rm-rf said:
was this an attempt at humor?
if not, are you 12? and what is the focus on "she" anyways? do we have a misogynistic SLR mod? or merely another victim of the patriarchal state, echoing its deeply embedded fear of female anatomy?
rm -rf, I suggest you do the fucking IRL equivalent of typing of 'sudo rm -rf /*' to your brain.
rm -rf said:
in any event, crotch odor, in whatever form, in no way shape or form signifies any level of pathogenic activity
Because, there exist no pathogens which infection by may cause an odor. I am pretty sure, say, a raging infection of C.perfringens with myonecrosis could/would give rise to a profoundly unpleasant odour. Signify is a verbed form of sign a sign is a physical finding that indicates a disease. Thus, here, the finding upon physical examination of a person with such a disease process ongoing, one may expect to notice a [to quote the Merck Manual) "particularly foul odour".
While hardly likely you'll be hooking up with someone who has gas gangrene, my argument shows that a foul odour around the crotch is a sign of a pathogenic process. Holding that the premise "myonecrosis causes an odour" "myonecrosis is pathogenic" "myonecrosis can occur around the crotch" "a sign is a finding indicating a pathogenic process" have a truth value of 1
it follows your premise "crotch odour in whatever form in no way signifies a pathogen" must then, have a truth value of 0.
rm -rf said:
i fail to see the association with "scent" and disease. do you believe someone who smells like a bouquet of spring flowers cant possibly have HIV and Hep C and HSV2?
No, its very possible they have no odour. However, Hep C can lead to cirrhosis, which can cause fetor hepaticus, a scent on the breath which is a strong sign of cirrhosis.
In any case, the lack of or the finding of a single sign is generally not enough diagnose or exclude something based on, but to say that a sign has absolutely no chance of indicating a disease seems far fetched.
rm -rf said:
youre much more likely to die from irradiated foods, heart disease, and colon cancer while being a virgin, than you are by being a big slut.
While there is ambiguity here as to what you mean by irradiated, I am going to assume you mean the real/used form of high energy photon irradiation. How is this a higher risk than dying of STD (or anything). Lets review some elementary physics! Alright, there is more than one 'thing' called radiation. For the sake of this premise, I believe only electromagnetic(photonic) and particle (alpha, beta, heavy ions, blah blah go read the standard model) Now, as it tends to food, which lacks an innate accelerator in it. We may worry about EM radiation. (Y decay) or particle (a,b decay) from unstable nuclides in our food.
All things tend have some level of unstable isotopes in them due to the earth having them in its crust. We can't do much about that. They are rare and of little concern anyways. However, stable species can transmute into unstable ones after being irradiated. However, this only occurs if you bombard the correct starting material with the correct type of PARTICLE radiation. For example, subject 59-Co to a high neutron flux, you get a single neutron capture to 60-Co, which then decays via Y decay with a ~5yr halflife and bichromatic, high energy spectrum. This is bad for you. Do not eat 60-Co.
Now, EM radiation on the other hand, does not cause transmutation of nuclei. So, the X-ray or Gamma irradiation on your food, does not, can not, according all known physics, cause induced radioactivity in your food. Nor, does it, as far as I have read or heard, cause the production of new molecular species which are systemically toxic via gastric administration.
Again, it appears your premise "irradiated foods are more likely to kill you then infectious disease" has the truth value 0.
Now, explain to me again how{infectious disease} has no subset {signs} or that the subset {signs} has no member "odour" is a logically valid statement.
Also, tell me about how I'm a misogynist who is afraid of female human sexual organs. Cause dammit, I really can not remember hating woman, or having fear regarding female sexual organs. Oh wait! You made up some premises, jumped to a conjecture from them and presented it as having been proofed and thus now a theorem!
You can always ask them if they have any stds or ask them to go get tested with you.
.
