californialove760
Bluelighter
So in my AP psychology textbook I came across this: "Unlike alcohol, which the body eliminates within hours, THC and its byproducts linger in the body for a month or more. Thus, contrary to the usual tolerance phenomenon, regular users may a achieve a high with smaller amounts of the drug than occasional users would need to get the same effect."
I've found other statements like that in a few other places, can't really remember where, but I know I've seen them.
Anyway, this seems completely contrary to my own experiences as well as all my friends', and seemingly everyone on Bluelight. So my question is, why would they put something like that in textbooks and other sources? Admittedly my book is not the greatest resource; for example it cites one of Ricaurte's studies in the section on ecstasy, which was proven a faulty one... That one can be used as anti drug propaganda though, this one just seems like a random fact they got wrong.
Or is there any truth to it?
sorry if theres a thread like this already, I couldn't find it...
I've found other statements like that in a few other places, can't really remember where, but I know I've seen them.
Anyway, this seems completely contrary to my own experiences as well as all my friends', and seemingly everyone on Bluelight. So my question is, why would they put something like that in textbooks and other sources? Admittedly my book is not the greatest resource; for example it cites one of Ricaurte's studies in the section on ecstasy, which was proven a faulty one... That one can be used as anti drug propaganda though, this one just seems like a random fact they got wrong.
Or is there any truth to it?
sorry if theres a thread like this already, I couldn't find it...