• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet

Study: Fear & Anxiety in Animal Models (mice)

soundphaRm

Bluelighter
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
2,416
Location
From: Trinidad, Humboldt Co., CA
Here's a study that was done that I have access to the info (from the New England Journal of Medicine) on, that I thought the ADD community would be interested in...

"The Molecular Mechanisms of Fear: An Animal Model

Although the neural circuitry of fear and anxiety (i.e., the role of the amygdala and related subcortical structures) is now better understood, we know little about the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in these circuits. This series of studies examined the role of stathmin, an inhibitor of microtubule formation, in both conditioned and unconditioned fear models in mice. The stathmin gene and protein are highly expressed in the amygdala and in anatomic areas known to process conditioned and unconditioned stimuli before they reach the amygdala.

Mice that had stathmin knocked out had more microtubules in the amygdala than did wild-type mice, but no abnormalities in amygdala-related neurons, neuronal synaptic strength, or glutamate- or GABA-facilitated neurotransmission. However, stathmin-knockout mice had a deficit in long-term potentiation and decreases in both conditioned fear and innate (unconditioned) fear.

Comment: These studies show that stathmin is required for the expression of innate fear and the formation of memory for learned fear. It is most intriguing that intracellular events in addition to communication between cells are crucial to, and underlie abnormalities in, behavior and emotion. Thus, some cellular events crucial to fear formation may depend on proper functioning of microtubules (i.e., transport of protein and RNA to synapses helps to increase synaptic strength, which is required to create memories underlying conditioned fear). The increased number of microtubules could indicate greater stability and a decrease in plasticity needed for synaptic regulation and change in response to new stimuli. Studies such as these open a new window on what might be going awry in the brains of individuals with pathologic anxiety states."
 
Another LTP/behavior correlation. These things are a dime a dozen nowadays. It remains to be seen whether the results can be replicated, and whether they fit into a logical biochemical/cell biological explanation.
 
True...although, I wouldn't necessarily call (what at first glance seem to be) them "a dime/dozen", because it's research like this, that builds up, a little bit at a time, over time that leads to significant/revolutionary findings.

Even Tesla and Einstein studied previous (seemingly inconclusive) works to come up with revolutionary ideas...:\
 
Well it makes perfect sense. Animals that have fucked intracellular trafficking can't learn, and hence they can't learn to be afraid of things.

Ontop of that, any drug which is amnesic is anxiolytic, even after the behaviour has been learned, so it's doubley unsurprising.
 
Top