Transcendence
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2006
- Messages
- 2,505
I'm going to graduate soon with a biochem BS. I did one semester worth of research in inorganic chemistry my freshman year, but besides that I have little research experience. Either I'm lazy, I spent too much time getting high, or none of the biochem professors' projects really captured my imagination. I like to believe the reason is mostly the latter, but it's probably a mix of all three. I never did any internships because they are insanely competitive nowadays. You have little chance of bagging an NSF grant unless your GPA is near perfect (like 3.8-4.0).
Even though my grades are quite good and I'll be graduating in 3 years with honors, I realize I have little chance of getting into a good graduate program because of my lack of research experience. My plan is to look for a job after graduation that incorporates lab work. I may apply to grad school after a few years if I see fit. Right now, I don't want to limit myself to a specific field of study because my interests are so varied.
My question is, do graduate committees value school research vs work research equally, or do they prefer one over the other? I know that most places require recommendation letters from professors rather than employers.
Even though my grades are quite good and I'll be graduating in 3 years with honors, I realize I have little chance of getting into a good graduate program because of my lack of research experience. My plan is to look for a job after graduation that incorporates lab work. I may apply to grad school after a few years if I see fit. Right now, I don't want to limit myself to a specific field of study because my interests are so varied.
My question is, do graduate committees value school research vs work research equally, or do they prefer one over the other? I know that most places require recommendation letters from professors rather than employers.