• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Pedophilia in the News

Status
Not open for further replies.

mal3volent

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
40,123

A former GOP Senate staffer has been sentenced to more than a decade in prison after pleading guilty in a case involving child pornography.

A federal judge sentenced Ruben Verastigui, 29, of Washington, D.C., on Thursday to 151 months in prison on a federal charge of receipt of child pornography, the Department of Justice announced.

Verastigui was arrested in February last year and pleaded guilty the following July.

Federal prosecutors say Verastigui, formerly a digital strategist with the Senate Republican Conference, was active in an online group devoted to trading child pornography and discussing child sexual abuse.

The Senate Republican Conference has previously said Verastigui “has not worked at SRC since July 2, 2020.”


Verastigui was a digital strategist for the RNC in 2017 and 2018, working on social media advertising for political committees backing former President Donald Trump, according to Verastigui’s LinkedIn page. The digital strategist also worked for the Senate Republican Conference and for a nonprofit group called Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions. An anti-abortion activist originally from San Antonio, Verastigui spoke at the March for Life in Washington in 2013, according to a video clip posted online.

Mehta’s sentence for Verastigui was seven months more than the minimum of the range of 144 months to 188 months permitted under a plea deal he struck with prosecutors last year. When Mehta accepted the guilty plea last July, he indicated he was not binding himself to that range and might reject the deal, returning the case for trial. But at Thursday’s court session, the judge agreed to a sentence within those parameters.

 
FPyVdoFWUAwA-dC


 
FPyVdoFWUAwA-dC





"Jackson complained that current sentencing schemes don’t accurately measure the severity of child porn offenses, because computers, the Internet and digital cameras make it “so easy” to collect, store and distribute illegal porn today."

I see her point, although personally I would have no issue giving these fucks the maximum sentence, I think it's a judge's place to interpret the laws and have the option for leniency

these pedos were trading pics in chat rooms, not producing them

there is a difference in my eyes

so many of our laws are outdated and preceded the internet and our modern age
 
Here's some 2022 articles about pedo teachers:






 
Here's an extra disgusting one from last year about 1st graders


Here's the video



The new sex-ed curriculum in New Jersey tells students as young as 9 to go watch videos produced by AMAZE (Producer of Video Above)

Here's an opinion in a newsletter about AMAZE

 
Last edited:
Here's a disgusting one from last year


Here's the video



The new sex-ed curriculum in New Jersey tells students as young as 9 to go watch videos produced by AMAZE (Producer of Video Above)

Here's an opinion in a newsletter about AMAZE


Nasty

9 year olds don't need sex-ed

I'm glad I don't have children because I'd make some of these pervert teachers swallow their teeth
 
Does anyone else find it weird that one of the top political threads on BL is about pedophilia?

is it really that big of an issue in the world right now?

or have people been brainwashed to suddenly care about it so much?

why is this suddenly such a big issue suddenly in 2022? (Other than Fox news/the right weaponizing it as some fucking insane conspiracy for political gain?)

we should be talking about the ice melting, the 1% sucking up all the power and technology, world hunger, social justice, etc....

yet people are hyperfocused on various pedo news....

"big media" indeed.... their influence transcends news into twitter, youtube, everything... people forget a lot of these platforms are paid influencers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
these pedos were trading pics in chat rooms, not producing them
just want to expand on this and it's legal definition

Back in the days of rotten.com and subsequent internet gore websites, I have vicariously viewed these websites. I have witnessed murders, beheadings, torture, gore, etc... vicariously through these websites, videos, pics.

While this material isn't the same thing as sexually abusing children... just imagine it was illegal to view them.

I didn't conduct these videos, I didn't do anything illegal, I would certainly never harm someone... (I don't enjoy watching these anymore, I did it more for the shock value when I was younger... and I regret it, I've seen things I can never unsee)... and it was very easy to access not just one but MANY of these videos, all at once.

it's not the same as actually committing the crime, unless you want to call me a psychopath murderer terrorist

.......so I don't freak out when a judge gives 20% under the maximum sentence for sharing pics in a chat room, on a similar principal...

saying a judge is lenient on pedophiles due to a cherrypicked handful of thousands of cases she handled is simply propagandized bullshit

the woman is simply trying to be as fair as possible and has a hell of a lot more understanding of the law and constitution than any of us

"Even a goddamn werewolf is entitled to legal counsel." Hunter S. Thompson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
just want to expand on this and it's legal definition

Back in the days of rotten.com and subsequent internet gore websites, I have vicariously viewed these websites. I have witnessed murders, beheadings, torture, gore, etc... vicariously through these websites, videos, pics.

While this material isn't the same thing as sexually abusing children... just imagine it was illegal to view them.

I didn't conduct these videos, I didn't do anything illegal, I would certainly never harm someone... (I don't enjoy watching these anymore, I did it more for the shock value when I was younger... and I regret it, I've seen things I can never unsee)... and it was very easy to access not just one but MANY of these videos, all at once.

it's not the same as actually committing the crime, unless you want to call me a psychopath murderer terrorist

.......so I don't freak out when a judge gives 20% under the maximum sentence for sharing pics in a chat room, on a similar principal...

saying a judge is lenient on pedophiles due to a cherrypicked handful of thousands of cases she handled is simply propagandized bullshit

the woman is simply trying to be as fair as possible and has a hell of a lot more understanding of the law and constitution than any of us

"Even a goddamn werewolf is entitled to legal counsel." Hunter S. Thompson

1) you weren't masturbating to the murders and beheadings, were you?
2) even if you were, there aren't dead bodies walking around for you to molest.
3) even if there were, they aren't living children.
4) children are innocent and must be protected
5) if you view or save child porn, you are just as sick and vile as the ones producing it
6) they should all receive the maximum sentence
7) they are all a threat
 
1) you weren't masturbating to the murders and beheadings, were you?
2) even if you were, there aren't dead bodies walking around for you to molest.
3) even if there were, they aren't living children.
4) children are innocent and must be protected
not arguing any of that!
5) if you view or save child porn, you are just as sick and vile as the ones producing it
6) they should all receive the maximum sentence
7) they are all a threat
that's the issue

look I'm not trying to defend pedos lol

I'm just looking at it from a judge's perspective

is copy and pasting a jpeg really just as bad as molesting a child?

is it? take the emotion out of it....

I'm certainly not trying to defend their actions simply being ultra logical about it...
 
if you are downloading it and jerking off to it, you will most likely at some point molest a child yourself. These people can't control themselves.

you can't prove these guys were jerking off to these images

just like you can't prove I was snorting the ounce of meth I was arrested with

look I'm not defending pedos, only desperately relying on the sanctity of our justice system

flawed as it may be....

we all rely on it
 
Why else would they have them 😂 ?
why would someone like me who would never do such a thing watch the most violent gore videos on the internet?

I certainly never jacked off to it, but I guess it was "exciting" in some sense

It's less about defining it and more about the LAWS I'm referencing

Like murder... in the 1st, 2nd or 3rd degree

there is a legal distinction, beyond our disgust for someone's behavior
 
Glad to see such a thread. Without going into much detail I've been one of a huge collective world wide counter actively engaged in Pedophilia and child abuse down for over a decade.

Now is against BLUA to dox (but let it be known we have thousands of targets that have been arrested and targets more)

PM if your part of the 'Collective' (you will know what I am talking about).

Theres things are usually not made public when it involves non-law enforcement informants however most of us were fine.

This was an operation a few years ago which I assisted multiple branches of QLD,SA and AFP child exploitation operations.

In my mind WHEN IT INVOLVES CHILD ABUSED IT IS NOT SNITCHING.

 
Glad to see such a thread. Without going into much detail I've been one of a huge collective world wide counter actively engaged in Pedophilia and child abuse down for over a decade.

Now is against BLUA to dox (but let it be known we have thousands of targets that have been arrested and targets more)

PM if your part of the 'Collective' (you will know what I am talking about).

Theres things are usually not made public when it involves non-law enforcement informants however most of us were fine.

This was an operation a few years ago which I assisted multiple branches of QLD,SA and AFP child exploitation operations.

In my mind WHEN IT INVOLVES CHILD ABUSED IT IS NOT SNITCHING.


wow, I didn't know you were involved in that operation. I remember reading about it. You aren't able to go into more detail about your involvement? I understand if you can't.
 
wow, I didn't know you were involved in that operation. I remember reading about it. You aren't able to go into more detail about your involvement? I understand if you can't.
More than happy to via DM mate, or maybe email? or DM off the BL main platform. Its just something Ive been involved in for over a decade (not just pedophilia, anything thats against human rights, equality and helping bringing those accountable) We are very busy ATM, with a range different operations, Would you be fine with me DM'ing you? I just dont want to go into to much publicly for obviously reasons.

I makes me happy that you care about this stuff.. The probably is so so much bigger than most would imagine. :X
 
More than happy to via DM mate, or maybe email? or DM off the BL main platform. Its just something Ive been involved in for over a decade (not just pedophilia, anything thats against human rights, equality and helping bringing those accountable) We are very busy ATM, with a range different operations, Would you be fine with me DM'ing you? I just dont want to go into to much publicly for obviously reasons.

I makes me happy that you care about this stuff.. The probably is so so much bigger than most would imagine. :X

yeah man send me a message or on discord
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top