• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

Lateline on opiates - quick fixes don't work

bit_pattern

Ex-Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
8,128
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2014/s4083602.htm

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Broadcast: 08/09/2014

Reporter: John Stewart

An eleven year study by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre has found that long term treatment is the key to turning heroin addicts' lives around
Transcript
EMMA ALBERICI, PRESENTER: Short-term treatments for heroin users like rapid detox often fail and lead to relapse. That's one of the key findings from the longest study of heroin users ever undertaken in Australia. The research released tonight finds that long-term treatment is the key to turning addicts' lives around. The 11-year study was conducted by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre. With this exclusive report, here's John Stewart.

JOHN STEWART, REPORTER: Each year about 65,000 Australians seek treatment for heroin addiction. Now a landmark study has interviewed 615 addicts to determine what treatments are working. And the report's authors say there was one clear finding.

SHANE DARKE, NATIONAL DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH CENTRE: What we know works is long-term, stable treatment. Now, by that I'm thinking of either maintenance therapies - that's where people are given substitutes like methadone of buprenorphine - or residential rehabilitation, drug-free residential rehabilitation.

MAREE TESSON, NATIONAL DRUG & ALCOHOL RESEARCH CENTRE: We don't have a quick fix or a magic bullet to heroin dependence. It's a problem that's going to last for quite a long period of time - 10 years - a very long period of time.

JOHN STEWART: The report suggests that short-term treatments like rapid detox centres, which offer Naltrexone implants, are less likely to work.

SHANE DARKE: I think it's important to understand that short-term treatments like just detoxifying somebody, is not - is actually probably increasing the risk of death. In fact we know for a fact it increases their risk of death.

JOHN STEWART: After following drug users for 11 years, the study found that: 10 per cent of heroin users had died, 25 per cent were still using heroin and 50 per cent were still in treatment programs.

One of the big surprises of the study was a dramatic decrease in the reliance on crime as a source of income.

At the start of the study in 2001: 24 per cent of heroin users relied on crime as their main income. By 2012, at the end of the study, only two per cent were committing crimes to buy drugs.

Researchers say that long-term treatment programs had radically reduced crime among the group.

GARTH POPPLE, DIRECTOR, WE HELP OURSELVES: Treatment does work, and even though this study that you're been looking at still cites people using heroin after 11 years, everybody has been seeking treatment. Over 50 per cent of people have been seeking treatment. Guess what? We've got a much more reduction than 50 per cent reduction in crime. We're still way so far in front.

JOHN STEWART: The other key finding was that depression remains a barrier to successful treatment, with one in four users suffering major depression.

MAREE TESSON: For the first time, 10 years ago we actually interviewed and asked people about the depression that they'd experienced. And overriding over 10 years, depression was the strongest influence on whether they did well or didn't do well.

JOHN STEWART: The report also dispels the myth that heroin users grow out of the drug as they get older.

SHANE DARKE: We've got people dying of overdoses from heroin in their 60's now. We all thought that - it was believed that everyone matured out. Heroin users would mature out, it was called, when they hit about 30. It's simply not the case. And now we've had heroin in Australia since the '60's, since the Vietnam War. We've had enough time to actually see what happens in the long term.

JOHN STEWART: The researchers say that casual heroin users are a myth.

SHANE DARKE: They're like the Bunyip - they're frequently reported but rarely seen. They don't turn up amongst the deaths, they don't turn up in treatment. There's no real evidence - for every one casual user, I could show you 500 heavily dependent users.

JOHN STEWART: The report offers hope to the families of addicts and says even if it takes more than a decade, a genuine road to recovery is possible.

John Stewart, Lateline.
 
Shane seems to think that because casual users don't seek treatment or turn up as bodies, they don't exist. Maybe he doesn't understand what "casual use" means?
 
^ I was thinking the same thing to be honest, why in the fuck would a casual user of any drug seek treatment for their use, if they wanted to stop they would simply stop...
 
Its a bit like Ebola.

Every time they open a Ebola treatment centre in Liberia it gets swamped with previously unreported/unknown cases.

This Shane bloke argument would be that up and until they presented to the centre they didn't exist.

Unfortunately the really depressing fact is that Opioid Treatments in Australia are massively underfunded. There are waiting lists and only people who are pregnant or who have AIDS get to jump the queue. Because of the underfunding and heavy restrictions the clinics have to spend a fortune on security and the buddy system to prevent theft.

The restriction when it comes to do dosing and the lumping of all people, irrespective of their issue, under one regime is problematic and causes issues that the clinics and the studies choose to ignore.

The doctors are too busy getting their books and chapters published to present evidence that would contradict their conservative orthodoxes. Not to mention bullying patients into bad treatment plans.

So no the Opioid treatment system in Australia has significant flaws. However from looking at in the context of no regime well obviously its better then nothing.
 
I love the way the article uses numerical values that = 11, and form other patterns, you can tell it was a systematically written article to encourage heroin use and not stop it


bit_pattern said:
a genuine road to recovery is (more) than possible.

John Stewart, Lateline.

That's all he needed to say. Encouragement to heroin users goes along way but a choice to use a drug is a choice to use a drug, heroin is a contradictory drug when things are overseen and overlooked as the user is to caught up in the characteristics and experience that opiates provide coupled with time progressing over it's course.

You can quit any drug and decide to use it again whenever you want at the drop of the hat, and yeah i know.. easily done. Not everyone is like that but a positive attitude is what's needed, Know your drug, Know yourself, It's what you know, not as much who you know, but who you know can be a positive if you need help and can't see it, but if you can't see it and your comfortable do you really need help anyway,

That is the question.
 
Top