• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Lysergamides Albert Hofmann Discovers LSD

red22

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
1,200
Albert Hofmann Discovers LSD. Benjamin Breen, Apr 2013, Origins, Ohio State University


Roman doctors described a disease called the sacred fire (sacer ignis) which by the Middle Ages came to be known as St. Anthony’s Fire: “an ulcerous Eruption, reddish, or mix’d of pale and red: and painful to the Patient,” as one 1714 text put it. This disease was ergotism: poisoning produced by exposure to the compounds found in a fungus that grows on wheat.

In the early decades of the twentieth century, pharmaceutical firms began investigating ergot, finding that it contained valuable medicinal compounds such as ergotamine, used to treat migraines. A Swiss chemist named Albert [Hofmann] became especially interested in this field, and in November 1938, in the week following Kristallnacht and the run-up to World War II, he first created a derivative of ergot that would later be dubbed lysergic acid diethalyamide: LSD.

It was not until five years later, however, that [Hofmann] returned to his invention. His discovery of the new drug’s profoundly psychoactive effects was one of the more famous accidents in the history of science.

milestones20135LSD.jpg

A 1951 vial of LSD manufactured by Sandoz Laboratories, Albert Hofmann’s employer.

Immersed in the complex process of synthesizing the drug, [Hofmann] accidentally allowed a droplet of LSD to dissolve onto his exposed skin. He thought nothing of it: hardly any psychoactive drugs work in such small doses. Later that day, however, he found himself “affected by a remarkable restlessness, combined with a slight dizziness.” As he recollected in his book LSD: My Problem Child ([1979], 1980) some forty years later, he went home sick, lay on his couch, and

sank into a not unpleasant intoxicated-like condition, characterized by an extremely stimulated imagination. In a dreamlike state, with eyes closed (I found the daylight to be unpleasantly glaring), I perceived an uninterrupted stream of fantastic pictures, extraordinary shapes with intense, kaleidoscopic play of colors. After some two hours this condition faded away.

Three days later, on April 19, 1943, the chemist decided to administer what he assumed was a tiny, threshold dose of the compound to himself in order to further test the effects of the drug. He took 250 micrograms, which is now known to be a high dose, roughly ten times higher than the threshold.

Within an hour [Hofmann] found his perception of the world to be strongly altered. He asked his lab assistant to escort him home—by bicycle. Cycling through the Swiss countryside, [Hofmann] was shocked to observe that “everything in my field of vision wavered and was distorted as if seen in a curved mirror.”

By the time he arrived home, [Hofmann] found the effects of the unknown drug alarming enough that he thought it wise to call a doctor. However, the physician reported no abnormal physical symptoms besides dilated pupils, and [Hofmann] began to enjoy himself, admiring

the unprecedented colors and plays of shapes that persisted behind my closed eyes. Kaleidoscopic, fantastic images surged in on me, alternating, variegated, opening and then closing themselves in circles and spirals, exploding in colored fountains, rearranging and hybridizing themselves in constant flux.

[Hofmann] awoke the next morning “refreshed, with a clear head,” and with “a sensation of well-being and renewed life… Breakfast tasted delicious and gave me extraordinary pleasure… the world was [as] if newly created.” [Hofmann] was astonished: there was “no other known substance that evoked such profound psychic effects in such extremely low doses.” To this day, LSD is recognized as one of the most potent drugs known to medical science, and, as [Hofmann] realized early on, it is virtually unique in its ability to evoke “dramatic changes in human consciousness.”

One of the remarkable aspects of [Hofmann’s] story is how detached it was, both temporally and culturally, from the 1960s context with which LSD is often associated today. This delay between the scientific identification and the popular adoption of a drug is a common story.

Fans of Breaking Bad might be surprised to learn, for instance, that methamphetamine is actually a product of the nineteenth century. It was synthesized by the Japanese scientist Nagai Nagayoshi in 1893, but was not widely used until World War II, and failed to break into popular (and street) culture as a recreational drug of abuse until recent decades.

Similarly, LSD came into the world in the 1930s, but its remarkable effects were not even noticed until the 1940s, and it was not until the post-war era that it began to feature in medical studies and reach popular consciousness as a drug of abuse.

[Hofmann’s] invention left a profound legacy: much of our legal and cultural understanding of illicit drugs in the past five decades has been shaped by the impact of LSD. Like the early atomic scientists who were busy at work on the day that [Hofmann] rode his bicycle in 1942, it took time for the genie to come out of its bottle. But when it finally did, the world changed.
 
Last edited:
Albert Hofmann Discovers LSD. Benjamin Breen, Apr 2013, Origins, Ohio State University


Roman doctors described a disease called the sacred fire (sacer ignis) which by the Middle Ages came to be known as St. Anthony’s Fire: “an ulcerous Eruption, reddish, or mix’d of pale and red: and painful to the Patient,” as one 1714 text put it. This disease was ergotism: poisoning produced by exposure to the compounds found in a fungus that grows on wheat.

In the early decades of the twentieth century, pharmaceutical firms began investigating ergot, finding that it contained valuable medicinal compounds such as ergotamine, used to treat migraines. A Swiss chemist named Albert [Hofmann] became especially interested in this field, and in November 1938, in the week following Kristallnacht and the run-up to World War II, he first created a derivative of ergot that would later be dubbed lysergic acid diethalyamide: LSD.

It was not until five years later, however, that [Hofmann] returned to his invention. His discovery of the new drug’s profoundly psychoactive effects was one of the more famous accidents in the history of science.

milestones20135LSD.jpg

A 1951 vial of LSD manufactured by Sandoz Laboratories, Albert Hofmann’s employer.

Immersed in the complex process of synthesizing the drug, [Hofmann] accidentally allowed a droplet of LSD to dissolve onto his exposed skin. He thought nothing of it: hardly any psychoactive drugs work in such small doses. Later that day, however, he found himself “affected by a remarkable restlessness, combined with a slight dizziness.” As he recollected in his book LSD: My Problem Child ([1979], 1980) some forty years later, he went home sick, lay on his couch, and



Three days later, on April 19, 1943, the chemist decided to administer what he assumed was a tiny, threshold dose of the compound to himself in order to further test the effects of the drug. He took 250 micrograms, which is now known to be a high dose, roughly ten times higher than the threshold.

Within an hour [Hofmann] found his perception of the world to be strongly altered. He asked his lab assistant to escort him home—by bicycle. Cycling through the Swiss countryside, [Hofmann] was shocked to observe that “everything in my field of vision wavered and was distorted as if seen in a curved mirror.”

By the time he arrived home, [Hofmann] found the effects of the unknown drug alarming enough that he thought it wise to call a doctor. However, the physician reported no abnormal physical symptoms besides dilated pupils, and [Hofmann] began to enjoy himself, admiring



[Hofmann] awoke the next morning “refreshed, with a clear head,” and with “a sensation of well-being and renewed life… Breakfast tasted delicious and gave me extraordinary pleasure… the world was [as] if newly created.” [Hofmann] was astonished: there was “no other known substance that evoked such profound psychic effects in such extremely low doses.” To this day, LSD is recognized as one of the most potent drugs known to medical science, and, as [Hofmann] realized early on, it is virtually unique in its ability to evoke “dramatic changes in human consciousness.”

One of the remarkable aspects of [Hofmann]’s story is how detached it was, both temporally and culturally, from the 1960s context with which LSD is often associated today. This delay between the scientific identification and the popular adoption of a drug is a common story.

Fans of Breaking Bad might be surprised to learn, for instance, that methamphetamine is actually a product of the nineteenth century. It was synthesized by the Japanese scientist Nagai Nagayoshi in 1893, but was not widely used until World War II, and failed to break into popular (and street) culture as a recreational drug of abuse until recent decades.

Similarly, LSD came into the world in the 1930s, but its remarkable effects were not even noticed until the 1940s, and it was not until the post-war era that it began to feature in medical studies and reach popular consciousness as a drug of abuse.

[Hofmann]’s invention left a profound legacy: much of our legal and cultural understanding of illicit drugs in the past five decades has been shaped by the impact of LSD. Like the early atomic scientists who were busy at work on the day that [Hofmann] rode his bicycle in 1942, it took time for the genie to come out of its bottle. But when it finally did, the world changed.
One of the most breath-taking and impactful experience of my life was an LSD trip gone terribly right. Made me quit smoking and consuming nicotine actually. I vividly recall the film over the world; a pattern had formed. A pink lens with green and white diamonds. Some type of lettering perhaps. I don't know. Beautiful. Such fascinations. Words escape me, but I managed to handle that one.

LSD is one of the few hallucinogens I have ever really struggled with and I have taken plenty. I don't know why, but even DMT is laughable compared to some of the LSD experiences I have had. Thanks for sharing.
 
One of the most breath-taking and impactful experience of my life was an LSD trip gone terribly right. Made me quit smoking and consuming nicotine actually. I vividly recall the film over the world; a pattern had formed. A pink lens with green and white diamonds. Some type of lettering perhaps. I don't know. Beautiful. Such fascinations. Words escape me, but I managed to handle that one.

LSD is one of the few hallucinogens I have ever really struggled with and I have taken plenty. I don't know why, but even DMT is laughable compared to some of the LSD experiences I have had. Thanks for sharing.
I'd definitely agree. Out of the many trips I've had (Mescaline, Magic Mushrooms, LSD and DMT) LSD has definitely been the most impactful for me (followed by a few profound mushroom trips ;)).
but was not widely used until World War II
Nice mention of the use of Pervitin. Pretty interesting that the Nazis used it to very quickly invade a lot of Europe (also kinda f*cked at the same time 😢)
 
I'd definitely agree. Out of the many trips I've had (Mescaline, Magic Mushrooms, LSD and DMT) LSD has definitely been the most impactful for me (followed by a few profound mushroom trips ;)).

The topic of comparing psychedelics is a fascinating one, as they're so similar in that they have unique effects that other substances don't have, but some of them are quite different from each other.

This is an interesting statement (although it contains inaccuracies and a bias):

Shulgin is not a big fan of tryptamines. I own PiHhKAL and TiHKAL. PiHKAL is well written and makes all his favorite phenethylamines look fabulous despite the fact that most people don't like them much. Most people prefer tryptamines over phenethylamines, however his book TiHKAL makes you think tryptamines are pretty horrible compounds.

If you read his section on LSD in TiHKAL and compare that to his section on mescaline in PiHhKAL, you’ll see what I mean. He makes mescaline seem like the best thing in the world and pretty much glosses over LSD in TiHKAL. In the section on LSD there isn’t a single trip report. You would think maybe a word from Dr. Leary, Mr. Hofmann, etc., but there’s nothing interesting to read of it. It’s a big disappointment.

He’s obviously slanted in favor of phenethylamines and seems to dislike nearly all the tryptamines from what I’ve read in his book.

I was vastly disappointed when I bought TiHKAL. I thought PiHhKAL was an excellent book. I found most of the information in TiHKAL to be very inaccurate. I found the trip reports to be a collection of some of the worst possible trip reports you can find. He tried hard to find all those bad trip reports he used in that book. I don’t know what his motive is.

I think maybe he feels a little jealous that most of his phenethylamine creations have not been big hits on the drug scene. Albert Hofmann’s LSD overshadowed everything he ever created. Whenever people run across his creations on blotter paper they are usually pretty upset. A few people like them, but the majority prefer LSD and the other tryptamines over his creations.

On a side note, Shulgin did NOT invent MDMA, but a lot of people think he did. Most of the psychedelic drugs that have killed people were invented by Shulgin: DOB, DOM, 2C-T-7, etc. To this day LSD has killed no one. Every year you hear about deaths caused by one of the drugs invented by Shulgin. In general the tryptamines are far safer than the phenethylamines.

I think Shulgin feels that in his life he’s played second fiddle to Hofmann. Many look to Hofmann with almost God-like admiration from bringing LSD into the world. LSD had a huge impact on the entire world. Hofmann single handedly shifted the consciousness of millions of people by inventing LSD. And he did so by accident! Talk about dumb luck!

While Hofmann created LSD by accident, Shulgin has spent much his life specifically trying to make something as special as LSD, but has yet to succeed at it. Shulgin used mescaline as the bases for most of his creations. Had Shulgin focused his effort on the less toxic tryptamines instead, then maybe we’d have something better than LSD, psilocybin and DMT. If you do a poll you’ll find that the majority of psychedelic users like LSD, psilocybin and DMT more than any of Shulgin’s psychedelic creations.


69Ron, 9/17/2008, DMT-Nexus

Someone replied to it with this:

I definitely agree with shulgins assertment that mescaline is better than LSD too and find it hard to believe most people would not feel the same, the biggest reason mescaline isn't popular is because even if you synthesize it it's relatively expensive so no one ever comes across it. I mean to a chemist the mescaline may not cost much, but for the same amount of work and chems you could make ~30x as many doses of 2cb which is also arguably a more versatile chem due to its shorter duration. With LSD you would get ~2000x as many doses.

krypto2000, 04/02/17, The Shroomery

So, yeah, it's very interesting how people have different, strong opinions about this topic. While you and @ShulginsReincarnation are saying LSD is the best, the first person quoted greatly prefers the tryptamines and the second one prefers mescaline.

All I can say is I like the psychological effect of LSD better than the spooky effect of tryptamines, but I like the way tryptamines feel better (but I'm still holding out for "absolutely pure double-recrystallized chromatographed LSD").

The best way for me to end this post is to post this image that represents the bases of each of the psychedelic types:


Credit: Designer Drug Exposé: Lysergamides. Tripsitter. Tripsitter and Justin Cooke, Dec 16, 2023

It should be noted that the phenethylamine is turned upside to show its similarity. The simplistic look of phenethylamine seems to be reflective of their effects: light-hearted and less "deep" or "spiritual". Someone in the thread for the second quote describes them as "the more social like drugs and intoxications.":

"In some of the videos the Shulgins paint a DMT consciousness with a more negative light in favor of the phenethylamines, the more social like drugs and intoxications. They don't like it when you can lose communication." (Blabble40, 03/26/17, The Shroomery)

He goes on to refer to DMT as an "ultimate" psychedelic, which reminded me of this quote from another discussion:

The duration and overall dynamic is different. LSD has a peak and then slowly subsides. Aya comes and goes, it has many peaks. The ceremony is designed for those peaks. Also, the effects are completly different: in my time I dropped absurd, more than heroic, almost godlike quantities of LSD, and never left this world. With a small quantity of Aya you can leave this universe and return as a changed, more balanced human being. There is a metaphysical component to Ayahusca that LSD just can’t provide, unless you’re willing to pray to a bicicle god and a swiss chemist.

Not to mention the complete lack of respect taking LSD in an Aya ceremony would imply…


RencillosaMulaArabe, May 22, 2024, reddit

 
Last edited:
So, yeah, it's very interesting how people have different, strong opinions about this topic. While you and @ShulginsReincarnation are saying LSD is the best, the first person quoted greatly prefers the tryptamines and the second one prefers mescaline.
Very well thought out response. However, I do not want to mislead people regarding my opinion on the matter. While LSD was in fact something special in its own right, the phenethylamines are probably my favorite class (specifically the 2c-x series) in terms of range of effects, but I favor DMT and its analongs in terms of teacher/healer type substances (4-ho-dmt being the best teacher/healer.) As you said, there must be some reason everyone has their preference and I do have my theories on this that being said.

But, yes, I just wanted to briefly chime in on that once more to clarify. Thanks for your insight!!
 
Welcome back to The Drop In, DoubleBlind’s psychedelic newsletter serving up news, culture, and events from the underground straight to your inbox.

Per usual, today’s dispatch is packed with wild stories. One of which is about Willy Myco, the multi-hyphenate mycologist, chemist, and content creator, who traveled to Pakistan to record a step-by-step instructional video on how to make LSD. It’s the first REAL, detailed recording of someone making the compound — not a cheesy voiceover tutorial on LSD synthesis paired with flashy visuals of molecules. This story truly has it all: calls from the FBI, scientists in Pakistan, death threats, and more. From the bottom of my bleeding heart, you DON’T want to miss drugs journalist Patrick Maravelias’ dazzling DB debut. You can find it below! ⚛️ 🧪

If you keep scrolling, you’ll find an opus on the evolution of modern psychedelic art (another story that truly has it all) by prolific writer and journalist Julia Edelman, and stories on glow-in-the-dark mushrooms, why people have bad trips, and so much more.

Sending sunshine,

Mary Carreón
Senior Editor
Dec 19, 2024


Willy Myco Just Released the First-Ever Video Demonstrating How to Synthesize LSD. Patrick Maravelias, Dec 18, 2024, DoubleBlind

After all that, the lead chemist at the University of Okara, Dr. Ali Altaf, performed the synthesis on video, and Willy released it to his Patreon on Halloween night with step-by-step instructions on how to make LSD in very simple terms. As someone with no knowledge of organic chemistry whatsoever, I was able to follow along with the video very easily.

“Literally a grandma could take my video, watch it, and produce LSD,” says Willy.


This quote corroborates Owsley's statement:

You were one of the major acid chemists of the Sixties, but apart from supplying the LSD, in what other way did you help stage The Acid Tests?

I am not, and never was, a "chemist". I am no more scientifically qualified in chemistry than someone who can bake a great wedding cake is. I was soundman for a band, Grateful Dead, who were the house band at the Acid Tests.

I called you a chemist because that is what you are referred to in most literature. Also, I assumed anyone making acid had to be a chemist, considering the fact that every time manufacturing is mentioned they always go on about how hard it is to produce it.

Difficulty has more to do with reading ability and ability to precisely follow directions, so far as I can see. You need no knowledge of chemistry whatsoever, you just need to understand some basic principles as simple in concept as: water boils at 100C and freezes at 0C. Otherwise all published syntheses of organic and inorganic compounds can be reproduced successfully by pretty nearly anyone with at least average intelligence. I had only one semester of inorganic chem 11 years earlier. It took me just three weeks in a library to learn all the principles I needed to do what I had to do, including how to change standard glassware to make it work better. Simple really. Problems always have to do with availability of materials, not esoteric knowledge.

“Wolfe is Useless”: Owsley Stanley on the Merry Pranksters and the Acid Tests. Henrik Dahl, The Oak Tree Review, Jan 2003


Related:

The Sunshine Makers (documentary). 2015. Cosmo Feilding-Mellen, Connie Littlefield, Passion Pictures, Persephone Productions, FilmRise

The fascinating untold story of Nicholas Sand and Tim Scully, the unlikely duo at the heart of 1960s American drug counterculture. United in a utopian mission to save the planet through the consciousness- raising power of LSD, these underground chemists manufactured a massive amount of acid, all while staying one step ahead of the feds.


Tracking the Supply of LSD. Trafficked, S3E2, National Geographic, Jan 25, 2023


Der Hype um legales LSD in Deutschland: Wie das Verbot umgangen wird. VICE auf Deutsch, Aug 7, 2022, YouTube (3:32) (Interview with the man who invented LSD prodrugs)

 
Last edited:
Top