moracca
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2005
- Messages
- 261
Hi. I'm not sure if this is the right place for this post, as it might not be "advanced enough," but I have a question that has never made much sense to me, and when I UTFSE I really only find posts that kind of take it as common knowledge and gloss over it. my question is this:
most psychedelic drugs rely mostly on agonism at the 5ht2a receptors, correct? Well it is my understanding that the receptors at the synapses can either fire or not, ie, either the receptor recieves its stimulus and sends the message or it doesn't, no inbetween. So then, how is there so much of a difference when a drug like LSD binds to the receptor than when serotonin binds to the receptor. I don't know how to word this right but hopefully you get what I'm asking. If its either on or off, how can one agonist have a different effect than another?
Thanks for your help, and sorry if this is a rudimentary question, but its just something that's bugged me.
most psychedelic drugs rely mostly on agonism at the 5ht2a receptors, correct? Well it is my understanding that the receptors at the synapses can either fire or not, ie, either the receptor recieves its stimulus and sends the message or it doesn't, no inbetween. So then, how is there so much of a difference when a drug like LSD binds to the receptor than when serotonin binds to the receptor. I don't know how to word this right but hopefully you get what I'm asking. If its either on or off, how can one agonist have a different effect than another?
Thanks for your help, and sorry if this is a rudimentary question, but its just something that's bugged me.
