Did i do something dumb?

[cowboy dan]

So I was looking around for a legit research chemical vendor and didnt have any luck so I decided to look on ebay, not expecting to find anything. I found a listing thats said 2ct2 20mg and in the description it just said "20 mg 2ct2 must be 18 or older. The price was $9.99 and it said quantity 9.
So i 'buy it now' and pay and everything. I sent the guy a message and was like 'is this really legit?.' And he said yeah and he shipped it today.
a. Should I be scared its a cop or something?
b. Should i trust whatever he sends me in the mail?
Also he had 100% feedback, but nothing was research chemicals or anything like that before this auction.
Thanks for any advice, I hope SWIM isnt just high and paranoid.

 

[trocious]

let us know... if this doesn't get closed?

 

[WorldWarMe]

I just checked that out, and the price was 999... Did you really pay a thousand dollars for that?

 

[Violenza666]

Well you don't have to pay for it. lol

 

[cowboy dan]

I just checked that out, and the price was 999... Did you really pay a thousand dollars for that?

Haha no, he said he changed it to that after someone ourside of ebay bought the rest of it. but my paypal thing definitely says 9.99. After I saw the 999 thing I was fucking pissed cause I thought i got scammed

 

[Dreamatone]

Haha no, he said he changed it to that after someone ourside of ebay bought the rest of it. but my paypal thing definitely says 9.99. After I saw the 999 thing I was fucking pissed cause I thought i got scammed

9? 9 what? i'd be suspicious if he didn't have the weight. Also, make sure you use a reagent test to verify the validity if you do get something. Let us know how it turns out.

 

[woamotive]

I too am curious about how this will end . Let us know !

 

[marakhan]

sounds pretty darn sketchy to me

 

[atara]

Yes, you did something dumb, but you still might get 2c-t-2. I'd strongly advise not just taking whatever you end up getting sent, and instead investing in a testing kit.

 

[Bob Loblaw]

This doesn't fit BDD and is source discussion, so I'm going to have to close it. Best of luck.