Increasingly close to getting in street brawls - I'm worried about my future

[deficiT]

The comments were also off topic too so please try to stay on topic.

 

[JohnBoy2000]

Your views on love and sex are very concerning to me.
Please correct me if I'm interpreting this wrong, but "jealous love" is a precursor to domestic abuse, and "union force" sounds a lot like rape.
Also your comments about violence in sex also sound a lot like rape.
Violence has absolutely NO place in love, and jealousy is borne from insecurity and lack of trust.
Please feel free to explain your ideas in a different way to help us understand.

The last comment from @tubgirl.jpg questions theses things also.

I intend to reply to that but it's a reply that must be precise so I need a few minutes of free time to myself to do so (i.e. why I haven't replied to it yet).

That reply should clear things up, but it'll probably be later today or tomorrow before I get around to it.

And just for completeness, current pairings are:

- "Union Love", and

- "Jealous force".

I don't know how you interpret them?

I'm trying to find the correct setup of the four cues, "jealous/love/force/union".

So "force union" was made in error.
As was "jealous love".
It's just cycling through the permutations until I find that which is functional.

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

The last comment from @tubgirl.jpg questions theses things also.

I intend to reply to that but it's a reply that must be precise so I need a few minutes of free time to myself to do so (i.e. why I haven't replied to it yet).

That reply should clear things up, but it'll probably be later today or tomorrow before I get around to it.

And just for completeness, current pairings are:

- "Union Love", and

- "Jealous force".

I don't know how you interpret them?

I'm trying to find the correct setup of the four cues, "jealous/love/force/union".

So "force union" was made in error.
As was "jealous love".
It's just cycling through the permutations until I find that which is functional.

Cool man, I appreciate you having patience with me. "Harnessed emotional explosion" - does that mean that these strong emotions, such as love/jealousy et cetera, should somehow be internalized, and by fucking, you get an explosive outlet..?

Because "emotional explosion" sounds like when you've been pushing down rage until it boils over, for example?
But maybe I misinterpret?

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

The thing is, you're using a language that I find hard to completely comprehend. Not because it's badly written, but because it contains terminology I'm unsure of as English is not my native tongue. Like I get the words, but in the context I can't make sense of it.

 

[n3ophy7e]

Did you make this slide, or is it from some kind of formal lecture?

 

[n3ophy7e]

The thing is, you're using a language that I find hard to completely comprehend. Not because it's badly written, but because it contains terminology I'm unsure of as English is not my native tongue. Like I get the words, but in the context I can't make sense of it.

If it's any consolation, English IS my native language and I still don't understand the terms in this context.

 

[JohnBoy2000]

Did you make this slide, or is it from some kind of formal lecture?

I made it, of course.

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

If it's any consolation, English IS my native language and I still don't understand the terms in this context.

My ego and I thank you wholeheartedly for helping us save face n3o

 

[negrogesic]

Did you make this slide, or is it from some kind of formal lecture?

He has all sorts of seemingly inane diagrams like that, all though they sort of logically make sense, sort of

 

[n3ophy7e]

I made it, of course.

Mate to be honest, that is even more concerning, that you are preoccupied with this concept enough to make a diagram....

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

I'd like to think I just misunderstood - like, maybe it wasn't meant as violence being exercised, but rather that if you could simulate the nerve endings with the same electrical sensations as strong emotions such as violence (not pain but the adrenaline aspect), love, jealousy produces, it would result in pleasure..?

 

[JohnBoy2000]

I'd like to think I just misunderstood - like, maybe it wasn't meant as violence being exercised, but rather that if you could simulate the nerve endings with the same electrical sensations as strong emotions such as violence (not pain but the adrenaline aspect), love, jealousy produces, it would result in pleasure..?

Saves me having to type out a response.

Exactly.

The "strong emotions" in this case are the combination of "love" being mixed with "jealous" (not violence - but nerve stimulation in this case = the violence) = makes them crazy = powerful nerve sensitization

=

So yeah, nailed it.

Only to make the emotions applicable they must be correctly combined with emotionally relevant physical states, "union/force".

It's understanding how and in what order to correctly combine these four states, "jealous/love/union/force" - that's what I've been struggling with and doing so incorrectly, causes pretty dramatic upset to both myself and others;

Reason being when you apply emotions that powerful with that potential for nerve sensitization/stimulation = it's like nuclear power.

It can be a wonderful source of heat and comfort when harnessed correctly, but one error, mistake, flaw and it blows up in your face??

.....

Thus my concern with eliciting responses leading to street brawls etc.

 

[JohnBoy2000]

So the latest permutation = "union love, jealous force" as per the diagram.

Idea being now, starting with the most civilized, "union", encouraging a mutual coming together if they so desire.

Not expressing "love" explicitly or "force" right in their face or "jealous" when someone may not necessary want to feel or experience that.

It's my first attempt placing "union" in the opening position (first impression), so we'll see what happens....

They wish to enter through "union", they can at their own discretion to experience the subsequent pleasure - but in giving that explicit choice, hopefully it will preclude undesired responses.

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

Saves me having to type out a response.

Exactly.

The "strong emotions" in this case are the combination of "love" being mixed with "jealous" (not violence - but nerve stimulation in this case = the violence) = makes them crazy = powerful nerve sensitization

=

So yeah, nailed it.

Only to make the emotions applicable they must be correctly combined with emotionally relevant physical states, "union/force".

It's understanding how and in what order to correctly combine these four states, "jealous/love/union/force" - that's what I've been struggling with and doing so incorrectly, causes pretty dramatic upset to both myself and others;

Reason being when you apply emotions that powerful with that potential for nerve sensitization/stimulation = it's like nuclear power.

It can be a wonderful source of heat and comfort when harnessed correctly, but one error, mistake, flaw and it blows up in your face??

.....

Thus my concern with eliciting responses leading to street brawls etc.

Puh - glad you're not a Bundy, dude. That's a really interesting idea. Don't you think the same could be applied to men, hypothetically?
And yes - I can imagine feeling those emotion at full power is akin to emotional nuclear power. How'd you come up with it?

If these currents could be simulated safely, I'd sign up. Very novel idea. Cudos.

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

So the latest permutation = "union love, jealous force" as per the diagram.

Idea being now, starting with the most civilized, "union", encouraging a mutual coming together if they so desire.

Not expressing "love" explicitly or "force" right in their face or "jealous" when someone may not necessary want to feel or experience that.

It's my first attempt placing "union" in the opening position (first impression), so we'll see what happens....

They wish to enter through "union", they can at their own discretion to experience the subsequent pleasure - but in giving that explicit choice, hopefully it will preclude undesired responses.

It's intriguing. I don't think I've heard anything resembling this, and it's got some work left to do, I guess?
The concept is cool. Nice work man.

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

Thus my concern with eliciting responses leading to street brawls etc.

Aha, now I got it. Right. Yeah, that's no good. There's gotta be a way without risking actual violence, but with such strong emotions, it's a challenge for sure. Even if just hypothetical, or to make it "work" in theory.

 

[JohnBoy2000]

Puh - glad you're not a Bundy, dude. That's a really interesting idea. Don't you think the same could be applied to men, hypothetically?
And yes - I can imagine feeling those emotion at full power is akin to emotional nuclear power. How'd you come up with it?

If these currents could be simulated safely, I'd sign up. Very novel idea. Cudos.

lol, well you're the first person the board to seemingly simply grasp the concept.

And yes it doesn't discriminate according to gender.
It could in my mind absolutely be applied by women, or anyone.

And what's even more interesting is (and I comment from experience), it DIRECTLY affects physiological processes.

The application of these words in the form of cues or "self-dialogue", I call it "cognition" or our "cognitive state".

Cognition appears to very directly affect the actual state of the nervous system.

A researcher from MIT called "Lisa Feldman Barrett" explores this as the basis of her career research, the effect of cognitive emotional state on the nervous system and other subsequent "downstream" physiological processes.

Over the course of deriving this setup, my body has morphed over and over again.
Putting on weight so easily and difficult to lose it, losing weight so easily and difficult to gain it, being an adonis, being a stick figure etc.

i.e. metabolic process seems to strongly correlate with the nature of nerve activity (which our "cognitive" states seems to so powerfully affect).

 

[tubgirl.jpg]

lol, well you're the first person the board to seemingly simply grasp the concept.

And yes it doesn't discriminate according to gender.
It could in my mind absolutely be applied by women, or anyone.

And what's even more interesting is (and I comment from experience), it DIRECTLY affects physiological processes.

The application of these words in the form of cues or "self-dialogue", I call it "cognition" or our "cognitive state".

Cognition appears to very directly affect the actual state of the nervous system.

A researcher from MIT called "Lisa Feldman Barrett" explores this as the basis of her career research, the effect of cognitive emotional state on the nervous system and other subsequent "downstream" physiological processes.

Over the course of deriving this setup, my body has morphed over and over again.
Putting on weight so easily and difficult to lose it, losing weight so easily and difficult to gain it, being an adonis, being a stick figure etc.

i.e. metabolic process seems to strongly correlate with the nature of nerve activity (which our "cognitive" states seems to so powerfully affect).

Haha, nice. I just had to make sure that I understood it, and that you didn't want to beat down ladies

Well, you've just blown my mind. I gotta make some coffee and think about this. I'll get back to it and look.
Is this the same that was in Best of Bluelight btw?

 

[JohnBoy2000]

How'd you come up with it?

If these currents could be simulated safely, I'd sign up. Very novel idea. Cudos.

Actually it was quite simply a means to try and improve cognitive function and performance.

Hope I don't sound like a dick here but my initial endeavour was to become a pro athlete, and I was doing quite well but I realized technical development (intellectual understanding) and athletic development (being a meathead) are almost contradictory concepts - and you need both together to function optimally.

Trying to embody both of these led me down some pretty crazy a-typical paths, and to ultimately be able to live a lifestyle which would allow optimal development in both areas, I would have to completely redefine the nature of relationships I had with people, and most specific and importantly romantic relationships with girls/women.

And what I realized is the historical societal setup of
- a woman meets a mans needs sexually, orgasms
- a man meets a womans needs of support, security, stability, status etc.

That was fucked.

What I needed to do was learn how to be able to pleasure a woman in bed as they can pleasure us, i.e. reliable induction of orgasm.
Most women can't even feel a thing through vaginal penetration exclusively.

....

And then one thing led to another and I realized I can actually take control of this process, affect the way other people respond to me, by self talk.
Implementing self dialogue.

i.e. self instruction, seems to very directly affect the responses of others to me, including their sexual responses.

And then an extremely lengthy and meticulous deductive process later - come to realize for true AFFECT (to affect profoundly their nerve stimulus response), the cues/words must be EMOTIONAL, i.e. actually have emotional relevance when spoken, in terms of how they resonate.

So I revise the entire English dictionary for such words, and exactly 4 reveal themselves.

......

And then I start looking into mathematical paradigms and certain concepts in physics and come to learn these type of "patterns" are considered a part of nature that as humans, we discover.

Anyways point being self dialogue = affects response of others to us.

And it was a process of determining the OPTIMAL self dialogue (emotion based), and implementing it in the correct order.

......

Hopefully not too hard to follow.

 

[JohnBoy2000]

Aha, now I got it. Right. Yeah, that's no good. There's gotta be a way without risking actual violence, but with such strong emotions, it's a challenge for sure. Even if just hypothetical, or to make it "work" in theory.

Yes same one, but this is the updated version basically.

It's evolution.

And BTW when I get to explaining things, I can go off on a serious bender (I love exploring this concept), so don't feel overwhelmed.

In fact don't even feel in any way obliged to respond even though I'm quoting your posts.

It's always good for me to re-clarify this process in my own mind (cause as you can tell, it can get pretty crazy - just good to remind my self its underwritten by well consolidated logic).

Your simple post has demonstrated an understanding of what I'm attempting to do and I'm satisfied with that.