• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Ridiculous prohibitionist garbage from the New York Post

Burnt Offerings

Moderator: Drug Culture & CEP
Staff member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,584
It’s reefer madness all across Gotham, following the state Legislature’s legalization of marijuana.

Potheads light up with abandon. The NYPD has instructed officers to ignore the possession, “burning” and even the open sale of up to three ounces of weed.

Technically, minors aren’t permitted to have access to the herb, and you’re not allowed to smoke up anywhere cigarettes are banned. Yet judging by the dank smell on every block, park bench and subway car, any restrictions on pot have gone up in smoke.

Some New Yorkers may recall a time not too long ago when even the sale of “bongs” and other pot paraphernalia was essentially banned in the Big Apple. Now “smoke shops” are everywhere. The fruits of progress, don’t you know?

It’s common for sophisticated people to observe that prohibition never works — just look at, well, Prohibition. Banning booze was a huge failure, right? Actually, no. Whether it was ultimately a good idea or not, the passage of the Volstead Act did, in fact, drive down consumption of alcohol to about 70 percent of pre-Prohibition levels.

And it only gets better after defending the neglected virtues of the freakin' Volstead Act! :LOL:

 
In with the real story.. not the self serving dissection presented by this openly slanted article. Alcohol consumption initially went down 70 percent but rapidly returned to 70% pre prohibition levels with the all the new violence created by the black market. So the only thing prohibition did was restrict alcohol consumption for the harmless true sheep, God bless your souls.

 
Last edited:
Top