transmission plays an important role in the reinforcing effects of opiates, ethanol, cannabinoids and nicotine, there are also dopamine-independent processes that contribute significantly to the reinforcing effects of these compounds.

PMID: 16099045
 
LOL, I guess Pierce RC and Kumaresan V had nothing to do and were pressured to submit a study so they decided to bring out the old stuff. DA/addiction is soooo 90's.

I don't understand what they contributed with this paper?
 
Yup.. theres like a billion reviews on most topical subjects "Cannabis as a medicine?" x 1000
 
Last edited:
You folks are right, didn't realize that when I posted it. Every couple days I'm doing a Pubmed search on a list of key terms. This one seemed interesting, so I posted it here, but on a second look it's old news really.
 
Top