Drug cartels overwhelm police [great story]

erosion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
3,182
Drug cartels overwhelm police
Los Angeles Times
July 8, 2007


The message came on police emergency radio: An army of drug traffickers with machine guns mounted on their pickup trucks was headed toward this town of 5,000 people on the Arizona-Mexico border.

Like a sheriff in a western, police chief and part-time schoolteacher Juan Bracamontes gritted his teeth and assembled his 15 officers, who had nothing better than old .38-caliber revolvers to face off against the enemy.

"Those who want to leave can leave," the chief said. "Those who want to stay and fight, line up behind me and we'll give it to them good."

One officer quit on the spot. The others deployed around the town, but not before taking off their uniforms and abandoning their patrol cars for unmarked vehicles.

In other Mexican towns, local authorities have not shown as much courage in the face of threats from cash-rich drug traffickers. Underarmed, under-prepared and often corrupt, small-town officials and police are the Achilles' heel of President Felipe Calderon's offensive against the nation's drug traffickers.

Calderon has made the battle to rein in Mexico's drug cartels the centerpiece of his presidency, committing large portions of the army and much of the federal police force to the effort. The cartels have been fighting one another for control of smuggling routes to the United States. The resulting violence claimed more than 2,000 lives last year, and the killings this year have been on a pace to exceed that toll. In the rural and border areas where smugglers operate, police frequently find themselves on the front line of the drug wars. Arresting a cartel operative might mean death. Even those who agree to protect one band of traffickers risk being attacked by rival gunmen.

Municipal officers account for 60% of the police force in Mexico, with state and federal police making up the rest. According to Mexican officials and analysts, city police and city officials receive a big share of the estimated $3 billion that drug traffickers pay in bribes each year.

Officials at Mexico's Public Safety Secretariat estimate that traffickers pay police an average monthly bribe of $500 to $600, roughly equal to a starting officer's monthly salary in towns such as Naco and neighboring Cananea.

"The training these officers receive is very precarious, as is their pay," said Raul Benitez, a professor at American University in Washington and a specialist in Mexican security issues. In many towns, Benitez said, the only requirement for becoming a police officer is being a friend of the mayor: The police force is a prime political plum.

These undertrained officers face an increasingly sophisticated enemy, as Mexico's drug cartels form small armies in which many of the "troops" have at least some military-style training.

Two days before the report of a "caravan of death" headed for Naco, as many as 50 armed men attacked Cananea. Five municipal officers were kidnapped and killed in the May 16 incident. Within hours, half of the 48-officer Cananea police force had turned in their guns and quit.

"We have no protection," several Cananea officers told reporters gathered around the town's police station. With allegations of links to traffickers swirling around the force, eight officers were fired, as was the police chief.

"On the one side organized crime is killing police officers, and on the other side the government is investigating and firing them," said Jose Arturo Yañez, a researcher at the Professional Police Training Institute in Mexico City. "No one is protecting them."

Security officials have resigned or been fired en masse in at least 18 states in nearly every region of Mexico.

Dozens have walked away from their jobs. A few have fled in the face of arrest warrants. Others, such as Orlando Valencia of Cananea, disappear from their offices.

Valencia was both the mayor's spokesman and the city emergency coordinator. In late May, he disappeared, and officials announced that they were seeking his arrest on suspicion of aiding drug traffickers in their escape after the attack on Cananea.

Even for those brave enough to serve in the country's most dangerous towns, discretion is usually the better part of valor. One high-ranking police official in a town in Zacatecas state explained the advice he gives his officers to keep them safe:

"I told them that if they see something suspicious, they should withdraw," said the official, who asked not to be named. "It doesn't matter what it is, just withdraw.... These people are well-armed and we just have the basics."

After an encounter with suspected cartel hit men, many officers in his town received telephone death threats. A good chunk of the force resigned.

"I don't know why they quit," the official said. "And you know what? I don't care."

The estimated 50 cartel hit men who descended on Cananea had attended a two-month camp to prepare for their assault, according to Sonora state authorities, who interviewed the surviving hit men. The training was led by a former member of the Hermosillo city police department. And federal officials said at least four of the gunmen were army veterans.

The hit men were working on behalf of a drug-trade organization allied with a local trafficker, Francisco Hernandez Garcia, also known as "The Two Thousand."

The Two Thousand had agreements with local police chiefs to protect his shipments, according to news reports. Such agreements are called compromisos here, a Spanish word meaning commitments or obligations. But the pacts were broken, setting off a series of violent incidents that climaxed with the raid on Cananea.

Home to 30,000 people, Cananea is famous for a 1906 miners' strike that helped spark the Mexican Revolution. Set amid the dun hills of the Sonoran Desert, it is a place where the daily routine of police work rarely involves anything more violent than a domestic dispute or drunken fight at a party.

All that changed early on the morning of May 16. Cananea police received word that a pair of officers had been attacked and beaten at a checkpoint outside town. Five officers were dispatched to assist them.

The five set off with shotguns and .223-caliber rifles recently provided by state authorities, though the bulletproof vests promised by the state had not yet arrived, officials said. When the officers reached the scene, they encountered four dozen cartel hit men: The officers surrendered without firing a shot; they were later tortured and executed.

The mayor summoned help. State and federal officers tracked the gunmen to a remote mountain settlement. In the ensuing gunfight, 15 suspected cartel hit men were killed.

"There hadn't been a battle like that here since the revolution," said Martin Ballesteros Rios, now Cananea's acting chief of police.

Gabriel Hurtado, the police chief at the time, was fired five days later; sources say he had abandoned his post. Although he faces no charges, there is a swirl of rumor. He hasn't been seen in the town since he left, officials said.

Ballesteros Rios stepped in.

The acting chief says he isn't worried about what might happen to him, despite warnings from friends and relatives. "My conscience is clean, because I don't have any compromisos with anyone," he said.

Thirty miles away in Naco, Mayor Jose Lorezno Villegas has fired six police chiefs during his two terms in office. He fired Chief Roberto Tacho in January; weeks later, U.S. officials arrested the former lawman as he allegedly tried to smuggle about 60 pounds of marijuana into the United States.

Tacho and his brother Ramon were part of a small circle that until recently controlled the police in three neighboring towns — Naco, Cananea and Agua Prieta. Ramon Tacho, the police chief of Agua Prieta, was assassinated outside his office in February by suspected cartel hit men.

In Naco, a windblown town of squat buildings hugging the U.S. border, there is a growing sense that the community is being drawn into a larger conflict.

On the day the drug traffickers' army was reported to be headed their way, town residents responded as though war had broken out.

Businesses and schools shut down. City Hall was evacuated and some officials fled to the United States. U.S. Border Patrol agents with machine guns took up positions on the roof of the border-crossing station in Naco, Ariz., which overlooks the Mexican Naco's small downtown.

Mayor Villegas was in Hermosillo, Sonora's state capital, picking up new 9-millimeter pistols and AR-15 rifles issued to his police force.

"We lived some very ugly moments that day," the 34-year-old mayor said. "By phone, people were telling me I should declare a state of siege."

But the report of the "caravan of death" headed for Naco turned out to be a false alarm.

At the end of the day, after the crisis had passed, Villegas arrived in Naco with boxes of pistols and rifles.

"Look at this beautiful thing," Police Chief Bracamontes said, taking one of the new pistols from its holster. "And this one too," he said, raising a sleek, black AR-15 rifle that was propped up against the wall of his office.

Like most of the new weapons, it still hasn't been fired.

Link
 
who the fuck wants to die to stop some junkie from getting high?
 
I said it long ago, the cartels are running the country in Mexico. This is david vs Goliath, and the Goliath are the cartels and David has no chance this time. End this madness already.
 
never have i felt more guilty about the policies that my country runs
if america didnt have a drug war, there wouldnt be a market in mexico. we caused their problem
 
The narco states really need to apply some political pressure on the US and other consumer nations for better drug laws. It's gotten pretty fucking ridiculous.
 
Crazeee said:
I said it long ago, the cartels are running the country in Mexico. This is david vs Goliath, and the Goliath are the cartels and David has no chance this time. End this madness already.


That's not true at all.

Legalization is the stone.

David just has to pick the @$&* thing up and sling it into Goliath's face.

It's been done before.
It can be done again.
 
Not even one snide remark on that horrible metaphor? I'm disappointed :(

I could have beaten Steven Colbert with that one for sure!
 
phrozen said:
The narco states really need to apply some political pressure on the US and other consumer nations for better drug laws. It's gotten pretty fucking ridiculous.
yes but sadly those that profit from the sale of the AR-15s for the Mexican state to use and other large companies have more influence .
 
Kalash said:
Not even one snide remark on that horrible metaphor? I'm disappointed :(

I could have beaten Steven Colbert with that one for sure!
Horrible metaphor? I was going to tell you how great of a metaphor that was, but didn't want to post uselessness (i'm all for clear, concise threads lol).

That metaphor is great and true - cartels are giants, the mexi gov is david. Very clear and true. David's stone, that one instrument that can kill the giant, is legalization. I thought your metaphor was actually very intelligent and made a great point.
 
although, I must say, I really wonder what woudl happen to the cartels if coke was made legal in america. I mean, let's face it, they control the supply and will continue to. People say that it's bad for the cartels if drugs are legalized, but I don't see it being that bad. Maybe I'm wrong and makin invalid assumptions here, but cartels hate wasting cash on counter intel operatives. They hate losing tons of products to seizures. They hate wasting cash on bribes. If coke were made legal, I can't see it being that bad for them. Prices on the streets woudl go down, so that would work its way back up the chain to the cartels, who couldn't sell a ton of coke for what they used to sell it for. However, they would be able to move much, much more product, operate more efficiently, etc.

Maybe someone more informed than I can answer this - if coke were made legal in the US today, would the cartels still run the game? For what reasons do you think they would hate legalization? As I said, even if it lowered street prices, their logistical efficiency should more than offset that. And let's not forget that more would be consumed, further offsetting the lower street prices. I dunno, I guess I just see it working better for the cartels if it was all legalized, they're legit businesses (legit wasn't the best word, but you know what i mean), and prohibition is their largest hurdle in marketin their products. If we had full legalization, I don't see how that wouldn't benefit the cartels.
 
there would be more competition for them. right now they are a monopoly. More competition means more regulations and everything that follows with the free market.
 
Kalash said:
Legalization is the stone.

David just has to pick the @$&* thing up and sling it into Goliath's face.


14.gif
 
bingalpaws said:
although, I must say, I really wonder what woudl happen to the cartels if coke was made legal in america. I mean, let's face it, they control the supply and will continue to. People say that it's bad for the cartels if drugs are legalized, but I don't see it being that bad. Maybe I'm wrong and makin invalid assumptions here, but cartels hate wasting cash on counter intel operatives. They hate losing tons of products to seizures. They hate wasting cash on bribes. If coke were made legal, I can't see it being that bad for them. Prices on the streets woudl go down, so that would work its way back up the chain to the cartels, who couldn't sell a ton of coke for what they used to sell it for. However, they would be able to move much, much more product, operate more efficiently, etc.

Maybe someone more informed than I can answer this - if coke were made legal in the US today, would the cartels still run the game? For what reasons do you think they would hate legalization? As I said, even if it lowered street prices, their logistical efficiency should more than offset that. And let's not forget that more would be consumed, further offsetting the lower street prices. I dunno, I guess I just see it working better for the cartels if it was all legalized, they're legit businesses (legit wasn't the best word, but you know what i mean), and prohibition is their largest hurdle in marketin their products. If we had full legalization, I don't see how that wouldn't benefit the cartels.

the fact is that the prices would drop by so much that the cartels wouldnt make any money whatsoever. I was watching a presentation from a leap member and im not sure how up to date the stats were but he way saying that in afghanistan, they pay people around $150-200 to smuggle a pound of heroin which eventually gets to the states so inflated in price that its somewhere at around $96,000. if it was legalized, it would be so cheap that they would either lose money or make no money at all and therefore would be out of business
 
I dunno, you guys are bringing up some important points that would hurt the cartels (increased competition, etc), but the cartels would still control it. Profit margins woudl definitely go down due to the increase in competition, but they save a ton of cash that prohibition caused them to waste. They could increase production easily, and due to the geography of where coke/heroin are coming from, I'm sure they could still operate as strong monopolies in their production areas, so they'd be selling more, it'd be cheaper (way, way, way cheaper) to get their product to the states, but they'd be selling it for less.

I'm not fully convinced that would be that horrible for them. If we were talking about US based cocaine producers (oxymoron), then of course the competition would be fierce, but the production is still done in columbia/middle east/etc, so I don't see why they wouldn't just sell a legal product here, while keeping prices a little inflated as a monopoly in their home countries (kinda along the lines of oil). Hell, you could even end up with peru, bolivia, and columbia forming one massive cartel that is restricting supply to the US, so they could keep prices inflated enough, and you've gotta remember that they lose a ridiculous sum to the costs of prohibition (bribes, lost loads, stealth equipment, counterintelligence equipment/operation, paying every middle man, plus you have to put a price tag on knowing that you could end up deported to the US where you'll serve life).
 
Read it yesterday in the LA times. Those type of narco related articles are in the times quit alot recently, considering that mexico had 4000 drug killings last year and are on course to beat that number this year.
 
you may start reading about it less - los zetas (gulf cartel's hitmen) supposedly threatened american reporters.
 
Top