I'm in a class called "The Economics of the Underground Economy" and the professor wants us to write an 8-10 page paper concerning some aspect of the underground economy. A lot of people are writing boring papers strictly about the history of a drug etc. I'd like to write a little more in-depth paper that actually uses economics. However, my creativity seems to have left me and I'm drawing a blank.
The only ideas I have so far are:
(1) The media keeps talking about RCs as substitutes and replacements. However, given the way extra competition should work, they are not in fact substitutes/replacements because they have not lowered the price of the "original" drugs.
(2) The cost of the war on drugs is very high (enforcement, trials, incarceration, etc). Drug dealers are rational; they begin dealing drugs because it is often the best option available to them. Would it be cheaper for the government to give out one time transfer payments (or a monthly stipend) to those at risk, and in exchange they enter into a binding contract that would punish them severely if they were caught with drugs (the thinking being that the transfer payment replaces the need to deal drugs for income, and giving a person $20,000 is cheaper than paying for the police to arrest him, trial to convict him, and jail to incarcerate him).
Anyone have any ideas? Hopefully I can get a discussion going and some interesting ideas will pop up.
The only ideas I have so far are:
(1) The media keeps talking about RCs as substitutes and replacements. However, given the way extra competition should work, they are not in fact substitutes/replacements because they have not lowered the price of the "original" drugs.
(2) The cost of the war on drugs is very high (enforcement, trials, incarceration, etc). Drug dealers are rational; they begin dealing drugs because it is often the best option available to them. Would it be cheaper for the government to give out one time transfer payments (or a monthly stipend) to those at risk, and in exchange they enter into a binding contract that would punish them severely if they were caught with drugs (the thinking being that the transfer payment replaces the need to deal drugs for income, and giving a person $20,000 is cheaper than paying for the police to arrest him, trial to convict him, and jail to incarcerate him).
Anyone have any ideas? Hopefully I can get a discussion going and some interesting ideas will pop up.
Last edited: