• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Spirituality, the VMAT2 gene, and the future neuropsychology of belief

P A

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
1,268
Location
Annapolis, Maryland
Though I would never be so facile as to identify any single gene with an overarching human trait (let alone such a behaviorally complex trait as spirituality) I do find the apparent association between the expression of the VMAT2 gene (see :? ) and the incidence of religiosity to be of some interest. While it may not point to anything remotely close to a 'God gene,' the literature does stimulate what has, until recently, been a purely speculative area of research - neurospirituality. The formal study of this topic is relatively new, which is somewhat surprising, considering humanity's longstanding attraction to psychedelics, entheogens, and the like. The only current literature of which I'm aware is the aforementioned VMAT2 studies and (depending upon your definition of spirituality) the psilocybin trials in JAMA. I'd love to know if anyone has come across anything new or exciting in this subfield, and would enjoy hearing your thoughts upon the topic either way.

What do you think will ultimately become of religion/spirituality when it, like so many other forms of human behavior, is extensively biologized, pathologized, and subjected to experimental scrutiny to the point where each of its mechanisms could be explained in sufficient enough detail that the prospect of 'modifications' and 'cures' would no longer be as close to science fiction as many would prefer? I am aware that this ties heavily into the ongoing debate over a putative neuroethics of the not-so-distant future, but I see neurospirituality as offering a nuance not contained by the former topic, namely the unmatched importance of spiritual ideology to human life, history, and culture.

Here is a link to a deeply disturbing video that was supposedly taken during a DOD conference of sorts, during which just such a 'cure' was (poorly, unethically, and haphazardly) proposed. I'm not sure how legit this footage may be, but it serves to effectively underscore the topic regardless.

:? [a.k.a. SLC18A2, this gene encodes the vesicular monoamine transporter subtype 2, a kind of protein vacuum responsible for sucking up monoamines like serotonin and noradrenaline into synaptic vesicles in the CNS.]

Also, mod(s), feel free to move this wherever you see fit - perhaps ADD is a more appropriate destination for discussing the implications of neuropsychological literature than here.
 
Last edited:
Wikipedia said:
His findings were published in the mass-market book The God Gene: How Faith Is Hard-Wired Into Our Genes .. Hamer's study has not been published in the peer reviewed literature.

I can't really take it seriously if a proper study hasn't been conducted.. it seems some guy has just found some anecdotal evidence on the subject and tried to cash in on it.
 
I can't really take it seriously if a proper study hasn't been conducted.. it seems some guy has just found some anecdotal evidence on the subject and tried to cash in on it.

Well, of course he shouldn't be taken seriously, but the fact that his research remains unpublished doesn't exclude it from consideration by someone outside of the scientific community. His research, along with the results he (supposedly) obtained were compelling enough to spark my interest in a hitherto unstudied neuropsychological phenomenon. Regardless of how overblown his conclusions may have been, Hamer certainly broke new theoretical ground, which was enough to get my attention.

If you had done a little more reading, you'd be perfectly aware that his research was far from 'anecdotal.' Now, I'm not saying that the methods he employed were of admirable (or even decent) quality, but his approach was systematic and scientific in nature. I mean, you can't reasonably expect a scientist attempting such an unreasonably lofty goal on what I can only assume was a limited budget to come up with anything more rigorous than this. I don't endorse his 'findings' - I'm just interested in their putative implications, hence the purely speculative tone.
 
Top