I think its just a paradox that lies within myself that makes me not believe in this method. While i absolutely 100% see the benefits of psychadelics, their contribution to society and the entire spiritual change & enlightenment I've experienced with them; i still at some point must realize that hallucinogens can be taken for what they are but in the end i am still an addict. I have a hard time believing that a switch can just be turned off and the allure that the life has for me and the twisted thought patterns i have about how "good" drugs made me feel can just be forgotten. Even psychadelics themselves have been a slippery slope for me because they lead me to believe its okay to use them. Just like its okay to drink. Basically its never a drug that cures another drug you know? Some reliable data would be helpful i just think ibogaine treatment is still in its infancy and not enough data has been shown. I have only just started hearing about it though.
Well it's not that simple. As I said, it's not a magic cure. But it is certainly a lot more helpful than doing nothing or a conventional rehab. I believe this from personal experience (with ayahuasca, not ibogaine, although they are very similar in their use to treat addiction), the experiences of many people I know, the experiences of many people I have talked to and heard about, the research that has been done (yes it's not a ton but it's very hard to get funding to research something that is not going to make the pharmaceutical companies money), documentaries I've seen, and doctors/healers I've spoken with who use these treatments.
Personally I think it
is ok to use psychedelics, so I don't understand how that is a "slippery slope".
I also don't understand why it should be impossible for one drug to be a treatment for addiction to anther drug. Ibogaine and ayahuasca are not at all addictive and there have been very few reports of any lasting adverse effects and no deaths when taken without other drugs or severe pre-existing health issues. They are plants; everything that affects the body/brain is technically a "drug". They have also been used for literally 1000's of years, which is more than we can say about pharmaceuticals. *I would say ayahuasca is much safer than ibogaine and that is part of the reason I choose it.
I don't know quite as much about ibogaine as I do ayahuasca, but MAPS currently has a number of studies on ibogaine underway.
Pub Med has a number of papers about ibogaine but I am not able to access them all. Unfortunately the usual scientific method doesn't always lend itself to assessing the value of this kind of therapy, because the way that the ibogaine or ayahuasca is administered and by whom have a lot to do with whether or not it will be successful. For example, taking the whole-plant extract is a soothing forest retreat setting, by an experienced shaman or doctor who understands the traditional use, in conjunction with other therapies, is very different from taking an isolated or synthesized compound in a hospital bed with men in lab coats hovering over you. And personally I think that success is defined by overall reduction in addiction and reduction of harmful behaviours, rather than solely feeling no withdrawal symptoms and/or achieving a certain period of time 100% abstinent from all drugs.
I would honestly just be searching through all the info available online to find specific links to particularly notable reliable studies, but I can do that if you want. I also think that there is value in anecdotal evidence.
If you want some recommend reading/films about ayahuasca I can post some.