Pointing out no one’s above it. Pro establishment people have much more hubris about this type of thing. We are all in our respective camps. The simple fact is that no criticism of a major pharmaceutical product that collaborates with the state, is going to be allowed in major publications. Unless it’s been specifically green lit, like with oxy or something.
You have repeatedly failed to explain what you mean by the term 'establishment', or at least the examples you gave were subject to fairly robust rebuttals from multiple BL members.
If you believe ANY media outlet is providing content for your benefit, you are much mistaken. If it's clearly run for profit i.e. it's funded by advertising then content is ONLY provided to keep people going to the page and at least SOME of them are influenced by the ads.
Now for-profit is generally the least malicious because if their content is repeatedly shown to be inaccurate, biased, or entirely fictitious then few advertisers would wish to be associated with them and the number of readers would be limited. In fact, limited to those whose prejudices align with said inaccuracies and biases and will accept entirely any fictitious item if it feeds into their prejudices.
It's more news sites whose income streams are NOT for-profit that appear to specialize in feeding to prejudices and who regularly publish inaccurate, biased and fictitious news items. Because clearly it's not FREE to provide content. Yes, the costs can be kept low and most of this category of site really could be generated by a few people in their spare time. But always ask 'who gains' and your latest source is evidently designed to provide a religious body with a propaganda outlet. So it's published (in this case) so said religious body 'gains'.
But the darkest of all are the handful of evidently highly-funded sites that have no evident income streams and yet would take hundreds of man-hours a day to keep updated. Of those I have seen, SOMEONE is clearly investing a lot of money and whatever their 'gain', it isn't financial.
If anything appears to be free, YOU ARE the product.
And I'm afraid to say you really have shown just how much such outlets 'gain' from what I think is better termed 'disinformation' or to use the less politically correct term - propaganda. Then you take this media and spread it as much as possible. I hate to say it but you are displaying exactly what Marx, Stalin and Tito all stated as their goal of propaganda - 'useful idiots' or, possibly a better translation, 'useful innocents'.
I am not saying you are an idiot, I'm merely saying that you are displaying precisely the behaviors of someone Marx, Stalin and Tito all referred to as 'useful idiots'. You are part of their propaganda machine without being conscious of the fact.
www.lifesitenews.com
expose-news.com
