• 💊 OTHER DRUGS 💊 Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Notable Threads 1 Notable Threads 2
    Dangerous Combos Addiction Support
    Emergency Services Benzo Guide v.1
    Addiction Stories Scary Case Studies
    Biology, Pharmacology & Drugs 101
  • Select Your Topic Then Scroll Down
    Alcohol Bupe Benzos
    Cocaine Heroin Opioids
    RCs Stimulants Misc
    Harm Reduction All Topics Gabapentinoids
    Tired of your habit? Struggling to cope?
    Want to regain control or get sober?
    Visit our Recovery Support Forums

crack and weed

S

stinky

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 9, 2001
Messages
84
Location
slc, ut, usa
In the past, my friends and I have put cocain on top of a bowl of weed and it seemed to give us cocain like effects. Then I read here that this doesn't do anything and the coke must be turned into crack. If I did this (turned the coke into crack) could I then smoke the crack by putting on top of a bowl or do you need a crack pipe?
thanks for the input
 
Crack (baking soda and cocaine) is the most common form of free-based cocaine.
You can put it on top of whatever you want to smoke... you can also smoke it out of a bic pen cap...
Why do you believe the people who told you you can't smoke coke on top of weed if you got "cocaine like effects."
By the way this is typically call'd a "chewie" (sp?) bowl (cocaine+weed).
Crack is a much higher high than cocaine by itself, and highly addictive. Be careful.
 
Crack, or any form of cocaine, is not *physically* addictive. However, if you do decide to smoke crack, be sure you have enough. Because for the first hour or so, nothing in the world will matter but...more crack.
You *could* try and smoke it on top of a bowl of weed, but most of the crack smoke would be lost. Besides, any effect you would get would be altered by the effects of the MJ.
Buy a glass dick, some chore boy and you're set.
 
I thought that the cocaine effects might be a placebo (as mentioned above). Why would you lose most of the crack smoke if you put it on top of weed?
 
Probably what it really was is highly refined freebase cocaine cleverly disguised as weed to sneak it in to the country.
In other words, you totally would have smelled it if there was crack anywhere. And you would have visably seen it unless the guy with the bowl played a trick on you and put it under the weed.
 
No, it was coke, I bought it and sprinkeled it on my self. I think it was most likely a placebo because the buzz was not much different then marijuana.
While we are on the subject, I just did about a gram of decent cocain and my whole parts of my body feel very numb and tingley. Also, I am clenching my jaw a lot. I have never used this much before and I am wondering if this is normal?
peace
[This message has been edited by stinky (edited 03 August 2001).]
 
You got the slang all wrong, CaNdIe RaVeRs call these "snow caps" because it sounds so harmless, nothing like Darnell Washington would have on da front powch of his dawg Tyrone Jenkins house down on MLK Jr. Blvd ... down there dey done be calling it "rock" and "weed", and the damn po-lice don't be taken to kindly to it!
If you're talking about cocaine hydrochloride, that is, "powder cocaine", then you're buring it up - if you want to smoke cocaine, you must make CRACK, or if you don't want to SMOKE CRACK then go ahead and pulled a KellyKandieRaver - cook "freebase" instead .. yes, "freebase" is simply the white-suburban-kids name for the drug CRACK COCAINE - but your friends don't know that! Back on track.. while you can apply a flame directly to cocaine, the HCl salt will just burn, and it might numb your mouth a little, but you WILL NOT GET HIGH! Why do you think people go through the process of adding baking soda to the spoon with the cokeand the water, stiring, heating then setting on an ice-cube, etc.. THEY DO IT BECAUSE THIS IS HOW YOU MAKE COCAINE SMOKABLE, and of course it DOES look fucking cool as shit to be able to make some mind-blowing crack!
So yeah, the lack of a high is probably because, well, you can't smoke cocaine without hacking it out first to liberate it's base from that hydrochloride salt that just burns ...
------------------
dot slash 0wn3d
 
Thanks for the info PhreeX. I am glad that you stopped me from wasting any more perfectly good cocain.
PLUR haha
 
Nope, I don't. But I heared(spelling?) that iv is the shit. Mabey next time. Read my trip report about cocaine ehh.
peace
 
well if you're wanting something to smoke with your weed, I would suggest crushing up some crack and sprinkling it into a small blunt, such as a cigarello. Just go down to your local ghetto, pick up a 20 rock, and spread it throughout the blunt, mostly in the middle. Don't put very much weed in there because that seems to take away from the crack. Instead of the placebo effects that you get when sprinkling cocaine hcl on your weed, the crack will very obviously enhance your high but it will still not be as good as smoking the rock out of a pipe.
 
time for some more kooky Los Angeles slang with yer host Uncle Corruption...
crack + weed = p-dogs
say it with me now...peeeeeee dawgzzzzz
smile.gif
 
Okay, its time for my statement about the solubility of solid substances in vapors, particular moving, hot vapors, that is probably going to piss PhreeX off.
Although cocaine cannot be 'smoked' in the normal sense... its burning point (under normal conditions and when in the presence of oxygen) is lower than its vaporization point... there IS an abnormal sense.
In this case, I imagine most of the cocain was burnt, and the effects were placebo.
But lets look at another case.
The inside of a ciggarette paper is coated with very fine cocaine. Tobacco is put into the paper. And it is smoked.
As the flame begins moving down the cig, any cocaine it touches is burnt and destroyed.
But lets looka t the cocain closer to the bottom... the part that hasn't seen flame yet. Moving over it, is a bunch of hot, churning, tobacco smoke.
You see... it hasn't reached its vaporization or burning point yet... (the points where ALL of its molecular bonds break down at a rapid rate), but it has reached a point where *some* of the molecular bonds, the 'stickiness' holding the individual molecules to each other, are beginning to be sacrificed!!!! Kind of like how even when water hasn't reached its vaporization point, it still has a tendency to 'lose' some molecules off the top of it to the atmosphere, because it loses certain bonds on occasion.
With cocaine, as those bonds are sacrificed, many extremely small pieces of cocaine are formed, a microscopic powder.
And as this tobacco smoke moves over that microscopic powder, some quantity of it is detached from the other molecules (by the 'wind'), dissolved, and carried with the smoke to the lungs of the inhaler.
Such is the tendency of solids to break down and be carried away in hot moving smoke, without vaporizing or burning.
Of course, even under the most ideallic circumstances, it would be a pain in the ass and you would lose most of the coke, but you can get minor effects if you do it the right way and use enough coke.
[This message has been edited by Timerare (edited 03 August 2001).]
 
Timerare -
Piss me off? Huh? I fucking loved it! A good, thought out response with some factual basis ... if only all posts could be of the same quality...
I follow what yer saying, but I am not totally sure this would apply in a situation where someone is just putting a bump on top of their bowl - it burns .. but the idea is coating the paper with coke, then smoking from that... well, if you want, lets come up with a desigin, we will test it and see if we can't actually find a way to make this work..
First they said "you don't inject OxyContin" ... we showed them how ... lets see what we can do with this!
------------------
dot slash 0wn3d
 
Mabey, after turning your coke into crack, you could put a crushed up rock in the butt of a hand rolled (mix it with the tobbacco). Then all of the hot smoke would vaporize the crack. Since you don't usually smoke the very end you wouldn't put direct flame/cherry on the crack and therefor you wouldn't waste any. But I think a crack pipe would work better. I haven't tried either so don't take my word for it.
peace
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top