• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Gun Pulled & Man Maced As Neo-Nazi Protestors Surround Family Drag Storytime Event

you're actually being pretty anti-semitic by making these comparisons. Please stop.
Also anti-LGB, hatred of Slavic people, Romani/Gypsy, black people, other ethnicities, etc. I understand the reaction but it is not the same.



 
Last edited:
it's fucking not anti- semetic, holy fuck.

saying that people are calling for genocide (and then proving it) and then saying that i don't want it to turn into the most famous modern genocide is IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM racist against one of the groups that was a part of said modern genocide.

just stop.

(unless you have a well formulated paragraph or two to support your wild claim, that is)

@mal3volent
 
it is not the same.
wow, did NObody read ANYthing i said?

NEVER did i say it was the same. stop making shit up about me.

-----------------------------

this reminds me of when i said:

"calling jan. 6 a tour around the capitol is like saying 9/11 was a sketchy landing"

and then 1/6 terrorism apologists lied and said i called jan. 6 the same as 9/11.

could have even been the same ppl, i don't remember.
 
Last edited:
passionate about pro- genocidal assholes and people that misrepresent what i say, yerp
 
yeah, let's not complain or try to stop others from LITERALLY trying genocide against certain groups cause those groups have flushing toilets and access to sushi.

good talk.
 



Genocide in 2023:

stBWlII.jpg


Genocide in 1943:

uFLziNY.jpg


j5iptZs.jpg


14FtxOL.jpg


4smXswa.jpg
 
cherry picking one of the more innocuous (and yet still idiotic) things she's said and putting it up against pictures of the haulocaust means nothing in this conversation.

and you know, your apologetics only helps the people THAT ACTUALLY ARE calling for genocide... people that i have demonstrated IN THIS THREAD to have actually said these things. great job adding ZERO substance and yet still helping pro- genocide a- holes.

shameful.
 
i mean, they are downplaying comments from people THAT ACTUALLY SAID the things, so... it's fucking true.
 
i just wonder on a scholarly level how many people usually try and deny/ downplay pro- genocidal comments before an actual genocide happens.

i hope you guys are right that it's nothing to worry about, but there are (as i've stated) already public figures calling for it, and there are states that are putting their toes in the cultural- genocide water under the guise of "protecting children".

i guess your fingers will be planted im your ears until the very first trans person is executed in the modern west for being trans? well i don't want it to get ANYWHERE near that point. and i guarantee you people will try.
 
i just wonder on a scholarly level how many people usually try and deny/ downplay pro- genocidal comments before an actual genocide happens.

i hope you guys are right that it's nothing to worry about, but there are (as i've stated) already public figures calling for it, and there are states that are putting their toes in the cultural- genocide water under the guise of "protecting children".

i guess your fingers will be planted im your ears until the very first trans person is executed in the modern west for being trans? well i don't want it to get ANYWHERE near that point. and i guarantee you people will try.

executed for being trans? LOL. How do we get from White House invitations and Budweiser endorsements to execution?
 
Right. Every fortune 500 company supports them, every public university, all government institutions, and laws were created to protect them from "hate"

One shot up a Christian school and immediately the government and media went all out praising the trans community, but "genocide"
 
you laugh, but i've already posted public figures calling for it.

we already have anti- trans governors for crying out loud.

do you have any substantial input on the matter? or just shallow rhetorical questions and (s)dank memes?
 
you laugh, but i've already posted public figures calling for it.

we already have anti- trans governors for crying out loud.

do you have any substantial input on the matter? or just shallow rhetorical questions and (s)dank memes?
just answer the question
 
why would i answer your loaded, and silly red- herring? you think i can predict the future?

this all started because apologists denied that anyone was even calling for it. then i proved they were, and the goalposts just kept on moving.
 
why would i answer your loaded, and silly red- herring? you think i can predict the future?

this all started because apologists denied that anyone was even calling for it. then i proved they were, and the goalposts just kept on moving.

translation: I don't have an answer
 
why should i have an answer? it makes zero difference, no matter what my answer would be. companies are not state governors (although many politicians are bought out by certain industries, but i digress).

your rhetorical question is not substantive. please, add some substance.
 
I guess your fingers will be planted im your ears until the very first trans person is executed in the modern west for being trans? well i don't want it to get ANYWHERE near that point. and i guarantee you people will try.
I think you're crying wolf here.

IRL Trans people have never had greater acceptance in society. More and more people are identifying as trans, in many areas it is illegal for trans people to be discriminated against, its become taboo to even question the smallest aspects of the trans movement, it is no longer as medicalised, trans people are openly invited into the halls of power. The issue is that this may have gone too far and become highly illiberal in its own way. That you see this as similar to the Holocaust is either ignorance of history or a form of historical revisionism that trivialises the very real experiences of the Jews under Nazi rule.

I don't doubt that there are bigots who hate trans people but assuming they talk for the majority is a really low resolution take on this issue. It is easier to characterise your opponents as monstrous, but that is what idiots like Matt Walsh do. That's a good enough reason to do something different to them. Using argument that appeal to reason rather than emotion seems like the best way we have for avoiding violence.
 
Top