Chinese Drug Makers Skirt Mephedrone Ban

7zark7

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
2,560
Location
UK
[size=+1]Chinese Drug Makers Skirt Mephedrone Ban[/size]
June 9th 2010, 12:16 pm


Two months after Britain banned the party drug mephedrone, Sky News has learnt factories in China are making a host of new drugs to skirt UK laws.

Before mephedrone was scheduled as a Class B drug in April, it was openly sold online by dealers who offered express home delivery.

In internet chat rooms, users praised its effects which they described as similar to the drug ecstasy.

But now the same Chinese companies that used to manufacture mephedrone have come up with a raft of new chemical compounds that are not covered by British law.

Filming secretly and posing as customers, a Sky News crew visited the offices of Chemchallenger Biotech in Shanghai. They were given a free sample of a new "legal high" said to mirror the effects of mephedrone.

"Our British clients really like this one" said the company's director, Jacky Wu. He then offered to sell the crew up to 100kg of the drug, and said it could be sent to the UK by courier.

Mr Wu said his company "only operates within the law". But to avoid hold-ups at British customs he said he would mislabel the drug as a more commonly known chemical.

His operation is on an industrial scale. During a tour of his factory, Mr Wu showed off a rabbit warren of labs where workers toiled in white coats over vats of colourful substances.

He claimed one of them was a new form of chemical cannabis that would also be legal if sold on the street in Britain.

Before the ban on mephedrone, some experts warned it would be useless in the face of Chinese chemical companies who would simply come up with alternative drugs.

Mr Wu confirmed this, saying "there are thousands of these substances. There are new ones coming out all the time."

Though he graduated in chemistry from a prestigious Chinese university, Mr Wu was less forthcoming on the effects of his new compounds. "That's still being tested," he said. "We just make them."

Dozens of Chinese companies are in the same line of business. A representative from another laboratory told Sky News he had a distributor in London who supplied smaller dealers. He also openly admitted that the new generation of "legal highs" is dangerous.

"I was the first one to sell this on the market. But now many people don't like it," he said. "It's not good. It's too strong. Send you to hospital. Make you feel very ill."

The problem, say scientists, is that nobody knows what effect the new chemical drugs have on the body and the brain. One early forerunner to the current crop of synthetic drugs - a substance known as MPTP - caused dozens of people to develop irreversible symptoms identical to Parkinson's Disease.

Under similar legislation in Germany and the US, drugs can be banned on the presumption that they are dangerous rather than waiting for the results of a lengthy investigation.

In response to the Sky News investigation the Home Office announced it would be closing down the loophole on the new legal drugs that were emerging on the market.

A Home Office spokesman said: "We are planning to introduce a system of temporary bans for new emerging 'legal highs'. Temporary bans will allow us to make substances illegal while we seek full scientific advice."

Speaking on Sky News the former government chief drugs adviser Professor David Nutt said that banning the drugs would never work.

He suggested a controlled use of the substances was more effective, saying: "some regulated access, along the coffee shop model for cannabis in the Netherlands I think will have to come."

Mephedrone hit the headlines in March after the drug was linked to the deaths of two teenagers in Scunthorpe.

However, post mortems revealed no trace of the chemical in the blood of Louis Wainwright, 18, and Nicholas Smith, 19.

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) recommended a ban in March but the decision was criticised for being politically rather than scientifically driven.

Some drug campaigners believe that education on the risks of so-called legal highs would be a more effective way of combating the new generation of drugs.


Link: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20100609/twl-chinese-drug-makers-skirt-mephedrone-3fd0ae9.html
 
But now the same Chinese companies that used to manufacture mephedrone have come up with a raft of new chemical compounds that are not covered by British law.

The bastards! 8o How dare they not break the law…

Filming secretly…

Hmm… isn't that legally questionable? Typical media double-standards.

One early forerunner to the current crop of synthetic drugs - a substance known as MPTP - caused dozens of people to develop irreversible symptoms identical to Parkinson's Disease.

W?T?F?

In response to the Sky News investigation the Home Office announced it would be closing down the loophole on the new legal drugs that were emerging on the market.

Liars… it was in the coalition's Agreement for Government.

A Home Office spokesman said: "We are planning to introduce a system of temporary bans for new emerging 'legal highs'. Temporary bans will allow us to make substances illegal while we seek full scientific advice."

This scares me. As I think I have said elsewhere… how long is 'temporary'? I find it difficult to imagine the Government OKing certtain drugs after they have been 'tested'.

…which makes me wonder who is going to test them? How are they going test them? What parameters will they use to decide what's "safe" and what's "dangerous"?

:\
 
Dont confuse the system of 'temporary' bans as anything less then an easy way to circumvent your rights as a citizen. Same thing they did the in the US. Its a loophole the government uses to by-pass due process... You know, instead of leaking stuff to the media and show-ponying/making up storys, they just ban it and be done with it.
 
Ps. I like how david nutt is getting quoted alot.. and this article isnt as bad as it could be... it seems to poiint out the different sides of the story fairly well... and its good that they still havnt found out the real source of these drugs... chinese just copy, afterall..

MPTP ???
 
This guy is from a prestigious university wasting his knowledge making RCs... You could go to a tech college and take some organic chem and figure that shitout haha
 
Dis is wat u get when u want cheap.

Most RCs have little to no history of human use.

I still prefer my coke and harry:)
 
Ps. I like how david nutt is getting quoted alot.. and this article isnt as bad as it could be... it seems to poiint out the different sides of the story fairly well... and its good that they still havnt found out the real source of these drugs... chinese just copy, afterall..

MPTP ???


what do you mean? Then what is the actual source of these RC's?
 
MPTP was created when a demerol analogue was synthed with poor heat control, correct?

It had something to do with Demerol, I believe it was (supposed) to be an analogue of it.

They found people with the needles in their arms shaking uncontrollably.

This flow of designer drugs, many of which could be very unsafe, is a perfect argument for drug legalization. There are plenty of drugs out there with known effects and plenty of research showing them to be safe in reasonable doses. Opium, coca, marijuana etc. We've got plenty of great natural highs that the government has chosen to make illegal. Thus opening up the research chem market. :/
 
MPTP was created when a demerol analogue was synthed with poor heat control, correct?

The way the story's told, its more like a fundamental misunderstanding of the procedure. He started the acidification 50 degrees too hot it says. Then again, Grignard syntheses are so fickle that any number of things can go wrong and you have to anticipate the formation of some dehydration product and deal with it in your workup, even if your initial technique is flawless and performed under an inert gas and and and and

Which is why this:

You could go to a tech college and take some organic chem and figure that shitout haha

is simply not true (no offense to aparenz). Paper chemistry and benchwork are galaxies apart.
 
I'm not saying its easy, but the synthesis of mephedrone related compounds isn't anything you can't learn on your own (unless you are a rather dependent individual). Just look at the people out there that teach themselves how to make industrial quantities of acid and MDMA. Obviously it wouldn't be legal to teach yourself many of the procedures needed, but it can be done. These aren't exactly "breakthrough chemicals" we're talking about. This is the age of the interwebs where almost every lab procedure one wants to know about is a second away. Eleusis, Strike, and Casey Hardison are all good examples of self taught chemists in the age of the internets.
 
Last edited:
How is this news? They have obviously been doing it for years, it is the only way the legal high industry can adapt is by coming out with new drugs as legislation bans the old ones.
 
Or, for the shortsighted, the perfect argument to keep drug prohibition. Can't expect most people to put the effort into connecting the dots.

Wow. Never looked at it that way before. Maybe the drug war was a necessary motivating factor for humanity to start fully exploring the catecholamine pharmacophore.
 
Wow. Never looked at it that way before. Maybe the drug war was a necessary motivating factor for humanity to start fully exploring the catecholamine pharmacophore.
I never looked at it the way you think I looked at it before, either. Well, maybe I glanced at it a couple times, but never paid much real attention (I mean, I realized that the drug war had the consequence of new drugs being developed, the research motivated by the fact that they would fall outside existing drug laws, but never really reflected on the full significance of that). What I meant was that an influx of new, toxic recreational drugs would just add more fuel to the prohibitionists' fire, and that they wouldn't "connect the dots" to realize that the cause of the existence of these toxic drugs is the war on drugs. But I totally see the angle you're seeing, though it's not exactly an overall good thing.
 
Top