Drug addicts used as organ donors

erosion

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
3,182
A serious shortage of organs means transplant surgeons are being forced to use body parts from drug addicts.

Between 2002 and 2007 some 450 organs came from donors with a history of drug abuse, which may affect the quality of the organ and raise infection risks.

The lack of viable organs is due in part to the fact that fewer healthy people are dying in car accidents, when organs can often be retrieved intact.

There is currently debate on whether to overhaul the system of organ donation.

The government is examining a proposal that everyone should be put on the organ donor register, unless they specifically "opt-out".

There are more than 8,000 people in the UK who need an organ donation but only 3,000 transplants are carried out each year. It is estimated that one person dies each day waiting for an organ.

Infection risk

According to UK Transplant, the body in charge of transplants, over the same period 10 hearts were also taken from people with a history of heart disease or who had suffered a heart attack.

Meanwhile, in fourteen of the cases of organs being taken from addicts, the donor had died of a drug overdose. In one case, a liver was taken from someone who had died of a paracetamol overdose.


ADDICT DONORS 2002 - 2007
146 donors with history of drug abuse
450 organs donated
212 kidneys
126 livers
39 hearts

Around three percent of the donations carried out between April 2002 and 2007 were from drug addicts, including those using prescription, over the counter, and illegal substances.

Although this may be only a small proportion of the 14,261 organs used in that period, surgeons agree that the standard of donations has dropped in the last decade, with organs more likely to come from older, sicker donors than younger, healthier people.

While procedures can be carried out to improve the quality of sub-standard organs, it is not seen as ideal.

In addition, while all organs are screened for diseases such as hepatitis or HIV, there is still a risk of passing on an infection which is yet to show up on tests.

This danger is particularly pronounced when the donors are intravenous drug addicts, who are more likely to be carrying hepatitis or HIV.

However a spokesman for UK Transplant stressed that while the use of less-than-perfect organs highlighted the shortage, surgeons would not put patients through the ordeal of a transplantation for an organ that was unlikely to offer substantial benefits.

He also noted that the drug abuse could be firmly in the donor's past, potentially relating to an addiction as long as 20 years ago.

Drug addicts used as organ donors
BBC News
December 10, 2007

Link
 
Last edited:
Oh my, that's quite strange. I can't imagine what it'd be like to hear a doctor tell you "we have an organ for you, but it's from a drug addict."
 
i just wouldnt want a heart from a coke head or meth head

or a brain from a gasoline huffer
 
"In one case, a liver was taken from someone who had died of a paracetamol overdose."

wow that is stuipid
 
MiissAngell said:
Amazing yet not so suprised. When your about to die and have an organ that's is less than perfect I'm pretty sure most people will take it


yeah but if first person who used it abused it so much they died (like the guy who died of an APAP OD and they used his liver), why would it even work at all in the second person?
 
Well your persective may change if you are the one waiting for the transplant one day, or die.

I mean if you're at that point it's hard to be picky. You'd be within your rights to refuse......but with no other options left you just may say "as long as it's working".
 
edarrin said:
with no other options left you just may say "as long as it's working".
Wel that's exactly the point.... APAP is hepatotoxic (toxic to the liver). If someone ODs on it, surely you wouldn't want to use their liver ever again?
 
Exactly. That's like getting a heart from a person that died of an enlarged heart.

Honestly though, I would much rather get a heart from a heroin addict than a "clean" person, or a liver from a pothead. Some drug use actually helps to keep you healthy. I'm absolutely sick of hearing about how drug use is a "problem." Maybe we should start putting lead in coffee and then when everyone gets sick we should tell them "too bad, you did it to yourself you stupid addict."
 
I don't see how this is controversial.

ANY organ is better than no organ, period.

As far as the organ donor system in our country, it's pretty f'd up.

When they legalize prostitution and other victimless crimes, they should allow people to sell their own kidneys for money.
 
I don't understand the transplant of the paracetamol poisoning patient's liver. Surely this is the organ that takes the brunt of the beating? Anyone want to fill me in?
 
Seems to me the whole "drug addict" angle here is pure sensationalism... the article is about a shortage of organs, not drug addicts. Can't think of any reason why the title, except that titling it "Organ donations coming up short" won't grab as many eyeballs.
 
MDPVagrant said:
Seems to me the whole "drug addict" angle here is pure sensationalism... the article is about a shortage of organs, not drug addicts. Can't think of any reason why the title, except that titling it "Organ donations coming up short" won't grab as many eyeballs.

this is an excellent point. Seriously you can add the words "drug addict" to any headline to get more reads. This sensationalism stems from the idea that drug addicts are somehow "less human beings" than a cop who is high on life and power. It is simply a scheme to turn peoples eyeballs and get the writer more attention. This article is about an organ shortage and is saying that comprimises have to be met in some cases. I am a healthy young 23 year old male, and i am an organ donor. I am sure even though i have a history of drug abuse my organs would be very attractive to a 70 year old man with cancer. If enough people don't meet the organ requirements they set, they are setting them too high and see this by people dying untill they lower the standard. If the doctor has to ask someone to choose to get my organs because i take drugs, i would rather them not get any organs. Throw mine away if you think using drugs in any form is wrong and good like finding anything.
 
Jack's Not A Dull Boy

On my drive's license,
of course I swrote
"pluck anythink ya want outta me"....
That's jus' good human nature...

Doubt anyone'd wan' my liver...


What are your laws in Europe/US regardin' blood donation...

I can't for a coupla reasons,
but the topics are fairly similar
(if not pls. mod move where most appropriate....)

PEACE
UnS
:)
 
^^ hahaha dude that was awesome

and who better to fight for it than nader. Im sure if he can get the standards up, he could get em back down.
 
This really is pure sensationalism. Using a drug addicts organs is perfectly rational. An alcoholic dies because his liver failed and he couldn't get a transplant. All the doctors have to do is throw out his rockliver and harvest the rest of the organs.


for soylent green.
 
Top