• ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️



    Film & Television

    Welcome Guest


    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
    Forum Rules Film Chit-Chat
    Recently Watched Best Documentaries
    ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️
  • Film & TV Moderators: ghostfreak

Film: The Aviator

Rate it

  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/1star.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/2stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/3stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/4stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • [img]http://i.bluelight.ru/g//543/5stars.gif[/img]

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3

goatofthenever

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 19, 2003
Messages
4,183
Location
The Americas
I thought a thread would have been already started for this film, but alas i could not find one.
I wrote a review of The Aviator for my film class, so i figured i might as well post it here.

Martin Scorsese’s most recent film, The Aviator, is based of the early 1900’s millionaire Howard Hughes(Leonardo DiCaprio). It follows the eccentric Hughes in his career from the late 1920's to the mid 1940's. All aspects well known of Hughes are incorporated in this film including air planes, film, obsessive compulsive disorder, and of course women.
This film is very reminiscent of Scorsese’s last film “Gangs of New York”. They are both very long, too long. When a movie is almost three hours long it must stay fresh throughout and drag very little, “The Aviator” unfortunately did not meet these requirements. As a result the movie became quite repetitive and consequently dragged in parts. Also, I find the actor who portrays Hughes, Leonardo Dicaprio, hard to take seriously. He does not come across as an adult, thus making him hard to fit in the place as a 20’s playboy.
The movie did to a good job sticking to the major theme, aviation, while still using other parts of Hughes’s life. The scenes that tell the story of Hughes’s flights are what put the majority of excitement into this film. Even if you find the rest of the story slow, you will be satisfied when Hughes goes back to his planes. The special effects of the flights are very detailed and with the accompanied music, it is guaranteed to get you excited. However considering the length of this film, there are many planes for Hughes throughout. Each flight, however stimulating, is very similar. While the film starts exciting it doesn’t have much more to go for the remainder, which is over two hours.
The other two aspects of the Hughes’s life worked well as an offset to his aviation. Scorsese did a very good job in letting us feel Hughes’s pain as a germphobe. Dicaprio’s best acting in this film came from his obsessive-compulsive germ scenes. Anytime Hughes’s obsessive-compulsive disorder came up, we could feel it and understand what it is that Hughes’s was feeling. The “playboy” aspect of Hughes’s life was also drawn into this movie, and provided a romantic side. The story follows Hughes’s involvement with Katharine Hepburn. This romance causes some of the slow parts, but many women would probably enjoy this part of the film. While Katharine Hepburn is the main romantic interest, there are other women in Hughes’s “playboy” life. Unfortunately the other women are on the screen for such a short amount of time we barley can get their names. These other women are introduced but nothing is really developed between them and Hughes, leaving the audience wanting more.
If you’re a Scorsese fan, don’t expect something like Taxi Driver or Goodfellas, just expect a fairly average movie and you’ll be able to enjoy it. If you did like Scorsese’s Gangs of New York, then this movie is definitely for you, seeing as how both films are extremely similar. Overall I see this movie as everyone enjoying it, but not so many people loving it.
 
as with any scorcese film pretty much, i had a hard-on for the technical aspects of the film... some of those shots and some of the timing requires a sense for the craft of film-making that honestly captivates me. i think leonardo dicaprio was a detriment to the film, aside from that i really liked all of the other performances- especially blanchett.
 
there were moments in this film when i thought 'there's hope for cinema/art/humanity yet' but then there were others where i did not :\ a glimpse of greatness i think is a nice way to describe what this movie gave- not greatness itself, unfortunately.

i dont know. i think it was the story that ran a bit dry at certain points and made it drag for me or something... i thought that leo was definitely only a good actor in this role too.
 
I though Leonardo DiCaprio was fucking amazing. After a while i began looking at him in a completely different way. He pulled it off so well. The film was pretty long, but i was longing to see where Leo would take the character next.
 
excellent movie.

i'm not really a dicaprio fan but he did a great job. the starpower in the film is somewhat distracting -- there are so many recognizable faces that it took me a moment to adjust and put people into character -- but the payoff is worth it. cate blanchett and alec baldwin give fantastic performances, and scorsese is, of course, a genius.
 
Look at how much Howard Hughes undertook in his life, and taken in context, I would expect a 3 hour movie from him. Leo, especially when covering the aspects of Hughes insanity, but also as a millionare playboy, was amazing. The technical work, though, is what set this movie apart. I can think of a couple pf SCENES that are worth the price of admission alone.
 
Poll added

popcorn.gif
 
I love this film. It's perhaps a little bit too long for me but the performances and the technical aspect of the film make it most enjoyable.
 
"Snuff!?!"

It's a solid film with solid acting, entertaining as are all works by Scorcese but not his best. Seems Marty brings out the best in Dicaprio.
 
Top