Pure Consciousness......

[cire113]

Is it possible that all that exists is pure consciousness?

Out of this pure consciousness which we are connected to and everything in life is created....


Our whole purpose is to survive, evolve, and grow...

I think quantum physics is figuring this out; as all energy is the same and connected; and the amount of laws in place to make life even possible is nothing short of coincidence in my book.. We are on earth.. This IS it.. We are the only intelligent life form that we KNOW of in the universe .


From a macroscopic level as ONE giant organism to the microscopic of all the life on earth (humans)..


So we are therefore here on earth as a physical manifestation and representation of this consciousness?

 

[rangrz]

I think quantum physics is figuring this out; as all energy is the same and connected

Not only that is not right, it is not even wrong.

I really don't even know what to say to that. All I can assume here is that you've never studied quantum mechanics or modern physics in a formal context or even studied it informally by reading legitimate text books, journal articles or even the Wikipedia articles on it.

 

[L2R]

i think the misunderstanding is linked to the vague use of the word "energy" which is common in pseudoscience.

 

[cire113]

Is not everything made up of protons,electrons, and neutrons?

I am terrible at science; but I realize science has proved some basic things..

The DOUBLE SLIT experiment

The Infinity problem

The measurement problem

Schrödinger's Cat

Unified Field theory...


But basically it comes down to science does NOT know what the fuck is going on;

Reality is an illusion

 

[P A]

quantum physics...Reality is an illusion

Lol, closed.

 

[ebola?]

What use is the concept of consciousness if all in the scope of empirical purview is consciousness? Then would "consciousness" even mean anything?
...
While I think that any physical or ontological description will need to come to grips with how consciousness arises out of the non-conscious, I also think that consciousness appears to play a special role in observation in physics. While it could be the case that any pair of quantum systems in interaction can sufficiently cause a wave-function collapse (or decoherence over time, etc.), there isn't a possible experiment where a conscious observer is uninvolved (someone has to view the recording, observe the indirect consequences, etc. prior to any knowledge of the eventual fate of the object of observation), so it becomes very challenging to infer anything about how quantum systems behave in the absence of an observer.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around Rangrz' example of the schrodinger-paradox printer thought experiment. What is the array of possible alternate ontological interpretations of what occurs?

ebola