Originally posted by xxx
I have had numerous PM's, applauding my "bitter" analysis of Quentin Tarantino on this board.
'cause we all know that when a lot of people think something, it
must be true
Aside from that, when discussing him face to face with people, I have opened their eyes to his plaigiristic tendencies...
as brecht said (echoed by godard and other prominent and respected film-makers), "art is made from plagiarism". all an artist does is take what they see in the world and interpret it their own way. if this means stealing something from a previous piece of working and placing it in a new context, then i commend their foresight and ingenuity. creating something a piece of art isn't always about creating something entirely new.
If you were in the room with me, you would understand me a little bit more, instead of just labelling me as "bitter" because I am concerned about the immense popularity of extremely violent, pointless films.
the film isn't pointless. i recognise from your posts on this forum that you love the cinema, so surely you of all people should recognise (whether you
like it or not is irrelevant to this) that the film's
point is to allow tarantino to explore his love of film, the film-making process, and to pay homage to his heroes like leone et al.
At least my comments are analytical and convey some sort of thought process about the film being discussed rather than just sucking his balls and oohing and aahing...
i, despite quite often being quite aggravated by them (

), actually enjoy reading your posts because of this very fact. though we rarely see eye-to-eye, i'd still prefer to read a thorough analysis such as yours than a one line "it was good" response. however, i feel that you don't always respond to claims brought against your argument properly. perhaps i just have a personal bone to pick because you still haven't replied to my *many* posts in the
amelie thread (...go on

), but i feel this is a fairly valid point.
this is a forum. Negative opinions need to be heard, just as positive ones do.
i agree with this
Because I am a film-maker and he is the best example of the terrible state that cinema is in today.
actually, people like michael bay are the best examples of this (and bruckheimer, not that he's a director). at least qt has some respect for cinema's history.
The Matrix was a wonderful film and so the sequels are instantly accepted as at least good, because to call them absolute shit makes you reconsider your opinion about the first one.. and that would make you look foolish...
i
love the matrix.
reloaded and
revolutions are shite. though i was anticipating both the sequels enormously, i had no trouble reaching these negative conclusions as soon as i'd seen them. obviously your comment wasn't *directed* at me, but it's still true that not everyone is so obsessed with their opinion being "right" or respected that they will not renege on their comments.
Explain to me how Kill Bill is in any way intelligent.
I don't think it was even intended to be intelligent.. I think it was supposed to be a ridiculous, over-the-top farce of a film... That was apparent to me before the first shot when a Star Trek quote came up on the screen.
though i *can* see why people dislike the story behind the film (which, of course, is flimsy at best) i enjoy the film's intelligent referencing of tarantino's obsession with cinema past, his playful characterisations (pei-mai comes to mind from the sequel, though i realise we're not really discussing that), his wonderful dialogue, and the composition of his shots (the snow garden, the shadow fight to name a couple).
--
anyway, i can't believe i haven't posted in this thread. obviously, i love this film (and its sequel..probably a little more). the kurosawa-inspired blood gushing is absolutely comedy, the anime portions are brilliant in their intensity, and despite their being very little actual story, i enjoyed watching the bride's perseverance and struggle to avenge what is ultimately one of the biggest losses a human can endure.
i thought the performances were great (including uma), and i thought the cinematography in this (probably due to qt's chance to reference film after film after film from his extensive love-list) was as good as he's ever made it. set design was pretty fantastic too. though i still prefer a film that
is willing to go a little deeper into the human psyche, or alternately make a political statement, tarantino's films ooze style and above-all-else, entertainment.
everything has its place, and if we're talking fun, violent, humorous action...well, tarantino does it best
