• CD Moderators: someguyontheinternet
  • Cannabis Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules

JWH and the the nasty naphalene

Timothy Leary

Bluelighter
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
61
ok, people are commenting on JWH-018's nasty looking napthalene group, I wonder how toxic it really is?

However this has not been mentioned in other threads. Propranolol.

It is a betablocker and some people take doses up to 100 mg a day! the worst part is not only does it have an oxygen DIRECTLY ON THE NAPTHALENE, if anyone doesn't know why aromatic compounds are carcinogenic it is because the body finds it hard to get rid of them except through epoxidation. they turn into benzene oxide compounds which are very uncomfortable breaking that aromatic ring and very reactive, so they like to react with your DNA, something that is not exactly healthy. Napthalene is not as bad as benzene. But tolouene (methylbenzene) is comparatively vary safe next to other non-substituted aromatics, this is because the body then gets the chance to oxidize it to benzyl alcohol (not phenol!) and then to benzaldehyde and finaly to benzoic acid, a much less toxic process.

The thing is that Propranolol has an oxygen on the napthalene directly, much worse than JWH which is already an alpha-ketone derivative, it is halfway through its metabolism to naphthoic acid!

For the TL;DR crowd- JWH has a toxic component, but it doesnt look half as bad as a normal betablocker which has a higher dosage.

What do you guys think?
 
Perhaps the mods could move this to ADD, there has been extensive discussion of JWH and napthalene there. And several of the regulars posters seem to have a great deal of knowledge about metabolic pathways.

Those who don't wish to try to decipher the talk there can avoid napthalene by using JWH-250, which does not contain it.
 
Metabolism via ring hydroxylation of the naphthyl moiety is not necessarily bad or carcinogenic, for instance see the metabolism of duloxetine. The problem is moreso with the non-etherized compounds for some reason, for instance both duloxetine and propranolol have the naphthol moieties as an ether and are not problematic (that much), but pronethalol is very carcinogenic. For some reason straight carbon chains or no carbon chains are the big problem from naphthalene, which I can't explain at the moment.

it's been discussed, check out the jwh threads in add
 
Top