I'm mildly concerned about bringing up children in such a "pro-trans" society, but he existence of trans people trumps anything in media. They exist. Kids are going to encounter them. We don't pretend gay people don't exist.
I'd prefer to raise my kids in a less confusing time because I'm not convinced that the alarming acceleration of the trans movement is good for society long-term, but there's nothing that can be done.
I'm quite concerned, in fact.
I think the naïvety in this society is quite problematic but your comment shows more truth about the problem, you're being sincere:
"But there's nothing that can be done" is the basic thought of most people, so they just prefer to accept it and don't give an actual fuck about it. Let's be honest, it's very complicated if there's no agenda at all, imagine if there's an agenda.... (comtemplating both scenarios). Morals very rarely escape economic laws, economic laws are in a way guided by ecology, and ecology says: let's not waste resources/energy if it's not needed (for my survival).
1. If you haven't directly encountered these books with your kids, at what scale do you assume this is happening?
2. Who are "they"? And why do they want to influence children sexually?
Using your own vocabulary: yep, it's the boogeyman so if there's 3 books on which there's trans and one in 30 that shows something innapropiate sexually talking (for children) then surely it will appear in social media of those who feel concerned by those things...
Statistically talking there could be a reason to be concerned,
A good friend of mine, one of the people with whom I took my first mushrooms and LSD, is now a university professor of Sociology.
He considers himself a "socialist" and is quite Marxist, but in a quite critical and intelligent way, he is not some boring, woke and stupid guy, he has courage and values what is valuable in the tradition.
We often talk about social changes and he refers to his classes, he has been seeing new students for at least 5 years, actually more, as before he was as a teacher he was as a student and intern. We could say that he has not left the university for more than 10 years.
He comments that every year there are more trans or "queer" in his classes, he also comments that it seems to be a fashion and that it is hardly possible to make critical comments in class on various issues, since the students immediately get annoyed or feel offended. There is, however, always a critical core, in every class and in every course.
My point of view is that the confusion of these times is being orchestrated, before there were no books in which there were trans, and much less for children. You have to have some sensitivity and think about what is best for a child. Ironically, pounding a child with what is good or bad or putting things in the soup is not teaching a child.
My mother is a children's book writer, or at least she was for several years, even winning a couple of national awards.
Sometimes she talks to current mothers who like her book and those friends tell her that current children's books are BORING FUCKING BULLSHIT in which all the time they try to indoctrinate the child in something, there are no quality stories, there are no quality characters, there is no real literature, it's all an unbearable bore in which they try to "teach" the child to accept something, to be this or that way, to eat this or that, to share, to take care of nature. ... everything seems to be written by Victorian moralists but in a woke style, everything seems to be written by new age self-help writers, without any imagination whatsoever. Morals without stories, unfunny characters, self-help for toddlers. This is not what kids want. It's not what kids need.
Responding to who "They" are.
They are a group of people with extremely high purchasing power, who, bored with their money, intend to receive mental orgasms often, like you when you play Sim City.
They receive those orgasms through Control and Power. It is to be understood that they think they do "good" so they call themselves "philanthropists".
Well, these "philanthropists" have come to the conclusion that there are too many of us on this planet, at least the westerners, since we "consume" many resources and we have a lifestyle that is very expensive to their interests, besides we give too much importance to our rights and to have a dignified life with few sessions of labor slavery.
With the advent of AI and robots, the number of unemployed people with the desire to eat and too much free time would be too high, so "they" are trying to solve this problem in various ways.
One of those ways is to dismantle the core of society: the traditional family. They don't really have too much against "family" or "tradition" as a concept (unless you think all "they" are hardcore satanists). They just think it's the condition of possibility for the existence of more slaves, a means to reproduce more slaves. The problem is that now they are not as necessary as before and social atomization is also very convenient because the greater the atomization, the greater the "ghettoization" and the greater the individualism, the less possibility of social revolts.
That is why the explosion of "types of families", "genders", "queers", "drags", "subcultures", tribes and so on is highly beneficial for their long term plans: to keep the cake for themselves.