Afghans to consider legalising opium production

Skyline_GTR

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Aug 28, 2002
Messages
4,326
Location
UK
Financial Times
25th July 2005

Link

Afghans to consider legalising opium production
By Andrew Jack in London


Afghan farmers could from next year be able to grow opium for legal medicinal purposes, under an innovative plan designed to curb illegal production being drawn up by a drug policy think-tank.

The Senlis Council, a group that studies narcotics, is in preliminary talks with international organisations and Afghan regional administrations to garner their support for pilot programmes designed to tackle the country's problem with opium by using it to produce the legal painkillers codeine and morphine.

The council, due to present in September a feasibility study funded by a dozen European social policy foundations, calculates that Afghan farmers and intermediaries could receive revenues from the scheme that almost match their current earnings from unauthorised opium production for smuggling abroad.

The plan could help bring greater stability to Afghanistan and reduce illegal flows of opium to the rest of the world.

It could also help fill developing nations' large demand for painkillers. The group calculates this demand could be for twice the amount of Afghanistan's annual opium harvest.

"This may be the only chance Afghanistan has to solve its drug problem," said Emmanuel Reinert, co-ordinator of the study for the Senlis Council, who emphasised that discussions were at an early stage.

He hoped agreement for pilot projects could be reached later this year. "We think there are some good possibilities for shifting the debate," Mr Reinert said.

He said the plan had met cautious interest from officials including Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, although some members of the Afghan cabinet and foreign governments had expressed concern it could undermine current efforts to eradicate domestic opium production.

However, he argued neither eradication nor alternative employment programmes provided a realistic short-term alternative for Afghan farmers of opium, which accounts for an estimated 60 per cent of the country's gross domestic product and 80 per cent of the world's illegally consumed heroin.

The Senlis plan is modelled on programmes in India and Turkey, which have helped reduce illegal opium production through a strictly supervised licensing scheme backed by the US Congress.

Congress requires 80 per cent of painkillers for the US market to use materials originating from these two countries.

Mr Reinert said Turkey may be supportive because Afghan drug smuggling threatens its security, while India may resist new suppliers of painkillers.
 
The problem I see with this is that if there was quite a large take up of this scheme by farmers in Afghanistan, it would reduce the black market supply of opium and therefore push up heroin prices. And that means addicts having to commit more crime to fund their addiction.
 
could receive revenues from the scheme that almost match their current earnings from unauthorised opium production for smuggling abroad.


Riiiiiiiight.

If I were a poppie grower, I would sell to whomever paid me more. I don't see heroin producers running out of cash any time soon. Nor do I see addicts quitting because H is more expensive. We all know that making a black market drug more expensive helps to curb abuse, and crime... right?? Fucking idiots.
8)
 
I don't think this will cause crime to go up. More so, heroin labs would buy their opium from a different supplier.

Instead of "Heroin! Made fresh from Poppies from Afghanistan" you will have "Heroin! Made fresh from Poppies from France" or some other country.
 
Maybe not in the States as most of the heroin there comes from Mexico and Columbia, but it would probably effect other places.. IIRC about 85% of the world's heroin (or opium used for heroin production) comes from Afghanistan. Some comes from countries in South East Asia like Burma and Laos.. but surely they couldn't bump up production by such a huge amount anytime soon, to cover any short fall?

Also as jdude points out, it probably wouldn't come to that anyway - the heroin producers could afford to pay the Afghan farmers more, whilst the pharmaceutical industry couldn't afford to because they have lots of competition and relatively low margins.

But which ever way it went it's not the best policy anyway. If they did drastically reduce the amount of opium coming on to the black market from Afghanistan, and it didn't effect prices because the short fall was made up from new operations elsewhere, then they're back to square one..
 
So we should just have Afghanistan keep producing illicit opium? This is stupid....

The best thing would be for everyone to legalize opiates but since that isn't going to happen.... I think this is a great way for afghan farmers to continue what they know how to do while making money legitamately.

SOMEONE will pick up where Afghanistan would leave off. Laos and Burma would quickly rush to fill up the void. Obviously, if this happens, heroin producers are going to be looking for sources and if they don't decide to do it themselves someone will come up with the right offer.
 
why can't the world just legitamize the drug trade? it could bring in money for the smaller countries that the big countries are messing with/exploiting, just another export like coffee. then, you can have some sort of labor laws, so the people working the farms have rights and don't have to fear getting killed or something. just like any other business.
 
Top