• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!

Research Regarding Redosing and “3 Month Rule”

G_Chem

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Apr 17, 2015
Messages
7,883
This was originally written for another forum so keep that in mind while reading..


So I’ve noticed this asked around here a bit so figured I’d go dive back into some research articles to prove this point..

In this post I’m going to show how Repeated dosing in one session is bad for your health and why you should stick to (at most) one booster dose not long after your initial dose. I’m also going to go against the time honored “3 month rule” and show evidence that b2b rolling isn’t so bad as long dosages are kept small and you keep on average to 4-6 times a year.

Let’s start with this article..


Effect of ambient temperature and a prior neurotoxic dose of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on the hyperthermic response of rats to a single or repeated (‘binge …

A Richard Green, Veronica Sanchez, Esther O’Shea, Kathryn S Saadat, J Martin Elliott, M Isabel Colado
Psychopharmacology 173 (3-4), 264-269, 2004


In this article they gave MDMA at a variety of doses and dosing regimens, while simultaneously checking for hyperthermia. It should be noted hyperthermia (increased body temperature, fever) goes hand in hand with MDMA neurotoxicity.

They found 5mg/kg IP had no hyperthermic reaction in a environment of 19C. But did find dose dependent hyperthermic responses when 2mg/kg, 4mg/kg and 6mg/kg were dosed in three separate doses.

As the authors say,..

“Binge dosing produces a higher final peak response than a similar non-divided dose. This effect is more marked in animals housed at high room temperature.”

Next article will show that indeed you want to dose as soon as possible if you do want to redose.


Human pharmacology of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) after repeated doses taken 2 h apart

AM Peiró, M Farré, PN Roset, M Carbó, M Pujadas, M Torrens, J Camí, R De la Torre
Psychopharmacology 225 (4), 883-893, 2013

In this article subjects were given 100mg or 50mg plus 100mg 2 hours later. It was found that,

“After the second dose, physiological effects, psychomotor performance, and subjective effects were lower than expected especially for euphoria and stimulation.”

So it seems the anecdotal info is correct, unless you want to waste your MDMA while simultaneously getting increased neurotoxicity, don’t redose to long past 60-90min post initial dose.

Also this shows that the old “work up to a proper dose” isn’t smart with MDMA.

Edit- More to be found on redosing.. Ran out of time.

——————————————————————

Now let’s get into b2b dosing, or dosing before the 3 month rule. This rule came about from people like myself honestly, I’ve been spouting harm reduction for many years and 3months was what a few of us seemed to arrive at. It’s amazing to see that people listened, unfortunately it’s gone a little far these days.

By far I mean people unnecessarily worrying and somewhat removing the fun from the drug. In the end sometimes things come up where you want to roll sooner than 3months, or like my case you have a festival or two you’d like to roll b2b. Well it ain’t as bad as you may think, and if anything may actually be SAFER! (Lol I know I’ll get downvoted before people even finish reading this now.)

Let’s start with this one here..


The relationship between the degree of neurodegeneration of rat brain 5-HT nerve terminals and the dose and frequency of administration of MDMA (`ecstasy')

A quote from the article..

“A single injection (4–15 mg/kg i.p.) of MDMA produced immediate dose-related hyperthermia and a dose-related decrease in 5-HT, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and [3H]paroxetine binding in regions of the brain 7 days later, with a dose of 4 mg/kg having no degenerative effect. This dose was also without effect when given once daily for 4 days, but produced a marked loss of [3H]paroxetine binding and indole concentration (≈55%) when given twice daily for 4 days. When a dose of 4 mg/kg was given twice weekly for 8 weeks it had no effect on these serotoninergic markers, despite a clear anorectic effect of the drug being seen.”

This shows that at 4mg/kg taken once a day there is no toxicity seem even after 4 days. They also do twice weekly for 8 weeks with no effect of serotonin markers!! By contrast redosing that 4mg/kg twice a day for four days had a marked decrease in serotonin markers..

This article not only shows that low doses taken once a day won’t cause problems, but also seems to bolster the argument that redosing is bad for you.

They finish the article with a idea that I full heartedly believe through my own personal use as well as my research.

“We suggest that damage occurs when endogenous free radical scavenging mechanisms become overwhelmed or exhausted.”

I’ll show by the end why this is true and why b2b dosing can be done safely so long as your good about your antioxidant rich supplements.

Here’s our next article..


Repeated exposure to MDMA provides neuroprotection against subsequent MDMA-induced serotonin depletion in brain.
Bhide NS, et al. Brain Res. 2009.

In this article they talk about something called “preconditioning” which I’ve also spoken about in this sub. It is the idea that by giving non-serotonin depleting doses once a day for a number of days, they could then give a neurotoxic dose/regimen and be afforded protection.

In this study 10mg/kg once a day was considered non-depleting, this was done for four days. On the fifth day a neurotoxic dosage was given, (10mg/kg every 2 hours, 4 injections total) and we’re afforded neuroprotection.

What does this mean? Well again it seems single doses of MDMA are not all that toxic even as much as 10mg/kg for mice. But what’s even more interesting is that this “preconditioning” protects the brain from a high known toxic dosage.

This is why I argue b2b could be safer than every 3 months since this “preconditioning” mechanism, whatever it may be, is in place from the first dose affording the user more protection on the second dose.

Even if it doesn’t, it is very apparent once a day dosing at reasonable dosages isn’t too bad compared to redosing in a night.

I’ll finish with my own personal data. I’ve been rolling for 15yrs, and have found that there doesn’t seem to be any downsides to rolling b2b SO LONG AS I TAKE THE PROPER ANTIOXIDANTS!!! (I’ve experienced zero tolerance build, which likely indicates I’ve had little if any toxicity take place. Many research articles link toxicity and tolerance as going hand in hand.)

Did you just read that people? It goes back to what the other article said.. That neurotoxicity is directly related to our free radical scavenging/antioxidant System. Dosing MDMA ups the free radicals by 400% in our bodies so we need to compensate for that.

Back when I didn’t consume antioxidants, and didn’t eat healthy, I’d feel the days after when going b2b but these days I get a bigger afterglow from b2b rolling compared to spacing them out.

Also the roll the second night can be better so long as you were reasonable on dosage the first night, as the enzymes are still saturated from the night before.

With all this said, YOU MUST keep the first night dosage reasonable.. Research shows that if the first night dosage was too high your in greater danger the second night. What is exactly “too high”? That we don’t really know yet, but based on anecdotal data keeping under 175-200mg seems safe.

Which brings me around to the reason the 3 month rule got started and why most of you should still follow it.. Most can’t follow all the rules required to safely roll b2b.. Most can’t keep it to one reasonable dose the first night. Eating healthy the days before and after. Taking antioxidant supplements. Making sure your yearly average stays at or below 6... (This last one being the most important.)

It’s these reasons why I’m hesitant to even mention this shit. Because I know someone will use it to help justify their abuse. I’m sorry to that person but I also feel the truth is more important.

In the end total yearly average is more important but for many newer users they don’t truly know if they can handle sticking to that yet. I’d say, don’t start fucking with “breaking the 3month rule” until you’ve been rolling for a few years and can trust yourself to not start rolling every week.

Gotta go for now, ask any questions and I’ll respond when I can.. Will add more when I can.

-GC
 
Holy crap that was long. Can you TL : DR summarize this? Great post, i have some first hand experience that may support this as well.
 
Lol ya I tend to write novels...

In summary it’s not wise to redose more than once in a single night with MDMA (beyond a small booster not long after the first) both in terms of neurotoxicity and overall pleasurable effects.

Which is something people already know..

But then I also deconstruct the whole “3 month rule” and show why it’s more of rule based around averages per year. And in fact it may even be safer to consume closer together so long as you keep your antioxidant system “topped off.”

Based on research along with my own use.. If your use is kept to 4-8 times a year max, and you keep up on your antioxidants, there’s no worries.

-GC
 
This is very interesting... partly because someone could posit an argument against this with studies as well, but it won't be me. I do look at it somewhat skeptically, as many forum users could be biased towards your theory for security in their own safety/sanity as MDMA users also. Obviously the studies are the studies, but results from many don't necessarily come to this conclusion. It seems results may vary...?

I find that with MDMA usage over time, and a resulting depression, can end up in a chicken or the egg situation. Was the individual depressed before the usage of the drugs? Or, did the usage of the drugs cause depression? It's a question that sometimes cannot be answered..
 
What kind of antioxidants are you taking and how much?

I always thought the effectiveness of antioxidants are still up the air
 
This is very interesting... partly because someone could posit an argument against this with studies as well, but it won't be me. I do look at it somewhat skeptically, as many forum users could be biased towards your theory for security in their own safety/sanity as MDMA users also. Obviously the studies are the studies, but results from many don't necessarily come to this conclusion. It seems results may vary...?

I find that with MDMA usage over time, and a resulting depression, can end up in a chicken or the egg situation. Was the individual depressed before the usage of the drugs? Or, did the usage of the drugs cause depression? It's a question that sometimes cannot be answered..

I’m very open to any additional studies people want to provide. I’ve been sifting through MDMA neurotoxicity research for many years and have seen much of it but there’s so much it’s possible to miss things. To be honest I can’t think of too many studies that really dove into the frequency issue.

All research I’ve seen shows that if kept at a reasonable single dosage per day there is no serotonin toxicity.. Does that mean we should eat MDMA every day and be ok? No.. But it does imply that taking it two days in a row is probably not the death sentence others would make you believe..

I’m also open to the idea other internal systems are being messed with when used in this way.. But again I feel I’d see problems in myself and others close to me.

I’ll admit though, as I said, this could be justification for some to use too often.. Anecdotal experience shows this doesn’t end well. The few times I’ve taken a bit more than I expected that year (like 8 times..) I did notice increased depression. I think this was just a case of “empty pipes” and not damaged ones, since my tolerance never rose and the symptoms vanished after a month or two.

Just make sure to consume antioxidants!

What kind of antioxidants are you taking and how much?

I always thought the effectiveness of antioxidants are still up the air

There’s tons of research to show the toxicity of MDMA is related to our own antioxidant system becoming overwhelmed with free radicals and how antioxidants can negate the toxicity.

I personally go at it like this... I eat antioxidant rich foods on the few days before, during, and few days after. (This is most important, supplements are exactly as their name implies..). Fruit/berries, turmeric, greens/vegetables, etc.. And because I find supplements can sometimes negate the effects of MDMA, I wait until I’m coming down to take the supplements.

Not only do I do this because I’m worried about fucking up my roll, but because the toxicity comes from the metabolites not the MDMA itself. It takes awhile for these metabolites to appear in our bodies and if you eat the supplements when coming down it seems to do the job.

To give perspective, soon as I started supplements my comedowns went to afterglows. I used to sometimes get headaches the day after, not anymore.. I remember one time a headache started coming on and then I ate some Vit C gummies and it disappeared. I’ve noticed similar results in my friends. I have had zero thought or need to use 5-htp these days.

I personally eat 1-2 Airborne Chewable Tablets which has a fairly heavy dose of a Vit C along with other random antioxidants and small amounts of herbs to strengthen immunity, on the comedown or right before bed.

I also carry around Vit C gummies which are usually 120% Vit C per gummy. And I’ll give out 1-2 to random people. It really doesn’t take much. Our antioxidant system is just taxed at that moment and need an extra boost.


I always like to use myself as the prime example for why this shit works.. You’d think after 15years of MDMA use, no breaks, tons of other drug use, that I’d be fried by now. I’ve kept to all the rules and still roll like I’m 15 again. I’m emotionally and cognitively proficient, physically I’m very athletic. Still waiting on all the terrors those flawed Ricaurte studies preached about..

-GC
 
120% Vit C per gummy
Woah I need to try them sometime. Even my pure vitamin C powder, which is an indispensible supplement for me, is only 100% Vitamin C, maybe just under by % fractions.

I bet your 120's are sick bro! ?

Hehe, on a serious note, another super powerful antioxidant which I take daily for essential respiratory support is Oil of Oregano.

It is a legendary one of the most concentrated sources of antioxidants on earth along with cinnamon. I swear also that it is a potentiators of substances I take it every single day at routine times usually so I'm sure I'm just very used to this aspect but I swear that when I have vaporized cannabis and I'm high as soon as I take the oregano oil my high is increased particularly visually and colour-wise.

Also I'm sure I've mentioned this in another thread which you must have seen but raw garlic definitely potentiates psychoactive substances. And again it's one of the best sources of antioxidants.

Turmeric too, and is really a great one to take every single day as a general regiment and preventative I know that turmeric apparently does a great lot to prevent the Gene mutation which leads to cancer and significantly reduces ones risks by consuming daily.

Also great for preventing dementia apparently, with the very low incidence in India correlated with daily curry powder and turneric consumption.

So there are a lots of sources of potent antioxidants very accessible and not even something that we have to go out of our way to incorporate into our lifestyles or even a regard as a supplement.

Very interesting @G_Chem is everything you share with us mate, really appreciate your sincere effort to help others here. Hope you are having an exciting or peaceful weekend. We have been harvesting some superb Autoflowers here my mum and I.

Speaking of which if you fancy taking a look at some of our little endeavours I have put some nice little home living shops up on Instagram:
 
Last edited:
Im going to go a step further here and recommend vitamin c that actually works. Ascorbic acid is the cheapest most widely available form of vitamin C out there, yet it doesnt absorb for shit and its highly acidic.

This is a special form of vitamin-c thats WAY MORE bioavailble to your body and isnt acidic. I take 1000mg before going out to a public event space (bar, event, rave), eating at a restaurant that doesnt align with 100% with my eating habits, before a roll, before drinking, literally before anything that has the potential to get sick or lower my immune system. It works. Its high quality stuff, and they even claim 24 hour immune support.

 
To add: Around rolls i pre and post load with magnesium as well as this vitamin c. (Look for NON-OXIDE magnesium, thats the cheapest shit and doesnt absorb)
 
Im going to go a step further here and recommend vitamin c that actually works. Ascorbic acid is the cheapest most widely available form of vitamin C out there, yet it doesnt absorb for shit and its highly acidic.

This is a special form of vitamin-c thats WAY MORE bioavailble to your body and isnt acidic. I take 1000mg before going out to a public event space (bar, event, rave), eating at a restaurant that doesnt align with 100% with my eating habits, before a roll, before drinking, literally before anything that has the potential to get sick or lower my immune system. It works. Its high quality stuff, and they even claim 24 hour immune support.

Hey damn, you have just reminded me, I forgot all about what really is allegedly the absolute best and the most bioavailable form of vitamin C- Liposomal.

But it's well expensive and I never tried it partly because of that and the very high likelihood of me having an adverse reaction to it as I do with 99% plus of supplements and remedies whereas ascorbic acid I not only do not react adversely to in any way but it is incredibly useful for managing my respiratory symptoms and has always tested as being very beneficial and showing notable efficacy with Vega testing when I have been examining how various supplements are affecting my body or useful or not.

I'm not disagreeing with anything you are saying though the ascorbic acid does have its downsides most of all the acidifying nature of it if that was not the case it would be 100 times The Wonder supplement some people believe it is.

I do believe that question that it has its merits though just has to be used rightly at the right dose for the right individual, and balancing out the acidity with diet and other supplements and measures like moderate alcohol and caffeine intake etc would be vital to reducing the acidifying nature of the ascorbic acid.

The other thing and this is really quite a mad thing to think about I don't know much about this I've just skimmed on it a little but I'm sure I have got the picture right hear:

Let's say you(not "you" bro, figure of speech lol) need some serious treatment, like you are really broken and you just need to get the best thing in the world that might help you and save you and fix you up and bring you around, besides surgery.

I'm sure there are quite a few things actually which if we could afford and had access to would function like miracles, but my vote would be for IV vitamin C which I understand to be one of the most incredible healing and supportive health treatments you could possibly receive with I don't believe any Downside except prohibitive expense and limited availability.

Now is the ideal world we would all be on this stuff for free of course and everything else amazing which has been suppressed and varied and should be available to everybody who needs it in a perfect Society. I genuinely believe we could and would have this without the wicked oppressive will of the controlling tyrants on this planet whose intent is to make life as miserable and painful as possible while destroying everything which is good.


Sorry guys can't help getting sidetracked. But yeah, @epic11 I agree with you fully about ascorbic acid's poor bioavailability and MEGA high acidyfying aspect (it always boggled me how to properky use that term in all situations, like lemons, limes are acidic but very alkalising. Red wine is acidic and extremely acidifying, so many examples I forget for now)

I haven't viewed your link yet, will do now.
I wonder how much IV vitamin C therapy might assist with LTC? Honestly I would posit that it may significantly speed up recovery and improve the mindset and physiology of the patients. Just a thought anyway.


Edit- I forgot to say about Camu camu powder being a good natural source of Vitamin C. My mum takes it she really doesn't do well with ascorbic acid at all. I do much better with it myself fortunately and interestingly Vega testing has always reflected this accurately with all other supplements as well.

And I am unable to take the camu camu powder myself. I expect dried goji, acacia berries etc are also a good source.

There is also the buffered vitamin C sodium ascorbate which is simply a mixture of ascorbic acid and table salt which allegedly reduces its acidity but I can't quite get my head around this and I'll certainly do not want to put refined salt into my body if I can avoid it.


Edit 2- whoops, st 1st glance it appears the Ester C may be the sodium ascorbate, in which case sorry bro I dissed your vitamin C a bit without realising. ?
 
Last edited:
Hey damn, you have just reminded me, I forgot all about what really is allegedly the absolute best and the most bioavailable form of vitamin C- Liposomal.

But it's well expensive and I never tried it partly because of that and the very high likelihood of me having an adverse reaction to it as I do with 99% plus of supplements and remedies whereas ascorbic acid I not only do not react adversely to in any way but it is incredibly useful for managing my respiratory symptoms and has always tested as being very beneficial and showing notable efficacy with Vega testing when I have been examining how various supplements are affecting my body or useful or not.

I'm not disagreeing with anything you are saying though the ascorbic acid does have its downsides most of all the acidifying nature of it if that was not the case it would be 100 times The Wonder supplement some people believe it is.

I do believe that question that it has its merits though just has to be used rightly at the right dose for the right individual, and balancing out the acidity with diet and other supplements and measures like moderate alcohol and caffeine intake etc would be vital to reducing the acidifying nature of the ascorbic acid.

The other thing and this is really quite a mad thing to think about I don't know much about this I've just skimmed on it a little but I'm sure I have got the picture right hear:

Let's say you(not "you" bro, figure of speech lol) need some serious treatment, like you are really broken and you just need to get the best thing in the world that might help you and save you and fix you up and bring you around, besides surgery.

I'm sure there are quite a few things actually which if we could afford and had access to would function like miracles, but my vote would be for IV vitamin C which I understand to be one of the most incredible healing and supportive health treatments you could possibly receive with I don't believe any Downside except prohibitive expense and limited availability.

Now is the ideal world we would all be on this stuff for free of course and everything else amazing which has been suppressed and varied and should be available to everybody who needs it in a perfect Society. I genuinely believe we could and would have this without the wicked oppressive will of the controlling tyrants on this planet whose intent is to make life as miserable and painful as possible while destroying everything which is good.


Sorry guys can't help getting sidetracked. But yeah, @epic11 I agree with you fully about ascorbic acid's poor bioavailability and MEGA high acidyfying aspect (it always boggled me how to properky use that term in all situations, like lemons, limes are acidic but very alkalising. Red wine is acidic and extremely acidifying, so many examples I forget for now)

I haven't viewed your link yet, will do now.
I wonder how much IV vitamin C therapy might assist with LTC? Honestly I would posit that it may significantly speed up recovery and improve the mindset and physiology of the patients. Just a thought anyway.


Edit- I forgot to say about Camu camu powder being a good natural source of Vitamin C. My mum takes it she really doesn't do well with ascorbic acid at all. I do much better with it myself fortunately and interestingly Vega testing has always reflected this accurately with all other supplements as well.

And I am unable to take the camu camu powder myself. I expect dried goji, acacia berries etc are also a good source.

There is also the buffered vitamin C sodium ascorbate which is simply a mixture of ascorbic acid and table salt which allegedly reduces its acidity but I can't quite get my head around this and I'll certainly do not want to put refined salt into my body if I can avoid it.


Edit 2- whoops, st 1st glance it appears the Ester C may be the sodium ascorbate, in which case sorry bro I dissed your vitamin C a bit without realising. ?


haha. Dont worry tripper. If it went inside my body, i already read extensively about it. Even a vitamin c. :P This is a good one. :D!
 
haha. Dont worry tripper. If it went inside my body, i already read extensively about it. Even a vitamin c. :p This is a good one. :D!
Yeah I still hadn't looked at it properly when I posted, just did now. Different to the "Sodium ascorbate" I was thinking of.

Basically calcium ascorbate. And yes mate I know you are very dilligent and thorough about checking out everything you consume, I trust you have always done your homework.

I would try the Ester C except I'm almost guaranteed to be allergic to the calcium ascorbate, and definitely the bioflavonoids. Pure ascorbic acid is one of the very few supplements I can actually take without it exacerbating my respiratory symptoms.

So I believe you. But Im still a bit perplexed how it is such a radically different substance with regards to absorbability and acidifying aspects.

I'm not questioning it I just couldn't find any specific information yet on how the vitamin C is actually produced. But ot appears to be an amalgam of mostly ascorbic acid and a much smaller proportion of calcium ascorbate.

So I'm just a bit surprised that relatively small amount of calcium can go such a long way to neutralizing the acidifying nature of the ascorbic acid but the anecdotal reports from Ester c appear to be pretty convincing and legitimate.
 
Someone cross posted this to reddit and I critiqued it a bit there. I figured I might as well cross post the critique back to the original post.

So after taking a look at the scientific articles, my first thoughts: "Those papers are fantastic news for rats, they can do all the MDMA they want!" /s

Some real critiques though:
The paper you use to say rolling two days in a row is totally cool (and possibly safer than waiting for 3 months?): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2754382/

How you describe it:
In this article they talk about something called “preconditioning” which I’ve also spoken about in this sub. It is the idea that by giving non-serotonin depleting doses once a day for a number of days, they could then give a neurotoxic dose/regimen and be afforded protection.

In this study 10mg/kg once a day was considered non-depleting, this was done for four days. On the fifth day a neurotoxic dosage was given, (10mg/kg every 2 hours, 4 injections total) and we’re afforded neuroprotection.

What does this mean? Well again it seems single doses of MDMA are not all that toxic even as much as 10mg/kg for mice. But what’s even more interesting is that this “preconditioning” protects the brain from a high known toxic dosage.

This is why I argue b2b could be safer than every 3 months since this “preconditioning” mechanism, whatever it may be, is in place from the first dose affording the user more protection on the second dose.

First of all, you really buried the lead by only recommending rolling two days in a row. If I'm reading the graphs correctly to get the greatest "neuroprotection" we should all be rolling five days in a row, not two.

What about the doses involved? What is a "non-depleting" dose in human terms? Comparing rats to humans is always tricky, but luckily for us there is a whole paper about how to do it for MDMA: http://www.biblioteca.cij.gob.mx/Ar...nsulta/Drogas_de_Abuso/Articulos/38312951.pdf
However, what is most apparent is that a dose of 2 mg/kg in humans produces a peak plasma concentration that is only achieved by giving approximately 7 mg/kg to rats. Thus, a fourfold higher dose is required in rats to produce a similar peak blood plasma exposure to that seen in humans. Functional observations suggest that this is a reasonable interpretation given that a 100 mg MDMA dose (1.4 mg/kg) provokes a 0.6°C oral temperature rise in humans (Farré et al.2007) and a similar increase in rectal temperature is seen following an approximate fourfold higher dose (5 mg/kg IP) to rats (Colado et al.1995).

So to get human doses (mg/kg) we should divide the rat doses by four. A "a non-5-HT depleting dose of MDMA" in rats of 10mg/kg becomes a human dose of 2.5mg/kg. Shit, why bother to read the rest of the paper? That's way higher than the generally recommended 1.5mg/kg, the doses we've been taking all along have should have cause zero depletion of our serotonin. What about the depleting dose? "(10 mg/kg, ip every 2 hrs for 4 injections)" So 40mg/kg becomes 10mg/kg, spread out over eight hours. Did they source these rats from the UK? That's over 800mg for the average male dosed over eight hours.

That paper seems to be telling us great news though, take over 200mg a day for four days to reduce the impact of your 800mg binge. What about the other papers?


What did you get out of this one?
A quote from the article..

“A single injection (4–15 mg/kg i.p.) of MDMA produced immediate dose-related hyperthermia and a dose-related decrease in 5-HT, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and [3H]paroxetine binding in regions of the brain 7 days later, with a dose of 4 mg/kg having no degenerative effect. This dose was also without effect when given once daily for 4 days, but produced a marked loss of [3H]paroxetine binding and indole concentration (≈55%) when given twice daily for 4 days. When a dose of 4 mg/kg was given twice weekly for 8 weeks it had no effect on these serotoninergic markers, despite a clear anorectic effect of the drug being seen.”

This shows that at 4mg/kg taken once a day there is no toxicity seem even after 4 days. They also do twice weekly for 8 weeks with no effect of serotonin markers!! By contrast redosing that 4mg/kg twice a day for four days had a marked decrease in serotonin markers..

This article not only shows that low doses taken once a day won’t cause problems, but also seems to bolster the argument that redosing is bad for you.

Sounds solid. Lets take a read. (Bold is mine).
A single 15 mg/kg dose of MDMA produced a greater than 50% loss in 5-HT and 5-HIAA in the cortex, hippocampus and striatum (Fig. 2) seven days later. This loss reflected neuro-degenerative changes as was indicated by the approximately parallel loss of [3H] paroxetine binding (Fig. 2). A major neurotoxic loss was also observed after a dose of 10 mg/kg, with no significant effect after 4 mg/kg (Fig. 2)

Hold up a second. Didn't we just find out that 10mg/kg was "a non-5-HT depleting dose of MDMA" for rats? Now it's neurotoxic? This seems to strongly disagree with our other paper. Oh well, you learn something new every day. Now we have new "safe" dose, this time it's 4 mg/kg. Doing our rat to human dose calculations turns 4mg/kg into 1mg/kg. The recommended 1.5mg/kg is already lower than what most people take, I don't think anyone is going to drop it much further (1mg/kg seems like it might be very close to the threshold for most people). So handy to know but not of much use to anyone taking doses in the real world.
 
@Negi

“First of all, you really buried the lead by only recommending rolling two days in a row. If I'm reading the graphs correctly to get the greatest "neuroprotection" we should all be rolling five days in a row, not two.”

The goal of showing that study was not to prove neuroprotection so much as to show, along with the other, that neurotoxicity seems unlikely at reasonable single doses once per day.

Again I don’t claim to know the exact mechanism, but based on this and the other research article which looks at giving MDMA at adolescences rats which later provides neuroprotection, it doesn’t seem like a solid 5 days is the exact time needed. I get the impression the mechanism is linear and additive.

This would mean that while yes not much neuroprotection would be afforded compared to the 5 day regimen, I’d still wager your wrong when you assume there’s a threshold which must be passed.

The main point of it all, when looking at that as well as the other study is that back to back dosing is likely not as bad as people think.

“Hold up a second. Didn't we just find out that 10mg/kg was "a non-5-HT depleting dose of MDMA" for rats? Now it's neurotoxic? This seems to strongly disagree with our other paper. Oh well, you learn something new every day. Now we have new "safe" dose, this time it's 4 mg/kg. Doing our rat to human dose calculations turns 4mg/kg into 1mg/kg. The recommended 1.5mg/kg is already lower than what most people take, I don't think anyone is going to drop it much further (1mg/kg seems like it might be very close to the threshold for most people). So handy to know but not of much use to anyone taking doses in the real world.”

While I did miss that since I only viewed the abstract, it doesn’t really have much to do with the part of the abstract I was focusing on. SO many MDMA research studies have discrepancies between them, I’m not going to throw the baby out of the bath water here.

The point of that article was to more show that frequency once again when kept to once a day shows little signs of issues. Even so much as to do so for twice a week as well for 8 weeks..

The differences between the two could of been a number of factors.. Maybe for whatever reason the rats used in the second study you quote had a weaker antioxidant system to clear free radicals and could not handle the higher doses.


I tend to look at the information as a whole from many research article sources. While the second paper you quote does represent rather low human MDMA dosages, it is not the average when you look in whole at other articles. In fact it’s fairky low. Once again let’s not toss all the information aside, the frequency information seems to validate other articles.

I can come back soon to bring in some articles to refute that 10mg/kg single dose if you’d like..

-GC
 
Hey @G_Chem here is something of interest- magnets. And specifically magnetized water.

We have been using Magnetized water for years now- North Pole for us, Souty Pole for how are cannabis plants and boy you should see the difference that makes to any type of plant.

I was trying to dig up a link for somebody on a growing forum and I came across a new one so it was quite interesting, but it definitely appears that magnotherapy could be potentially very useful in combating and reducing the harmful effects of MDMA.


A particular quote:

"Because it potentates the body's free radical scavenger and antioxidant system, magnetotherapy is reported to be valuable in counteracting degenerative processes causing heart and circulatory disease, arthritis and auto-immune illness, as well as neuro-degenerative and allergic afflictions. Drinking magnetic water is said to impart many similar benefits."
 
Very interesting stuff! Definitely validates a lot of my own rolling practices.

I more certainly notice a less stressful come-up if i'm in a cool environment. I've always chalked that up to the air being more refreshing to breath. Now that I think about it, the times I've got those scary and intense pins and needles in my extremities from MDMA were in really warm environments. The two instances that come to mind are at gorge in WA, evening after it being over 40C in the day, was the first time I got it, and the other time was a large indoor show that had very little ventilation.

Nothing feels better than like a 20-25C summer night for rolling, warm enough to just wear a T-shirt, but not so hot that a crowd would be uncomfortable.

I'm curious where you could draw the line between toxic redosing and neuroprotective b2b rolling, like at what time elapsed from the first dose does it cross over from neurotoxic to neurprotective? Just for example, if a redose is defined as any MDMA consumption 12 hours after the initial dose, is a b2b roll then 24 hours after the initial dose? Seems like a strange continuum, since then at some point past the b2b dose you're back to neurotoxic stuff (i.e. 3 months). Just seems odd that it goes from neurotoxic (redose) -> neuroprotective (b2b) -> relatively more neurotoxic (3 months), imagine that graph...

I will say, rolling b2b nights or a day off in between probably accounts for 60% of my MDMA consumption historically, and I've never ever felt diminished effects on the second roll with the same dose, and if anything I've felt increased effects (although, this could be amplified by the generally higher dose of LSD I take the second time to account for that tolerance.) Honestly though, MDMA anecdotes from me are even more useless since I 95% of the time take it with varying doses of LSD.

@G_Chem could you recommend me a good antioxidant regimen? Would it just be like a simple pill or is better to get it through raw foods? I could slam some blueberries on a candlyflip lol
 
I also carry around Vit C gummies which are usually 120% Vit C per gummy. And I’ll give out 1-2 to random people. It really doesn’t take much. Our antioxidant system is just taxed at that moment and need an extra boost.

Aw...we both carry vitamin C gummies to parties and hand them out to those in need. Love it! One of my friends always looks at me appreciatively around dawn when I hand them out and asks, "How do you always remember this?"
 
and I've never ever felt diminished effects on the second roll with the same dose, and if anything I've felt increased effects
This fits with my experience of MDMA. Certainly possible to feel equal or many times greater effect re dosing on the second day providing not too much sleep has been had if any. Over longer binges of many days on end there would also be great variability to the effect from similar doses from night to night.
 
This fits with my experience of MDMA. Certainly possible to feel equal or many times greater effect re dosing on the second day providing not too much sleep has been had if any. Over longer binges of many days on end there would also be great variability to the effect from similar doses from night to night.

You find that sleep reduces the effectiveness of back to back rolls? Interesting if so, MDMA certainly has some deliriant-insomnia like effects (someone posted a study on here about this recently), a friend of mine only does the stuff by doing small 10-20mg bumps all night long for that effect.

I find I get the most out of drugs in general if I'm well rested and had a good balanced meal a few hours prior. I usually sleep like baby after good MDMA
 
Ok @Negi hasn’t come back to refute anything yet. I’d just like to add one more thing that only makes my argument stronger.

While yes there is rough “species to species” dosage transition charts, they are rough at best. As is the case with MDMA, where dosages actually correlate pretty well rat to human.

In this study..

Effects of Dose and Route of Administration on Pharmacokinetics of (±)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine in the Rat
Michael H. Baumann, Dorota Zolkowska, [...], and Marilyn A. Huestis

They talk about the MDMA cMax values for 2mg/kg in rats was similar to 1.5mg/kg in humans.

So with this in mind, we can now assume that many of these research studies are actually safer than you once assumed.. Wouldn’t you agree Negi?

-GC
 
Top