• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Is rebellion good? Think Rosa Parks and Satan, our Lady and Mistress.

Gnostic Bishop

Gnostic Bishop

Bluelighter
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
2,745
Is rebellion good? Think Rosa Parks and Satan, our Lady andMistress.

Matthew 10: 16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in themidst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=Michael+Angelo's+Eden+Vatican+collection&biw=1014&bih=519&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=9CYXVPXsKI-VjALRvYC4Cw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ


Both of the females named, Satan and Rosa Parks, are justtwo of many examples that show where rebellion has improved humanity and can beused to fight evil.

They would have liked this fast marching tune.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STiuregSvHg


Is raising hell a good idea?

=================================

To women.

If raising hell is a good idea, why are you sitting on yourhands and not being the good citizen you should be in terms of pushing for equality?

You are the majority.

Has the shame that your despicable religion wrongly createdin you killed your pride?

Hell, we have a Gay Pride Parade and they are a minutepercentage of the population.

How about a Woman Pride Parade? Or can you not muster yourfellow oppressed?

Or are you, --- analogically speaking, --- waiting for thewhite men at the cool front of the bus to politely ask you to change seats withthem?
=============================
=============================

To men of the Abrahamic cults. Christians, Catholics andMuslims.

Remember what God said. “He shall rule over you”.

Why are you men not ruling properly and allowing your chargesto shirk their duty to society in not demanding equality?

Why are you sitting on your hands? Should a ruler not ruleand order a just thing?

He shall rule over you says that you are ultimatelyresponsible for your wife’s shirking of her duty.

Do get busy all of you Abrahamic men. Christians, Catholicsand Muslims.

Justice says that equality is overdue thanks to your lazy wives.Raise a little hell on her buttock, politically speaking, that is.

It is your duty to society and especially to your fellow men.Women have been our burden long enough. Fuck God. Let us give women their due.

========================================

To all.

Change the labels in this quote to women, minorities, gaysor children being brainwashed by religions and it shows what we should bethinking and doing for each other.

"First they came for the Jews, but I did nothingbecause I'm not a Jew. Then they came for the socialists, but I did nothingbecause I'm not a socialist. Then they came for the Catholics, but I didnothing because I'm not a Catholic. Finally, they came for me, but by thenthere was no one left to help me." – Pastor Father Niemoller (1946)”

My friends.

Religion came for our women a long time ago and still hasthem as captive to barbaric immoral non-equality thinking.

Should we not try to get them back?

Regards
DL
 
"Satan" is a thoughtform made real by humans feeding into it and not an actual soul created by God, as such. If people stopped giving it energy it would just dissolve into nothing. But the human soul has great creative power and so many giving their thought and energy to it has made this thoughtform real and alive like an actual being, in a way, but we also have the power to de-create it.

Lucifer talked about being devastated by being identified as "Satan" or the "Devil" but this thoughtform or invention is much older or from far before he came to Earth. It has existed as long as there have been beings worshipping darkness, i.e. long before this planet was made.
 
Last edited:
Ninae said:
"Satan" is a thoughtform made real by humans feeding into it and not an actual soul created by God, as such. If people stopped giving it energy it would just dissolve into nothing. But the human soul has great creative power and so many giving their thought and energy to it has made this thoughtform real and alive like an actual being, in a way, but we also have the power to de-create it.

Lucifer talked about being devastated by being identified as "Satan" or the "Devil" but this thoughtform or invention is much older or from far before he came to Earth. It has existed as long as there have been beings worshipping darkness, i.e. long before this planet was made.
Click to expand...

You may as well label what you write as fiction because that is what it is without you putting up some king of logic trail.

You are just making yourself look delusional to the point of boredom.

Why do you not start your own fantasy O.P..

Regards
DL
 
Proofread your (title, original) posts. There are always words that stick together when you copy/paste them from wherever. It makes them kind of a drag to read...
 
Last edited:
If grammar is your only comment then you are likely a part of the problem and not a part of the solution.

Regards
DL
 
What 23 said:
Proofread your (title, original) posts. There are always words that stick together when you copy/paste them from wherever. It makes them kind of a drag to read...
Click to expand...

It's ironic that he claims to think for himself, and that everyone else is a brainwashed idol worshipper, but then it seems he is basing what he believes off one man. GB are you being brainwashed and idol worshipping one gnostic guy who was (supposedly) revealed the true thoughts of God? What's his name again GB? Who wrote the 'song of God' that you base all your ideas from? I can't remember his name.
 
Honestly, you're just arrogant, GB. I've seen it in many of your posts.

Every single title post you make is in a different font (fine) than normal, and has every other word stuck to another (ugh). Your grammar is fine, but that is just being lazy. It bothers me to read it. I do but I'm kind of sore to respond. Its up to you to make things clear, within your means.
 
Last edited:
Satan translates to "adversary/obstacle" but I think has also been called the accuser. I believe Christianity was the first to assign Satan as a defined being (of those three). It may have been more workable before.

I guess I would say that rebellion, and being an obstacle, and having an adversary/obstacle, can work for the good. Being tested can strengthen.

I am not entirely sure about the order of things. I don't believe in 100% equality. I think generally we'll find that some are better at some things than others, a lot of times. I don't think women are less than, generally, but in ways there might be a perfect system that won't, generally, have us occupying the exact same function, always. This doesn't mean I agree with the roles religions have shoved them into, or restricted them to/from. But in this sense, religion has been a Satan... An obstacle. An adversary to. And perhaps it has done a lot of good, even if we suffer for it.
 
Last edited:
Gnostic Bishop said:
You may as well label what you write as fiction because that is what it is without you putting up some king of logic trail.

You are just making yourself look delusional to the point of boredom.

Why do you not start your own fantasy O.P..

Regards
DL
Click to expand...

You know, just because someone doesn't share your viewpoints (which seems to be everyone), doesn't actually mean they are DUMB. And if you looked out from (your brand) of Gnostic Christianity window for a moment you might find this outlook isn't actually that unheard of.

God had nothing to do with the creation of darkness/evil. He gave us the freedom to create with it (basically the opposite of Him) if we choose. Though it's more a lack of God, or a nothing, than anything actually in itself ("negative energy" is just a lack of positive energy, it shouldn't really be attributed its own existence).

And of course God would never have created a god of evil to compete with Himself. That would be going too far. This is entirely our own creation (in addition to that there are many enough powerful, evil beings who could appear to us as something like that) and we can un-create it.
 
Yes rebellion is often good as you show in your examples. In the case of Rosa Parks, Gay rights, etc, an oppressed minority was able to create change for the better.


Gnostic Bishop said:
You may as well label what you write as fiction because that is what it is without you putting up some king of logic trail.

You are just making yourself look delusional to the point of boredom.

Why do you not start your own fantasy O.P..

Regards
DL
Click to expand...
You don't have to be mean. That kind of New Age belief system is surprisingly common where I live. There are better ways to question somebody's beliefs and comments. The only thing that's going to happen with the kind of comment you made is the thread gets derailed and after 10 pages of insults and accusations of being crazy, someone gets banned and the thread locked.
 
"New Age" is so confusing because you never know who are speaking to you or who you are dealing with. It could be the re-incarnation of Mother Mary, or someone with a Doctor's degree in Theology, or someone who are just making things up and have no clue what they are talking about.

I've seen a lot of both and try to be discerning, but I've also come across some great teachers and "channelers", also in real life who were quite impressive and ingeneous in what they had to teach (personally I appreciate that kind of originality as opposed to brand it as "crazy").

Much of my writing could also be seen as a form of channeling as I can receive ideas and images from "above" quite clearly at times (or am being trained as a kind of channel for the angelic kingdom) so I just write down whatever comes into my mind.

Some attempts are less good than others, but I've nailed some concepts down pretty well as well. However, this is problematic for many to relate to, or just the idea of it.

We all resonate with different things, I guess.
 
When I said "New Age," I had in mind trance channelers, as in "the Age of Aquarius" and "mystic crystal revelations." I was writing that post at a cafe in the lower Haight neighborhood of san francisco. Somebody 1 table away from me was talking to her friend about learning to channel at channeling classes taught locally. If you can channel, that's fantastic, but I have no idea what it really is. Does the message come from within you or from something outside of you? Is it a form of gnosis? I agree that overall, "New Age" is very general and means many things.
 
Last edited:
There's only a fine line between "channeling" and feeling highly inspired.

So it's not that much different from that. Like, when you fall into a kind of creative trance, and the ideas just keep flowing without stop, seemingly from out of nowhere. All creative people would know that state. I experience it more like that than like my consciousness being taken over by another being or receiving messages from outside myself. Apart from a few times where I've had what I experienced as telepathic conversations with Christ, but most will just think you're crazy when you say something like that.

Anyway, I have a channel who channels my guardian angels for me, and they tested me on my telepathic ability or ability to receive images they sent me. I've already talked about this before. But they sent me 25 images and I got 23 of them right, there was a meaning to all of them. One of them was of the big castle Neuschwanstein south of Germany, like I've mentioned before, I just said "I see a beautiful castle on some big mountains in the water" (I think the meaning of that was to show me that there is beauty in this world apart from telling me I had spent time there as a tourist in multiple lifetimes). It's kind of weird to explain, but it's like they just enter your head just like it's something you just imagined yourself. Only there was no logical reason for me to visualise those things and I got all apart from 2 right.

So they all came from outside and I guess it means I have quite a good ability to receive the ideas or inspiration they "send" me. But someone would have to have experienced or seen this for themselves, in themselves or others, to believe it, otherwise they will just think it's a lot of crazy crap, yes, I am aware of that, and rationalise it away in any way they possibly can. The extent of your clarity or ability to "receive" will be variable from time to time, though, but sometimes it just all flows through you without really having to engage your mind in the way you normally do when trying to come up with ideas.

I also think I'm mostly inspired by Archangel Gabriel, who's my main guardian angel. Gabriel is the "Messenger angel", or the one who's very eager to bring spiritual messages to humanity, and inspired Mohammed to write the Quran, for one thing. So I think I take on some of his qualities or am like one of his apprentices, in a way. As I am often filled with the urge to bring messages of a spiritual nature to humanity, in any way I can, and I think they are mostly his type of ideas. Not that I think I can receive them completely clear. And this was just written as a reply to your questions, in case someone starts complaining about it.
 
Last edited:
I have just recently realized that I think jesus may have been the original antichrist. By this I mean look at all of the wars and bloodshed cast upon this world in jesus' s name. And in the same sense the idea of Satan or lucifer. Have actually brought great and positive changes to the world. If we look throughout history particularly the one antichrist we all acknowledge...Hitler. I think the world and the human race learned a more and practical lesson from him and his actions. We stopped as one race the human race and made clear his actions and ideals would not be tolerated. So his life and actions brought about more peace and unity then jesus ever could. I say all this not being any bit religious or as some may think a neo Nazi or something along those lines. I look at the lessons learned from both men and know we learned and developed more as a whole by what hitler did then by what jesus said and claimed.
 
Tromps said:
It's ironic that he claims to think for himself, and that everyone else is a brainwashed idol worshipper, but then it seems he is basing what he believes off one man. GB are you being brainwashed and idol worshipping one gnostic guy who was (supposedly) revealed the true thoughts of God? What's his name again GB? Who wrote the 'song of God' that you base all your ideas from? I can't remember his name.
Click to expand...

To base all of ones ideas one just one source is foolish.

What is with this childish baiting of yours?

Is it supposed to impress?

If you have an issue then lets chat instead of childishly throwing stones.

Regards
DL
 
What 23 said:
Honestly, you're just arrogant, GB. I've seen it in many of your posts.

Every single title post you make is in a different font (fine) than normal, and has every other word stuck to another (ugh). Your grammar is fine, but that is just being lazy. It bothers me to read it. I do but I'm kind of sore to respond. Its up to you to make things clear, within your means.
Click to expand...

Strange that so few complain. It is your reading ability. That and I an French so --- mange moi.

Regards
DL
 
What 23 said:
Satan translates to "adversary/obstacle" but I think has also been called the accuser. I believe Christianity was the first to assign Satan as a defined being (of those three). It may have been more workable before.

I guess I would say that rebellion, and being an obstacle, and having an adversary/obstacle, can work for the good. Being tested can strengthen.

I am not entirely sure about the order of things. I don't believe in 100% equality. I think generally we'll find that some are better at some things than others, a lot of times. I don't think women are less than, generally, but in ways there might be a perfect system that won't, generally, have us occupying the exact same function, always. This doesn't mean I agree with the roles religions have shoved them into, or restricted them to/from. But in this sense, religion has been a Satan... An obstacle. An adversary to. And perhaps it has done a lot of good, even if we suffer for it.
Click to expand...

What good has discrimination without just cause done for us?

Regards
DL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top