An end to drug prohibition/Institutionalized dexrimination in our time

[jspun]

Once upon a time the USA tried out the :great noble experimrnt of alcohol prohibition. Legislatures were pusjed by women temperance groups and missionary societies. During this time period, various scandivanian countries had their experiments with alcohol prohibition (Denmark and Finland being notable exeptions). At any rate, before the Volsted act, in 1914, the Harrison Narcotics act illegalized deratives of opium and coccaine. Sympathetic MDs obtained iatrogenic addicts and were rounded up and made examples of in the 20s for acting in contrevention of this act. The prohibition on alcohol ended in the 30s but Narcotics enforcement endured allowing treasy=ury agents to keep their job. But work was slow-a media mogul met with the head of the bureau of narcotics and proposed a ban, atleast a tax on cannabis. He was a rascist, jingonist that got us in the in the spanish-American war and was rascist againat mexicans smojing mota in the west- hence the Marijuana tax act,(fucking William Hertz) the treasure departtement got a bigger bugget, more revenunure agebts, and everyone was happy, bureacraticaly speaking, Propoganda followed,
We have lived under close to 100 years of drug madness.

So this is our mission as I see it, repeal all drug prohibition. Tell our friends cautionsly 100 years of brainwashing is a not easily surmountable task. the best stratagy in my humble opinion is not to rate one drug as worse that another eg heroin vs MDMA or Cannabis but to askep thaT drugs have different levels of harm, some wore, some lesser. If one can accept the ptinciple of self determenation we are on our way-and a shit load of money will be saved. By the way, do we really want to live in a Nanny State?

This movement started world wide and it will have to ended internationaly- Hemnce the longroad ahead of us. It might not be our children, or children's Children, but some day we will hold hand and say "free at last, free at last. God Almighty Free at Last "

There is big monnney involving drug prohibition. This is why the strugle will be long and everyone, in there own way can do there part (plus the illustriuous but up tight WWII genereation is dieing off) Best effort, stay out of trouble, share a subbtle pro- antiprohbibition and above all be subtle, let events unfold.

Anyway, didn;t know were else to post this- the key , and this is importanta, is for us to come together globally.

 

[comatoserct]

i can't take this seriously because all the typos
and I seriously doubt that any drug aside from weed will be completely legalized

 

[jspun]

i can't take this seriously because all the typos
and I seriously doubt that any drug aside from weed will be completely legalized

If I go back and edit it will you take it seriously- you believe that the ideas lack merit because I was having trouble typing in the dark and was too tired to proofread (and yes I didn't download the proofreading tool.) Oh yea, your from the south. Well I guess it would be just as fallacious to judge ones ideas on the basis of typos as it would on their place of birth. I agree with your pragnosis regarding drug prohibition (that would block ending federal law to even declassifying cannabis from a schedule I drug are in areas rife with narrowmindness, like the south (Willie Nelson Not withstanding), Certain NE States, The Mid West, prety much everywhere in the USA except California, Oregon, Washington State, DC, Hawaii, maybe Alaska (were it was defacto legal for 15 years.) In Louisiana, after passage of the Harrison Narcotics act in 1914, there were treatment centers that maintained addicts in Shreveport, LA and other places in the south. These were, again, iatrogenically addicted individuals, rolled up by a federal government that was intrusive in a part of the country known for championing states rights.

i'm just fucking with you. There are pockets of free thought on such controversial issues as harm reduction and an end of cannabis prohibition. Aside from the great patriot and activist, Willie Nelson, born in Texas, is their many Sons and daughters of the south that would atleast get behind medical cannabis? It seems the only thing, narc wize, the south is known for is the proliferation of pain clinicsmin Florida, analogous to MJ dispensaries out here- the former, like the latter, i actually support.

Legalization can happen in our lifetimes but a huge paradigm shift is needed. Atleast I would like to see the adoption of HR principles and I think most Blue Lighters, despite our different views on harm reduction, prohibition, ect... are more open minded than your average apathetic, brainwashed American. Just fucking with you, with all the typos I might not have taken this post seriously either. good luck comato.

The huge irony is that the most oppressive, narrowminded, part of this great nation shared a disproporionate amount of the great thinkers that engineered such American principles as fundamental, inalienablel rights enumerated in the Decleration of Independence, and a great southern patriot Jeffereson, along with Madision (who i believe was Northerner)- The Bill of Rights. That ability to think outside the box, for unconventional thought has seemed to flee the South. Maybe all the Idealists fought and died in the Civil War.

Anyaway, I'm fucking with you, were part of the same team but we can "either hang together or hang seperartely" as a great northern Patriot once stated. I propose the former.

If we organized and started a grass roots effort world wide, HR, the mandate of BL, we might have a shot at this impossible task. Why, may I ask do you think that an end to prohibition or nation wide harm reduction (Swiss Style Rx Heroin Schemes) are not possible in our lifetime?

Atlanta has Coca-Cola (that uses decocanaized cocaine extract in their formula), was the host of an Olympics, and has CNN. Guess its worldly. But why fuck with pain clinics and cannabis dispensaries when you have moon shiners?

Just fuckin with you, lets be alittle more optimistic and pull together- i agree with you the typos were prety bad and there are probably more on this post, i'm too lazy to proofread.

 

[Renz Envy]

The only exception in my opinion is the availability of all these compounds in their pure form. Not to mention a more accurate depiction of the side-effects and effects. (Like cocaine without levimisole, meth and heroin without [god-knows-what])

One cannot simply justify legalizing all drugs. All are addictive in their own aspects, others are very very addictive. Either way there is a lot of gray in the matter that requires analyzing from all sides. If people become dependent or die on said drug, then there is hell to pay for the manufacturer. Death is not a light matter from any side of the equation.

We, unfortunately, do not live in a world where people do research and blame themselves on their mistakes. There will always be a person who chugs a bottle of aspirin, dies, and now the entire family is out for blood.

I share your same belief. The life of a drug user would be easier if you put a libertarian spin on legislation. Perhaps we should form a colony with these rules on an island in the pacific.