Real_Illusion
Bluelighter
Now in another thread I noticed Banquo said not to consent to a search, even if a warrant is involved.
I'm curious, how does it help to not give consent even in a warranted search? Does your consent still make the evidence acquired not have the same value or something?
Also....I'd imagine that it might really hold some weight in probable cause cases. In my arrest, the cop did not have a warrant, I told him he must have a warrant to search my car, but he said he had probable cause. I told him I still didnt want him searching my car, he said "Well I'm searching your car, there's probable cause, I dont need a warrant." I simply said "I'm still not giving consent, but I'm not going to physically restrain you, so whatever"
so anyway, I'd like you to give me ANY information about consent, and also about probable cause and warrants if possible. This could even be turned into a guide, as I think it's something many of us druggies could learn a thing or two about.
I'm curious, how does it help to not give consent even in a warranted search? Does your consent still make the evidence acquired not have the same value or something?
Also....I'd imagine that it might really hold some weight in probable cause cases. In my arrest, the cop did not have a warrant, I told him he must have a warrant to search my car, but he said he had probable cause. I told him I still didnt want him searching my car, he said "Well I'm searching your car, there's probable cause, I dont need a warrant." I simply said "I'm still not giving consent, but I'm not going to physically restrain you, so whatever"
so anyway, I'd like you to give me ANY information about consent, and also about probable cause and warrants if possible. This could even be turned into a guide, as I think it's something many of us druggies could learn a thing or two about.