zn13bt said:
I'm really interested in this idea of being tripped out of existence, and DPT being particularly effective at triggering such a state. I mentioned in a PM to CBD that it sounded similar to the "cessations" I've had while doing vipassana meditation, which I've experienced as a momentary discontinuity in the stream of consciousness (it's not quite the same as amnesia, because it feels like all mental processes come to a halt all at once and then start back up again). Though rereading this thread now, it sounds like the two of you did have some awareness of the passage of time, so maybe it's not quite the same thing. Another possibility is one of the formless jhanas where the sense of self is pretty much gone but there's still some minimal sensory processing going on. Anyways, I haven't done DPT in years, but this is inspiring me to break out my stash again and try a few experiments of my own.
Yes, most definitely!!! This is really along the lines of what I was thinking. Im glad you brought it up...it could certainly possibly be a formless jhana state...perhaps the third or fourth arupa-jhana. I was reading Julius Evola and surprisingly came across a passage which discusses the connection you made, and it does sound pretty similar to what we were experiencing.
"We have conceived the nidāna "consciousness" in terms of a determined manifestation. To cut off the bond that it represents, we must pass over to the third āyatana or arupa-jhāna, whose object is experience of the sphere of "nonexistence." This sphere must be understood as the negative counterpart of "consciousness," that is, the power of nonmanifestation correlative to that of manifestation, whose principle is "consciousness." The experience of the āyatana can also be denoted by the formula "nothing exists," since to penetrate the power of nonmanifestation means to apprehend in everything the possibility of its nonexistence, the lack of its own reality, even in the case of him "in virtue of who everything that exists is." For this reason, some have conceived the experience in question as a liberation from Etwas-heit, from objectivity in general, extended even to the supercelestial spheres." - The Doctrine of Awakening: The Attainment of Self-Mastery According to the Earliest Buddhist Texts
The awareness of the passage of time is really interesting. It only occurred after regaining consciousness. I assume it was a biological issue...I know there are several studies confirming the slowing down of time during a NDE (David Eagleman's SCAD experiment). There's a psychology journal piece ("Time Slows Down during Accidents") detailing the phenomenon and it outlined some of it's characteristics
"To summarize, the key features of the experiences that are of interest here are the following:
1. The feeling of external time expanding and slowing down to a great extent.
2. Dominant mental quickness as demonstrated by the increased speed of thoughts.
3. There is often an altered sense of the duration of the event lasting longer than it actually does.
4. If possible, in the event in question, people often act fast and purposefully.
5. In the latter case, their attention is also altered and narrowly focused on the issues relevant for survival.
6. Unusually sharp vision or hearing."
I thought this was quite fascinating in that even the sensation of "unusually sharp vision or hearing" was experienced as CBD mentioned when she wrote, "The visuals were so crisp and sharp that entire room seemed to be splitting into fragments." I figured that since this was the last conscious perception we had, that upon re-awakening the experience of slowed-down time gave us the sense that eons had indeed passed during the occurrence.
If you decide to break out the stash I'd really be interested in hearing about any experiences you have! What you wrote really made me think quite a bit and get a better grasp on the situation. It's fascinating stuff...many thanks! :D
Gratuitous Grace said:
Now, I don't want to cross any personal lines, but could I just suggest that you don't try to conceptualize the whole thing into obliteration?
Neither, if we are to remain sane, can we possibly do without direct perception, the more unsystematic the better, of the inner and outer worlds into which we have been born. This given reality is an infinite which passes all understanding and yet admits of being directly and in some sort totally apprehended. It is a transcendence belonging to another order than the human, and yet it may be present to us as a felt immanence, an experienced participation.
Yeah, I do realize that many of the responses in this thread are pretty detailed...but I don't personally feel that several posts on a forum really constitutes as "conceptualizing into obliteration". Particularly since you quoted an essay from Huxley which is much lengthier and more discursive than anything written here so far (covering topics as vast as the Platonic sense of Is-ness, zen koans, the relation between modern psychiatry and Tibetan Buddhism, Sat Chit Ananda, etc etc etc). And I really dont mean that in a pejoritive sense...I love Huxley very much...but I think his position might be more complex than what you stated (I think you might only be displaying one side of his position).
There's a direct response to this in Huxley's book Island where Will states, "Whereas, if I choose to project instead of taking in, I can conceptualize it into pure nonsense." And Mrs. Narayan retorts, "The analyzing tradition-bound concept maker and the alertly passive insight receiver— neither is infallible; but both together can do a reasonably good job." Also, the sentence right before your quote from Doors of Perception is "Systematic reasoning is something we could not, as a species or as individuals, possibly do without." I certainly don't think that Huxley was against in-depth philosophizing (he certainly did quite a bit of it himself)...I just think he simply saw it as one side of the coin (the other side dealing with the felt presence of direct experience). Both are necessary it seems, according to Huxley.
Gratuitous Grace said:
So many people love to throw the term "ego death" into their trip reports (it's almost a requirement) -- and then follow that up with sentiments like "and then I saw so clearly that we're all one" ... or some such thing. Huh? Who's this "I" that's suddenly back on the scene?
But yeah, this is essentially what I was trying to get at with with a lot of the musings here on ego-loss. Im really glad someone understands!

And it's a big reason why I found this experience to be so fascinating for me. So many people use ego-loss in a monistic Hindu type sense. There's a famous saying in Hindu theology..."Atman is Brahman". Atman being the self, Brahman being without form...so I think that it seems that in almost every case, when people refer to "I" in the context of ego loss they are discussing something similar to Para Brahman...eliminating the individual self and becoming aware of the "Great Self" (the "we're all one" phenomenon that you mentioned). But thats much different than the complete and direct experience of "nothingness", which is more of what this experience entailed. Its a type of trip that I don't see discussed often in professional psychedelic literature or trip reports...so it was really really interesting to me. And it's awesome to see that other people like yourself really understood the original trip report in a more accurate context! I definitely agree with ya on much of your post
