He takes the boys too because that way he can have them propagate the genetic code. It's the same thinking that royals during the middle ages would use. The daughter spreads the seed but the sons keep the bloodline within the family control
US Politics the 2025 trump presidency thread
- Thread starter alasdairm
- Start date
Its interesting how much of a disadvantage restricting a gene pool puts an organism at, within the royal families and other restricted gene pools a high degree of recessive mutations get expressed
Eugenicists are obsessed with purity thinking that they are ensuring "better" humans but in reality they're actually causing a greater degree of physiological issues and limiting genetic variability which is the underpinning of evolution. It literally holds humanity back
Eugenicists are obsessed with purity thinking that they are ensuring "better" humans but in reality they're actually causing a greater degree of physiological issues and limiting genetic variability which is the underpinning of evolution. It literally holds humanity back
It's true, though diversity is much more difficult to control and thus feels too chaotic for control-minded people (which monarchs and Elon definitely are). They're not doing it for the survival of the species, they're doing it for familial dominance at the expense of robust genetics.
Distilled whiteness is an awful thing to be around - no fucking culture... bad hangs.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
All of them are IVF, except for maybe his first child with Grimes - the one with the weird name. That’s way worse than artificial insemination. But yeah, he’s definitely a huge personal pronatalist. I have never played fallout, no.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
I don’t see how that’s different from 99.999% of politicians.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
Not at all. Eugenics requires limitations. He wasn’t even able to do any type of embryo selection until quite recently. At most you could say he does selective breeding - like everyone. Also, IVF is dysgenic. I WISH he were eugenicist.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
I do find it kinda disturbing that he only has two girls out of 12 children. And THAT was definitely by selection imo. But you could argue that it’s more valuable for men to be high IQ and males are also more likely to be very high IQ to begin with so given his particular genetics and makes more sense for him to have a lot of sons
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
Inbreeding is NOT eugenics. At least not unless they prevent those with genetic defects due to inbreeding from further procreating. Selective breeding is arguably really the only long-term form of eugenics that has ever been in action and it is why humans have advanced as much as they have.
Last edited:
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
Disgustingly antiwhite of you. I love my people and my culture.
jasperkent
Bluelighter
Incorrect
All politicians have big egos, bur they usually stand for something bigger than themselves.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
I have never seen any proof of that in any major politician.
jasperkent
Bluelighter
Every US President in my lifetime (starting with Eisenhower) was in it for reasons beyond money, power, and attention. They might have framed it as democracy, freedom, nationalism, patriotism, populism, capitalism, liberalism, security, or a dozen other ways, but it wasn't all about them personally.
Until Trump.
Some of those Presidents I liked, others I didn't. Some were good at their jobs, others weren't. But they all believed they were doing what was best for America. Trump doesn't give a shit about America. Trump cares about Trump. That is all.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
Prove it.
jasperkent
Bluelighter
Study American History.
fairnymph
Ex-Bluelighter
A non-answer. How about you prove that Trump doesn’t stand for anything, & prove that one politician of your choice does? I think Trump’s just more honest than other politicians. That doesn’t mean I think he’s a good guy. I don’t trust any politicians or either big party. But I don’t understand this ‘Democrat presidents are great but the Republican ones are evil’ - just like I don’t understand it when Republicans say the same thing flipped. They both seem utterly delusional takes to me. Not trying to strawman you as you have not explicitly said any such thing, but you kind of have implied it.
jasperkent
Bluelighter
I never said all Republicans are bad or all Democrats are good. I do not believe that. I'm saying Trump is a unique case.
But at this point, arguing about Trump is like debating the existence of God. For the vast majority of us, our minds are made up and nothing the other side says will make any difference.
So I'm out. Good day.
LucidSDreamr
Bluelighter
There is a ketamine addict and group of twenty year old kids gutting the CIA, FBI and military.
So you're saying that the solution to the issue caused by restricting the gene pool is *restricting it even more*?
In humans selective breeding is done on an individual pairing basis not population
Any culture that's distilled to a level of high purity is something I find... boring.
I like the synergy of multiculturalism - the music, the art, the food, the fusion of ideas, and the strongest characteristics of many things coming together ina beautiful tapestry.
I'm also a being of dynamics and chaos, not order and rules, so that probably plays a part in why I gravitate in that direction. To me, cultural distillation is the path to soullessness.
IQ tests were developed by men so it's obviously a distinct possibility that there's unintentional biases in the measurement tool. We already know there are biases to IQ measures that are measurable. Not just by men either, by white men of a certain class, race, and ethnic background. How can they possibly know how to accurately measure intelligence of a say... tribal elder from the bush in africa?
There are many types of intelligence, IQ, EQ, SQ, PhysQ, MuiQ... there's a whole book on the study of intelligence phenomenology.