mal3volent
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2011
- Messages
- 40,118
I didn't say it made a conclusion about the bombing, only a conclusion that the evidence presented by Israel was false
I didn't say you said that. I added it on for emphasis.
you said that Israel "manufactured evidence". There is no proof of that.
The video in question is one piece of many.
The ironic thing here, which I see is going way above everyone's heads, is that the Times analysis actually makes quite a strong case that Israel can't be responsible for this particular incident. IF their tools can conclusively show the malfunctioning Hamas rocket exploded in the air and they've triangulated it from multiple angles, surely that same technology would have picked up on the Israeli missile that actually did strike the hospital parking lot? (Assuming giant precision guided Israeli missiles miss their targets and leave tiny craters, of course).
They released a phone call where Hamas basically admits it was one of theirs. But that's just staged right?
I'm sure all the tankie Marxists on social media will go munchmunchmunch on this. And show just as little comprehension as you have.