Foreigner
Bluelighter
I recently found the following passages from the Bible - 2 Peter 2:20-22 (In NKJV version to be more straightforward and understandable)
Do you agree or disagree that it is better to have never found the light than to find it and then go astray from it? Why so?
Do you think that the path of straying from enlightenment in favour of the opposite direction is one that is generally a choice to follow? Why?
This theme is repeated among all religions and spiritual systems I have come across.
It has two meanings which are practically universal:
1) Ignorant evil is more forgivable than evil that knows the truth but does evil anyway. "Forgive them Father for they know not what they do." The karmic infraction committed by the knowing evil is much worse.
2) When you know the truth you have a responsibility to follow it and stand up for it. If you turn your back on it and commit evil then you are more damned than the person who never knew the truth.
My personal view on this is that there are many "awakenings" in life, not just one. It's possible to fall back into ignorance again, but not completely. I don't think enlightenment has anything to do with knowledge. It's a state of consciousness, one that can occur and de-occur. For some people awakening is temporary and for others it is permanent. There is no pattern.