• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: Xorkoth | Madness

(Article) Can Sufi Islam Counter the Taleban?

Jamshyd

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Aug 26, 2003
Messages
15,492
By Barbara Plett
BBC News, Lahore

It's one o'clock in the morning and the night is pounding with hypnotic rhythms, the air thick with the smoke of incense, laced with dope.

I'm squeezed into a corner of the upper courtyard at the shrine of Baba Shah Jamal in Lahore, famous for its Thursday night drumming sessions.

It's packed with young men, smoking, swaying to the music, and working themselves into a state of ecstasy.

This isn't how most Westerners imagine Pakistan, which has a reputation as a hotspot for Islamist extremism.

Devotional singing

But this popular form of Sufi Islam is far more widespread than the Taleban's version. It's a potent brew of mysticism, folklore and a dose of hedonism.


Now some in the West have begun asking whether Pakistan's Sufism could be mobilised to counter militant Islamist ideology and influence.

Lahore would be the place to start: it's a city rich in Sufi tradition.

At the shrine of Data Ganj Bakhsh Hajveri, musicians and singers from across the country also gather weekly, to perform qawwali, or Islamic devotional singing.

Qawwali is seen as a key part of the journey to the divine, what Sufis call the continual remembrance of God.

"When you listen to other music, you will listen for a short time, but the qawwali goes straight inside," says Ali Raza, a fourth generation Sufi singer.

"Even if you can't understand the wording, you can feel the magic of the qawwali, this is spiritual music which directly touches your soul and mind as well."

But Sufism is more than music. At a house in an affluent suburb of Lahore a group of women gathers weekly to practise the Sufi disciplines of chanting and meditation, meant to clear the mind and open the heart to God.

One by one the devotees recount how the sessions have helped them deal with problems and achieve greater peace and happiness. This more orthodox Sufism isn't as widespread as the popular variety, but both are seen as native to South Asia.

'Love and harmony'

"Islam came to this part of the world through Sufism," says Ayeda Naqvi, a teacher of Islamic mysticism who's taking part in the chanting.

"It was Sufis who came and spread the religious message of love and harmony and beauty, there were no swords, it was very different from the sharp edged Islam of the Middle East.

"And you can't separate it from our culture, it's in our music, it's in our folklore, it's in our architecture. We are a Sufi country, and yet there's a struggle in Pakistan right now for the soul of Islam."


That struggle is between Sufism and hard-line Wahhabism, the strict form of Sunni Islam followed by members of the Taleban and al-Qaeda.

It has gained ground in the tribal north-west, encouraged initially in the 1980s by the US and Saudi Arabia to help recruit Islamist warriors to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.

But it's alien to Pakistan's Sufi heartland in the Punjab and Sindh provinces, says Sardar Aseff Ali, a cabinet minister and a Sufi.

"Wahhabism is a tribal form of Islam coming from the desert sands of Saudi Arabia," he says. "This may be very attractive to the tribes in the frontier, but it will never find resonance in the established societies of Pakistan."

So could Pakistan's mystic, non-violent Islam be used as a defence against extremism?

An American think tank, the Rand Corporation, has advocated this, suggesting support for Sufism as an "open, intellectual interpretation of Islam".

There is ample proof that Sufism remains a living tradition.

In the warren of Lahore's back streets, a shrine is being built to a modern saint, Hafiz Iqbal, and his mentor, a mystic called Baba Hassan Din. They attract followers from all classes and walks of life.

'Atrocities'

The architect is Kamil Khan Mumtaz. He describes in loving detail his traditional construction techniques and the spiritual principles they symbolise.


He shakes his head at stories of lovely old mosques and shrines pulled down and replaced by structures of concrete and glass at the orders of austere mullahs, and he's horrified at atrocities committed in the name of religion by militant Islamists.

But he doubts that Sufism can be marshalled to resist Wahhabi radicalism, a phenomenon that he insists has political, not religious, roots.

"The American think tanks should think again," he says. "What you see [in Islamic extremism] is a response to what has happened in the modern world.

"There is a frustration, an anger, a rage against invaders, occupiers. Muslims ask themselves, what happened?

"We once ruled the world and now we're enslaved. This is a power struggle, it is the oppressed who want to become the oppressors, this has nothing to do with Islam, and least of all to do with Sufism."


Ayeda Naqvi, on the other hand, believes Sufism could play a political role to strengthen a tolerant Islamic identity in Pakistan. But she warns of the dangers of Western support.
"I think if it's done it has to be done very quietly because a lot of people here are allergic to the West interfering," she says.

"So even if it's something good they're doing, they need to be discreet because you don't want Sufism to be labelled as a movement which is being pushed by the West to drown out the real puritanical Islam."

Back at the Shah Jamal shrine I couldn't feel further from puritanical Islam. The frenzied passion around me suggests that Pakistan's Sufi shrines won't be taken over by the Taleban any time soon.

But whether Sufism can be used to actively resist the spread of extremist Islam, or even whether it should be, is another question.


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/7896943.stm

Published: 2009/02/24 05:55:03 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Print Sponsor
 
I have to say I somewhat agree with Kamil Khan Mumtaz in general. It seems like the violence of Muslims to non-Muslims isn't something that Sufism can easily cure. I wish it were the easy answer, but it seems like it is probably more linked to Israel, and modern external influence on them.

As far as intra-Muslim relations, I'm not sure Sufism could help that either. This is because that many Muslims somewhat dislike the more intense Sufis, as they believe that they can attain one-ness with Allah, which is very heretical for non-Sufis. I would be mildly afraid that if the Sufi movement gains too much momentum, then there may be another split within the Muslim community. Not that splitting of a religion is necessarily bad, but with the historical example of Sunnis and Shiites, it just seems like more violence could arise from this.
 
I (with other academic lefties) eat this shit up. :)
It would be an interesting irony, as mainstream Muslim practice appears to have come into being with the rise of modernity in the Arab world (and the modern nation-state) and then beyond (y'know, in SE Asia and India, where you find most Muslims), in explicit opposition to Sufi practices ties to ancient and medieval social and political practices. I think that mainstream Islam (and even Shi, in most hases) occupies a position somewhat analogous to what Protestantism did during Western Europe's 'modernization', albeit with distinct social and political consequences.

The problem is that I see it very likely that Sufi will anchor viable resistance. In almost all cases, mystical practices have been relegated to subaltern cultural frames, while 'feudalesque' or 'modernized' religions dominate.

I would look for sources of hope within heterdox interpretations of both Sunni and Shi doctrine, and according libertarian political and social extensions (I'm most familiar with El Fadl's stuff).

And what about Xianity's analogous issues? I think the chances for a similar transformation are even more remote. Almost all Xian mysticism has been excluded, even from heterodox sects. Our only hope might be further lurches toward secularization (a la the Deists of the days of yore).

ebola
 
I (with other academic lefties) eat this shit up. :)

Oh hell yeah. Yum!

Depends how you define 'counter'. Counter as in 'work toward the demise of', I'm afraid not. This is like asking whether the Boys and Girls Club can fix the inner city gang problem in the US. It's a great thing to have, and many benefit from it and are probably saved by it. But it doesn't get at the root of the problem in either case: RESOURCE SCARCITY AND GROSSLY UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION. There will be coalition violence wherever being violent is the only way to guarantee you'll have enough for you and yours. The Muslim world's violence is directly related to the bleakness of living in a part of the world that's falling behind in standard of living, quite rapidly.

But counter as in 'provide a balancing effect', then most joyfully yes! It's a very good sign that this alternative to hardline Wahhabism is still available to those who'd benefit from it. It shows that Wahhabism's reach is not as total as its leaders would wish.
 
It's true, ebola-- among most of the Islam population in my country (where Wahhabism is common), Sufism is "haram" or against their religion. There is a very stark difference between their practical manifestations of their faith. My Moslem friends have to secretly talk about Sufism, even appreciate its famous poets, etc.

I think that once a critical mass of "free thinking" young Moslems takes hold here, Sufism will explode in popularity, just like the face of Christianity was changed by young people in the past few years. Gay Moslems are already showing to be a pretty large group (especially when they're in the capital, away from their provinces), and the culture is opening up a bit.
 
And what about Xianity's analogous issues? I think the chances for a similar transformation are even more remote. Almost all Xian mysticism has been excluded, even from heterodox sects. Our only hope might be further lurches toward secularization (a la the Deists of the days of yore).

ebola

I don't know, I've been seeing alot of interest in Contemplative Chrstianity lately. They don't put themselves in the spotlight but they have established acceptance and I think the trend is in their favor.

I see alot of positive things brewing just under the surface. It just needs to hit that "critical mass" as Dtergent mentioned.
 
Last edited:
i wish i had the time right now to expound on how bad a fucking idea it sounds like for the west to encourage pacifist muslims to go and undermine radical islam.
 
I am intrigued though. ;)
I'm pretty sure that I disagree vehemently, but I'm intrigued. . . :)
 
I am afraid that a non-Muslim reporter from the BBC is the last person to pose or try to answer ther question. Sufiism is not very popular outside of some isolated areas, outside of Anatolia, southern Pakistan, Herat in Afghanistan (3 Brotherhoods that I know about in Kabul are just subsets of the Herat groups), and so on. Taliban is a modern organic movement and as such a millenia old movement like Sufi is not in a position to compete if that is the right word to even use.

Could Sufi thinking counteract radicalism per se? It has not done so even one iota in Pakistan , if anything it has stifled debate because Sufi preaches concentration on the internal, not the external, and the spirutal over the materiel.

As Dtergent correctly noted, in countries like the Philippines a Sufi would be killed quicker than a Westerner, because it is aseen as Haram (forbidden) and a posion from within, much the way most Sunni view Shi'a.
 
I don't imagine Sufism would be a counter to militant Islam - I view militant Islam as a political/religious point of view. I believe Sufism to be a spiritual matter and therefore it doesn't really operate in the same way or arena. Maybe in the long term but I doubt it.
I don't really know much about Sufism but I like what I've read & seen on TV
 
Top