Foreigner
Bluelighter
Nobody said your experience wasn't real, they just said that it wasn't due to any psychoactive effect from a particular substance.
I would never tell somebody they didn't experience something, however if they took 0.1 mg of Valium and said that they felt completely sedated I would say that it wasn't from the Valium, categorically.
When you look at the actual scientific evidence and you see that the dose of safranal needed to provide protection to pentylenetetrazol seizure was 145 mg per kilogram, you realize that from the 25 pieces of saffron that you made tea from you weren't going to get any appreciable benzodiazepine like sedating effect.
The following paper describes administration of safranal (the main essential oil distilled from saffron) at 90 mg , 180 mg, and 360 mg per kilogram to mice to determine if it increased sleep in mice that were given pentobarbital.
90 mg per kilogram did not cause any change meaning it had no activity.
180mg/kg did elicit a response.
Even if you allometrically scale that to a human by a factor of 10 that means a 70 kg would need
1260 mg or 1.26 G. Of actual safranal essential oil to get that effect. We could say that somewhere between .62 and 1.26 g would be needed, neither of which you would approach from your saffron tea.
Now this does not mean you didn't experience something. It just means that all evidence points to the fact that it was something other than the effects of saffron that caused you to feel relaxed, considering the safranal content of saffron stigma is from 0.2 to.22 percent.
This is just a complicated way of saying that you know better than I do if what I experienced was placebo or a genuine effect from saffron.
I assure you it was the latter, I don't really give a shit what else you have to say about it. You're not me and you don't inhabit this body.
You can't use a scientific study to tell somebody in a conversation what their reality is. Statistics are about probabilities, not certainties, and you would know that if you had any scientific training whatsoever. You can't use statistics to make absolute statements. That is not the purpose of science. Stop it already.
A study adds supportive evidence or not to a greater body of knowledge. It doesn't make truth statements.
The best you can say is that the study does or doesn't support what I'm talking about. You can't say in absolute terms that what I'm talking about didn't happen. I wish the armchair science crowd of the internet understood this because I'm tired of explaining it.
Last edited: