But that framework rarely, if ever, currently exists. So what are your beliefs about introducing people to drugs now, as things are?
Yeah, that's true, although the building blocks for drug policy to be transformed are there and it's only a matter of time before the demand to change drug policy becomes a priority. Lots has changed over the recent years to the point where the landscape in regards to drugs and the perception of them is almost alien compared to not even 10-15 years ago when weed was pure evil for example.
Responsibility is vital as well as boundaries and open dialogue is important too. You also have to ask what sort of relationship is it? Do you know this person? How well? Is the person a loved one, good friend, acquaintance, stranger? Ultimately you are not responsible for anybody but yourself but then again the relationship also infers the connection and also importance of this individual, duty of care etc. Presuming we are talking about adults here you can only do so much but that what you do should be sufficient enough to provide as much support as possible. The last decision will be that of the individual. Introducing somebody to a drug should be consensual and based on understanding what it means to do that and where the boundaries are in terms of where you end and they begin. From my experience it can become too easy to become entangled in a relationship with someone regarding drugs based on negative dynamics within a relationship. This would have to be eradicated so both individuals could be present enough in the relationship to understand their roles and be available to how they feel, what their intentions are, what their expectations are, whether they are mentally, emotionally and physically capable of guiding someone to a point where they make their own decision. And from the point of the person taking the drug for the first time likewise they must be in a position that reflects preperation, intention and full awareness and responsibility of their actions. If you're in a bad place in life amplified by addiction but see no repercussions introducing someone to a drug that has you hooked you're blurring the boundaries and now you're essentially projecting your predicament onto this other individual, perhaps as an attempt to release your own burden and experience someone else share it with you. Likewise and for the person taking a drug for the first time, the same thing. You're essentially pushing someone onto the railway tracks with you at this point.
It must be a healthy dynamic and both parties aware of their responsibilities and goals. And if it's not right or it feels unethical then perhaps it is. Are we referring to stigma? Are we talking about legal implications? Potential for harm and/or damage to an individual or perhaps even society? Are we referring to some nuanced context that perhaps refers to an individuals personal life, their goals, ambitions, current state of mind, state of relationships etc? Do we know this person well enough to account for as much as possible in at least being able to make our own decision as to whether we wish to proceed in turning them on to something? In which case, understanding your involvement and drawing a line in the sand is important. And understanding where they are at and where they want to go and what they want out of it is key. No point trying to make someone be more available when their intentions are to escape. And when it's you trying to escape and them trying to be more available? Same process of understanding is required.
Unfortunately the environment by which many people gain entry to drug use is often not the most ideal and this is where the minefield of working out where you are at begins and often where people get lost or simply wander off. We owe this to the failed war on drugs and the shambolic state of affairs in regards to how we see drug use in society. The public marketplace for this kind of discussion is not as open as we all wish, hence why we are all here on a forum where we at least enjoy some sort of psuedo-anonymity. I say psuedo-anonymity because the way in which most people operate on the internet (in terms of describing opsec/operational security and privacy) greatly reduces what tangible protection they have from being identified. I can bet most people use the same email address or provide sufficient breadcrumbs that lead back to their person in some way. Reminds me of the SWIM days where the perceived need to disguise yourself was ever more present than today. My point is that we are here for a reason and it's because public discourse about this kind of stuff is woefully lacking. That doesn't make this any easier at all, in fact it makes it worse. Have you considered this? Does it affect your decisions? Where you are involved, is there anything projected onto this new individual? Are you lost? Are you struggling? How do YOU see drug use? Is it positive? Negative? How has drugs affected YOU? What would you truly say if you were able to speak your mind about drugs? Would it likely change this persons mind about taking them? Are you potentially going to negatively impact this individual in some way? You're not aiming to make things hard(er) for someone, it should be easier, safe and as many boxes checked as possible and therefore this should be reflected in the responsibility you have for talking drugs with others and involving others in drug use.
That would be my preferred block of advice to provide, at least in the context on providing advise for those who are also providing advise and potentially introducing somebody to a drug they may (or may not) choose to consume.
How about you? What do you think?