I like your username.
Clonazepam can't be forced into acting any better than it does taken by itself, I've never had anything potentiate any of the benzodiazepines I've taken and I've taken probably 95% of the benzodiazepines used in modern medicine, may I ask, just what does the cimetidine do? Like for you individually, I know what some other people have reported from attempting to potentiate a benzodiazepine although the consensus by a landslide report that nothing they've tried does anything whatsoever, and that the only way to get more out of a benzodiazepine is to take a slightly higher dose of the benzodiazepine you're trying to potentiate. In conclusion, the only way that I, and most of the people I've discussed this subject with, overall seem to feel that it may be best not to mess around with enzyme inhibitors if there's no point in doing so.
I mean maybe something may extend a half life by a negligible to minor-moderate amounts, so maybe it stays in your system a tiny bit longer, but do you actually feel a significant difference from taking benzodiazepines (especially other than clonazepam, have you taken other benzodiazepines? Clonazepam is a poor example because of it's notoriously annoying onset which takes hours, whereas most benzodiazepines are meant to kick in quickly, plus it's wildcard of a half life, so I'm just asking in general with benzodiazepines...) with potentiating them.
How is it effective or desirable over just taking the clonazepam by itself?
Is cimetidine the only chemical you've used? Clonazepam takes so freaking long to kick in already, no matter what ROA be it IV, sublingual, or oral administration, it still takes the same amount of time for onset to kick in and for it to peak in hours, so what if potentiating with clonazepam actually made it take even longer for your body to feel the clonazepam kick in?
Just curious.