• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

Gun Pulled & Man Maced As Neo-Nazi Protestors Surround Family Drag Storytime Event

Look I got my fake ID at like 15 and by the time I was legally allowed to go to the strip clubs n drink I was over it.. I’m talking about young children, like 4 6 8ect.
 
You can’t compare sexualizing kids with sugar

sure you can. i just did it :)

i know i'm being flippant but there is a parallel. as i asked, where does your belief in what's 'right' for somebody else's kids begin and end?

most normal human beings

any true scotsman.

i've never actually asked but how many kids do you have and how old are they?

this is not directed at you, lvg, but it's not a little ironic and amusing to me to see a bunch of keep-government-out-of-my-business! right-leaners basically turn into a bunch of pearl-clutching, nanny-state liberals :)

thanks for your response. i do appreciate them.

alasdair
 
It just seems like sexualizing children is the wrong hill for liberals to die on. So many more serious issues in the country.

I wouldn't say it's liberals. I would say it's radical leftists.

I'm a left-leaning moderate/centrists and the TRAs have completely alienated me to the point that I find myself agreeing with right wingers. I am so turned off and don't want to support them anymore.

I agree with somebody else in this thread who said these first world social media virtue signalers are bored and creating drama over nothing. Problem is, they're destroying decades of real civil rights activism in the process.
 
I wouldn't say it's liberals. I would say it's radical leftists.

I'm a left-leaning moderate/centrists and the TRAs have completely alienated me to the point that I find myself agreeing with right wingers. I am so turned off and don't want to support them anymore.

I agree with somebody else in this thread who said these first world social media virtue signalers are bored and creating drama over nothing. Problem is, they're destroying decades of real civil rights activism in the process.
Classic liberals are completely different from the modern liberal. I consider myself to be one along with Glenn greenwald, Brett wienstien, etc. Not sure what the pc term for the indoctrinated liberal is tbh
 
Anything sexual in nature….not necessary or acceptable

since we're discussing definitions, would you describe this as sexual in nature:

1200px-Galleria_dell%27Accademia_Michelangelo%E2%80%99s_David%2C_Florence_2019_-_48170176431.jpg


alasdair
 
^ you think i think that's ok, krink? well, i don't. sorry to disappoint you.

but that's not my kid and i have no idea why the parents of a kid that young would allow her to participate in that. but their kid. not my kid.

when you have to sarcastically exaggerate or try to manufacture some kind of mic-drop moment based on an assumption that is wrong, what are you really arguing for?

alasdair
 
since we're discussing definitions, would you describe this as sexual in nature:

1200px-Galleria_dell%27Accademia_Michelangelo%E2%80%99s_David%2C_Florence_2019_-_48170176431.jpg


alasdair

Nudity is not innately sexual. Going to a nude beach will teach anybody that.

Sexualized performances are sexual.

So is exposing children to the genitalia of in-person performers.

So is doing performances that are traditionally meant for adults only, even if they are so-called "modified".

I think the left focusing so much on getting access to children is really bad optics. Even if the intentions are benign, it signals suspicion.
 
Nudity is not innately sexual.

right. i totally agree with you.

unfortunately, in the taliban state of florida, a school principle was just forced to resign for showing a classroom of kids that picture of a sculpture by michelangelo.


I think the left focusing so much on getting access to children is really bad optics.

i don't think "the left" is doing anything. i do think that, as i said earlier, a large harmless majority are maybe being tarred with the same brush as a small, loud, troubling minority.

alasdair
 
i don't think "the left" is doing anything. i do think that, as i said earlier, a large harmless majority are maybe being tarred with the same brush as a small, loud, troubling minority.

alasdair

I think it's a bigger deal than that. Calgary just banned protesting within a certain distance of facilities specifically because people were protestor drag story hour at the library.

It's getting crazy. People are upset that their children are being exposed to this. It doesn't even matter if the story hour is tame because that same drag queen will do adult night club performances. They are a role model for children who have easy access to the internet.

Drag queens are not role models. They're adult entertainers. They're not suitable mentors for children.
 
Nudity is not innately sexual. Going to a nude beach will teach anybody that.

Sexualized performances are sexual.

So is exposing children to the genitalia of in-person performers.

So is doing performances that are traditionally meant for adults only, even if they are so-called "modified".

I think the left focusing so much on getting access to children is really bad optics. Even if the intentions are benign, it signals suspicion.
I don't think anyone here is suggesting that children should be exposed to anyone's parts. That's a total exaggeration by a lot of you and you guys are conflating two separate concepts.

Story time =/= nudity or sex
 
Calgary just banned protesting within a certain distance of facilities specifically because people were protestor drag story hour at the library.

i agree that's not good.

People are upset that their children are being exposed to this.

then why on earth are they taking their kids to drag shows?

alasdair
 
Top