Nature or nurture -- Are you who your brain chemistry says you are?

phr

Bluelighter
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
36,678
Location
St. Charles, IL
Nature or nurture -- Are you who your brain chemistry says you are?
Amy Shaw
Society of Nuclear Medicine
8.12.08



Reston, Va.Researchers using positron emission tomography (PET) have validated a long-held theory that individual personality traitsparticularly reward dependencyare connected to brain chemistry, a finding that has implications for better understanding and treating substance abuse and other addictive behaviors.

In a study to identify biochemical correlates of personality traits in healthy humans, researchers focused their investigation for the first time on the role of the brain's opioidergic (or endorphine) systemspecifically, the connection between an individual's level of reward expectancy and the brain's ability to transmit naturally occurring opiates. The study included 23 males with no history of substance abuse who were administered Fluoro-ethyl-diprenorphinea radiolabeled chemical that binds readily to the brain's naturally occurring opiate system and then underwent a PET scan.

The scans were compared to the results of each participant's Cloninger temperament and character inventory, a questionnaire that assesses human personality based on four dimensions: novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence and persistence. The comparison revealed that the binding to opiate receptors in the ventral striatuman area of the brain known to be a central part of the reward systemcorrelated narrowly to the individual degree of reward dependence. The participants who skewed toward a high need to feel rewarded by approval were also those with the highest uptake of opiates, or endorphins, in the reward system.

"Our main finding was that reward dependence is the only personality dimension correlated with opiate receptor binding, and that positive correlation was restricted to the ventral striatum, which is considered the key area of the human reward system and of the development of addictive behavior," said Peter Bartenstein, M.D., professor of nuclear medicine, Ludwig Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. "This correlation means that people with high reward dependence have a high concentration of opiate receptors available in that area, while people with low dependence have fewer opiate receptors."

According to the researchers, the biological purpose of the human reward system is to initiate behavior essential for the maintenance of the individualfor example, food intakeor the speciesfor example, reproduction. Therefore, food or sexual stimuli lead to an opioid-modulated dopamine release in core structures of the reward system and subsequently induce the sensation of craving. Modern addiction research maintains that genetic or acquired abuses of the reward system are the central basis for the development of addictive behavior. This latest finding suggests that individuals suffering from a relative endorphine deficit in their reward system show increased reward dependence and are probably more at risk for developing addictions.

"This is a novel finding and will provide a deeper understanding of the functional relation between human personality, neurobiology and addictive behavior," said Mathias Schreckenberger, M.D., professor of nuclear medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany. "Understanding the central role of neurotransmission processes in certain brain structures for the expression of psychologically defined constructs such as personality will make a great difference in the future of medicine."

The researchers foresee PET becoming the preferred imaging method for individualized therapy in a range of disorders caused by addictive behavioursuch as drug abuse or pathological gamblingbecause it is the only method able to show specific local changes in different neurotransmitter systems (opiate, dopamine and serotonine) involved in addiction. These changes are different in different people and different types of addiction.

The researchers further suggest that PET could be used to predict a favorable response to treatment with drugs that block agents such as morphine, heroin or alcohol from binding to opiate receptors and may one day aid in determining treatment of other psychiatric diseases, such as personality disorders. PET may also play a central role in the development and preclinical evaluation of new anti-craving drugs since it enables researchers to investigate noninvasively the in vivo pharmacological effects of these drugs on the reward system.

The group's next study will delve deeper into the description of the neurochemistry of human personality and expand study sample sizes, according to Gerhard Grnder, M.D., professor of psychiatry and psychotherapy, Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

"One of the more interesting aspects of this study," he added, "is that it shows that PET technology is capable of detecting subtle biochemical differences in the brain in healthy persons, which may ultimately be responsible for what we consider the individual personality. This has far-reaching implicationsnot only for choosing the best individual treatments, but also in discussions of an individual's free will."

###

Coauthors of "Opiod Receptor PET Reveals the Psycholobiologic Correlates of Reward Processing" include Mathias Schreckenberger, Peter Bartenstein, Andr Klega, Hans-Georg Buchholz, Christina Mller, department of nuclear medicine, and Armin Scheurich, department of psychiatry and psychoterapy, all at Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany; Gerhard Grnder, department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Ralf Schirrmacher, Esther Schirrmacher, department of neurology and neurosurgery , McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Gjermund Henriksen, department of nuclear medicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany.

About SNM

SNM is an international scientific and medical organization dedicated to raising public awareness about what molecular imaging is and how it can help provide patients with the best health care possible. SNM members specialize in molecular imaging, a vital element of today's medical practice that adds an additional dimension to diagnosis, changing the way common and devastating diseases are understood and treated.

SNM's more than 17,000 members set the standard for molecular imaging and nuclear medicine practice by creating guidelines, sharing information through journals and meetings and leading advocacy on key issues that affect molecular imaging and therapy research and practice. For more information, visit www.snm.org.

Link!
 
The nature versus nurture debate analyzes the relative importance that these two concepts have regarding the development of a person’s physical and personality attributes. On one side of the debate, nature is the idea that a person’s development has to deal with hereditary or genetic influences. In contrast, nurture is the idea that a person’s development has to deal more with outside influences and their environment (Kail & Cavanaugh, 2007). There have been studies conducted that will support both perspectives and other studies that believe it is a combination of both factors. I personally believe in the latter perspective that the combination of nature and nurture both contribute substantially to our growth and development.

When a baby is born they are coming into a world without any prejudice or negative predispositions. He or she is born a tabula rasa or a blank slate that is ready to take in the ideas that they come across each and everyday. This blank slate has no propensity to any one side and can be painted in a positive way or a negative one if so desired. The young mind can be molded and shaped to biases and prejudices, as can be seen by children who are subjected to racist ideas. These children are brought up to hate and told to believe that people that do not have the same skin tone are inherently evil. The following statement is sad, but true about the continuous cycle of hatred that continues to revolve in the world. When young children are left alone in a group to socialize amongst themselves they do not ostracize any one group based on color, gender, or ethnicity. Children are carefree and only want to play and enjoy life. This is the nurture part of the debate and how we develop certain ideas about things. In this scenario it was shown how people can develop certain prejudices that they were not born with, because of environmental factors that come into place.

However, if you do not have the genetic predisposition to be a tall person, then chances are you will not be tall when you grow up. I can attest to this statement, because my parents were not very tall so I knew my chances of being tall were very limited. People tried to tell me that eating vegetables would make me taller, but that idea did not turn out to be true. This is the nature part of the argument and how hereditary factors contribute to certain characteristics. The environment in which I lived in did not have a factor on my overall height. If I did not have the proper nourishment this could have been said to be a factor, but that was not the case in my situation. However, in my family there is a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and the doctors are well aware of this fact. It is for this reason why the doctors are constantly on me about staying away from salt and high fat foods. If I were to eat anything I wanted then my environmental factors could negatively impact my genetic predisposition for cardiovascular disease. This is not to say that I will not develop cardio vascular disease, but my limiting the intake of certain foods lessens the chance of this becoming a problem later on in life (Hedner, Narkiewicz, Oparil, & Kjeldsen, 2006). In this example the nurture aspect could have a negative effect as far as what I eat, because I already possess certain risk factors that I was born with.

Nature and nurture both have an important role in the growth and development of people as can be seen from the following examples. However, I do not believe that they affect each attribute of the person equally. Nature affects certain parts of the body differently than the nurture aspect and vice versa. It is the combination of both attributes that ultimately decide what type of person you will grow up to be.;)
 
Top